Trains.com

"Madcap motorists" and Grade Crossings

1521 views
7 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Calumet City, IL
  • 95 posts
"Madcap motorists" and Grade Crossings
Posted by SW 1200 on Thursday, August 28, 2008 5:30 PM

While doing research for a RR book that I am writing,

I came across this article published in an Indiana newspaper called

THE LAKE COUNTY TIMES;  It was published on September 4, 1924. 

 

OHIO MOTORISTS MUST PAY FOR DAMAGE

TO TRAINS IN GRADE CROSSING SMASH UPS

By Carl L. Turner

COLUMBUS, OHIO.  Sept 4--Motorists who have a thirst to race with death at grade crossings are up against a new problem in Ohio.  When racing with a Scioto Valley Interurban train they either win by a length or so, or they lose; place and show have been erased from the board. 

     Should the gasoline jockey arrive at the grade crossing just a few seconds ahead of the trains, he's a candidate for the morgue or the hospital.  If he attempts to cross the tape just a few seconds after the car takes the heat, his mail very shortly is certain to contain a bill from the interurban company for damages if he scars one their [railroad] cars. 

     Speeders who disfigure the interurban cars before the inception of the pay-for-what-you-break plan thought they were lucky---many even considered themselves the winners---if they came through without personal injuries.  Now, when they scan the bill for the repairs to the several ton intercity car, they have a change of heart.  For automobile repairs cost as they do, [they] can't even approximate the deflation of the full pocketbook when it comes to reconditioning electric street cars. 

     Officials of the Scioto Valley Company, becoming weary of the monotony of paying for new journal boxes, replacing steps and re-painting cars damaged by reckless drivers, hit upon the novel scheme of permitting the speed demon to share in the expense.  The time will come, according to J.O. Bradfield, claim adjuster for the Scioto Valley Company, when all railroads, steam and electric, will adopt the policy of his company in forcing foolhardy automobile drivers to pay for the damage they cause to rolling stock. 

     "It isn't so much the money we get that we care for," Bradfield explained, "but it helps to teach these madcap motorists a lesson.  The next time they approach a grade crossing they will be doubly careful, and perhaps the toll of human lives at these intersections will be reduced.  In many instances these persons pass the word along to their friends too, and their friends are more careful." 

     Since the inauguration of the plan, ten persons have paid varying amounts in to the Scioto Valley Company coffers after striking an interurban car in the front, rear or amidship, Bradfield said.  Strangely enough, none of these persons to whom bills for damage were sent offered any protest, but joined in the spirit of the movement and remitted checks, according to the claims adjuster.  The greater percentage of accidents called to the attention of the claims adjuster are the result of the automobile striking the interurban car Bradfield asserted. 

     Various civic organizations throughout the state have approved the Scioto Valley Company's plan and it had come in for commendation from certain state officials who are charged with the responsibility of reducing grade crossing accidents to a minimum in Ohio.  Conferees at the Safety First parley called by Governor Vic Donahey here recently lauded the new method of impressing upon the motor car driver the seriousness of grade crossing collisions. 

     "If they don't value their lives enough to stop, look and listen at the intersection, then we must encourage safety first through their pocketbooks".   

 

 

 

TonyM.

 

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: SW Chicago Suburbs
  • 788 posts
Posted by Mr_Ash on Thursday, August 28, 2008 5:39 PM
Thats a nifty idea! Smile [:)]
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: MP 175.1 CN Neenah Sub
  • 4,917 posts
Posted by CNW 6000 on Thursday, August 28, 2008 5:43 PM

 Mr_Ash wrote:
Thats a nifty idea! Smile [:)]

+1.  I wonder how much this would deter AGC accidents.

Dan

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Thursday, August 28, 2008 6:12 PM
 CNW 6000 wrote:

 Mr_Ash wrote:
Thats a nifty idea! Smile [:)]

+1.  I wonder how much this would deter AGC accidents.

Not one iota - The ambulance chasers and the media they feed under the table would make sure that idea never sees the light of day.

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: St. Louis, MO
  • 432 posts
Posted by Ishmael on Thursday, August 28, 2008 6:43 PM

Notice that even back in 1924, with fewer cars, we had the same problem we have today.

If any of us is still here in 2084, and railroads and automobiles are still in use, we will still have the same problems. So we might as well relax and continue discussing the problem.

Baltimore and Ohio-America's First Railroad
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Friday, August 29, 2008 5:03 PM

Great idea, still.

The Class I railroads, regionals, and commuter agencies should push hard for something like this.

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Aledo IL
  • 1,728 posts
Posted by spokyone on Saturday, August 30, 2008 12:23 PM

I have always believed that the railroad rountinely bills the motorist's insurance company for damages.

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago, Ill.
  • 2,843 posts
Posted by al-in-chgo on Tuesday, September 2, 2008 10:06 PM
 spokyone wrote:

I have always believed that the railroad rountinely bills the motorist's insurance company for damages.



I thought the same thing. Most states require motorists to carry "Personal Liability and Property Damage" and destruction of RR property would need to be paid for, just as if the driver had damaged a city light standard or a privately-owned fence (or car).

It might not be enough money, though . . . those gates aren't cheap! Does anyone know if the RR's pursue the malfeasant motorist beyond the policy limits? Try to get it out of his hide, so to speak? - a. s.

al-in-chgo

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy