Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
Yes I agree with you about Trains not being as in depth about their reporting as they use to be. I've been getting Trains for the past nine years and the articles do not seem to have the detail they once had, maybe we just have to wait while the Mark(Hemphill) gets his hands wrapped around the ball(so to speak) and leds the magazine in his own direction. One issue I really liked for the detail involved was the October 1995 issue regarding UP. When I pick up the latest issue from the news stand I look to see what is coming next month and think I will have to get that issue. One issue I was disapointed with was this years January issue, the cover story turned out to be nothing more than a pictorial. I can understand that not every issue can contain stories that are highly detailed but I felt a liitle bit more on the history could have been included. On the Amtrak issue(pun unintended), it is a big issue now with a new president and Amtrak asking Congress for more money, wait a few months and it will go away(the news not Amtrak) <br />
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag