Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
Dear dougal, I agree!!!! The new nose on the SD70ACe's looks worse than, well, a low GP9 nose, and a lot worse than a U25-B (whose nose nobody can rave about). As for the Evolution series, I thought those looked pretty much like DASH-9's (which look pretty good). But hey--why don't they take a lesson from the past, and make a locomotive resemble an RS-3 or something that looked really good. Of course, carbody diesels woule be hard to switch with, but those RS-3's and SD-9's look nice. Just stick a modern engine and equipment inside it, and voila!!! railfans and railroaders are happy! Dear Alaskaman: we know that railroads don't care about looks (although they used to, resulting in the Warbonnet, Daylight, Armour Yellow, and a lot of other pretty things), but if you let us railfans complain here, the railroaders don't have to hear it in person [:)]. Of course, General Electric's P42 takes the cake for aesthetically challenged (other than that, GE diesels look very nice--at least to me. Then again, I am a railfan...). Sincerely, Daniel
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag