Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
OT: I-35W bridge collapse in Minneapolis
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote user="Convicted One"][quote user="Bucyrus"]. But as a taxpayer, it would be nice to know the workings of MNDOT's so-called technical score that justified their awarding the contract to the contractor that bid $57 million higher than the next highest bidder. <p>[/quote]</p><p> </p><p>I share COMPLETELY your sentiment there. So the following should not be taken as an argument against your position, just stating facts.</p><p>At one time I was heavily involved in contract work with the General Services Administration. Where EVERYTHING is supposed to be bid competitively. Anyone who is qualified to bid the various projects (supposedly) being welcome to do so. Often the contracting officers know before the original solicitation for offers is even made public, exactly who it is they intend to have do the work. The bidding process is (often) a mere formality to maintain a charade of protecting the public interest.</p><p>In such instances there are unlimited opportunities to make the prefered contractor somehow appear to be 'uniquely qualified' in order to steer the work towrds the intended awardee'. </p><p>It feels great when you know you are the contractor that they prefer to use anyway, and EXTREMELY frustrating in the instances where you figure out that they have a prefered source OTHER than you. Making you feel like you are beating your head against a wall even writing the bid.</p><p>Sometimes the rationale in determining a 'prefered' awardee is semi legitimate, maybe a contractor has an extensive track record of completeing the type project at hand in an expedient and trouble free (to the contracting officer/government) manner.</p><p>And sometimes the motives are LESS than honorable. Hard telling which is which in the example at hand.</p><p>Funny that the government does not feel the need to be more forthright in explaning the conditions you mention. Usually when the government is at a loss for words, that runs up a red flag, fwiw</p><p>[/quote]</p><p>That sure sounds like what this I35W bid looks like. There was a little hubub in the news right as the story revealed that the highest bidder won, but it quickly faded. I can understand the state not stepping forth to expose the process behind the technical scoring. It was challenged by the other two bidders, but apparently that has gone nowhere. They claimed that they did not know that the bridge project included public outreach. What is most disconcerting is the complete lack of curiousity on the part of the local press and TV news.</p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy