Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Taking back the 'roads
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
Anything but shortsighted. Your succinct picture of robotized regression says volumes. <br /> In order (more or less): <br />1. There still is some track where I want to go. <br />2. The right of ways are ours by citizenship, but rather than make an issue of it, I end-run the thing with ridership. How do think the flat-earth railrippers got their way? Or, on a more positive note, certain cyclists in California? <br />3. Who is served? As in the above. Any group of youse who want to go someplace together and agree on how much of it you can stand. <br />4.Washington has made "subsidy" into a truly ugly word. Can we skip it? Think user fee. <br />5. Personally, the routes I'm looking at don't head for the big cities. <br />6. Who says I'm "hopping" on anything? <br />7. I admire the elan of a wind-inspired concept that could help wrongfoot OPEC, but it's a bit beyond my grasp. Standard powerplants, many sizes, fueled with a variety of compressed surplus gases are more in my scope. <br /> John Bradley
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy