Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
jointed rail vs CWR
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote user="mudchicken"]<p>Perception vs. Reality</p><p>Methinks you exagerate more than just a tad. Rail detectors, geometry cars, liteslice, random freight car impact detectors and corrugation analyzers would have umasked something that bad long ago. Uncle Pete woulda put some secondhand CWR out there long ago or dropped the track to Class 1 (10 MPH) if the conditions you described were out there on consecutive runs (no matter what local supervision said - <strong>Big Yellow is zero tolerance obsessive like that, </strong>and they have resource$ that CNW would never have had). The FRA guys woulda caught it too , independent of UP. (and you don't leave paint and other markings out there to make it easier for FRA to find unless you have addressed the situation)....</p><p>[/quote]</p><p> </p><p>I beg to differ. As an engineer for CP I run over the UP Milwaukee Sub between Shermer and Bryn Mawr quite often. We all comment on how bad the track is through there and it's been that way since I started running over it in 2001. Bad spots stay bad for a very long time, often without a slow order giving pretty wild rides at times. </p><p> </p><p>Terrible track compared to CP's. </p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy