Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
The Fall of Luxury Trains
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote user="jeaton"]<p> so there is obviously no point for them to report financials using anything other than useful life straight line depreciation.</p><p> </p><p>[/quote]</p><p> </p><p>I'm shocked that you would say that. Given a business that has to pitch it's case for survival funding, adjusting the rate at which long term expenses are realized would certainly have an impact on the claimed cost of doing business.</p><p> </p><p>wouldn't it?</p><p> </p><p><a href="http://www.amtrak.com/pdf/fy04businessplan.pdf">Interesting things I've found</a> show that Amtrak has been very creative in using "sale /lease back" arrangements with it's rolliing stock, where the proceeds of the sale have been used to offset 'other depreciation' , while the leasing expense is written off as a current expense</p><p> </p><p>I also see where they did start<a href="http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d02912r.pdf"> reporting amortization to congress differently</a> in Nov 2001 , which while not what I thought I recalled, may be the source of that foggy memory moment I had.<br /> </p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy