Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
Mike, I thought I answered the question quite clearly before. If the public doesn't want a nuclear power plant, they surely won't want to risk a nuclear locomotive. I finally read your posts in the 'Mallet' thread. I hope you will excuse me but you sound like you are suffering from schizophrenia. In the begining of your posts, it sounds as if you were being shown a reworked N&W locomotive and being told that it now was nuclear powered. In your later posts, you clearly state that you are the brains behind the whole operation. Some of your dates jump around too. Your pressure numbers sound a little on the high side. And I have not heard of lead and steel being alloyed for any useful purpose. I would appreciate it if you would admit that this is a fantasy of yours. If you don't, I may ask you a few questions about this engine that you may find hard to answer. I have some acquaintances who served on nuclear powered ships and another who works in the nuclear power industry. I will gladly enlist their help to demonstrate your depth of knowledge in this field. Your biggest flaw though is that anyone capable of building a nuclear locomotive wouldn't be bragging about it on Trains.com and then reduced to four-letter-words when challenged about the voracity of his claims. Best wishes for a full recovery. - Ed
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag