Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Road Railer-Why isn't this a slam-dunk?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote user="rrnut282"] <p>Why would a Roadrailer train need Distributed Power Units? They have ample H.P/Tonnage ratios. </p><p>[/quote]</p><p>It has nothing to do with horsepower to tonnage ratios. Rather, if one wishes for a bi-modal consist to exceed 150 units (the max allowed under FRA rules), one would need to employ a radio-controlled locomotive to be in charge of the extra units. It wouldn't be distributed power in the context of shared power, but rather it would be a second section that is physically connected to the lead consist, and the second locomotive would be radio-controlled by the lead locomotive's engineer.</p><p>The physical connection between the tail end of the lead segment and the second locomotive would have to be arranged in such a way so that there is no chance of the second locomotive pushing on the lead consist (in violation of the prohibition of using pushers on TOW's), only pulling the trailing consist. Thus, the emergence of the "cushion car".</p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy