Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Should the Government Breakup Union Pacific?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote]QUOTE: <i>Originally posted by K. P. Harrier</i> <br /><br />It seems one cannot stop and wave at a UP train anymore without fear of going to jail. It seems one cannot decal a model locomotive with UP on it without some type of royalty payment. If the government decreed a breakup of the UP into two or three roads, it seems few tears would ever be shed. <br />[/quote] <br /> <br />There is a lot of romanticizing over the fallen flags of yore,... the smaller companies had more character, so people could identify with them better, and there is the "back yard" syndrome....but honestly there isn't a single one of those older, smaller companies that wouldn't have built every single mile of profitable track in the country, if they had access to the capital to do so,...the "conglomeration" in a way is natural and to be expected, do you think it woud be much different if the name were "Rock Island" or SSW instead of UP? I doubt it, personally
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy