Trains.com Sites
Resources
Shop
E-mail Newsletters
SEARCH THIS SITE
Help
Contact Us »
|
Customer Service
Get our free e-mail newsletters
Model Railroader
(weekly)
Model Railroader VideoPlus
(weekly)
Trains
(weekly)
Classic Toy Trains
(bi-weekly)
Garden Railways
(bi-weekly)
Classic Trains
(bi-weekly)
By signing up I may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers from Trains.com. We do not sell, rent or trade our e-mail lists.
Details about our newsletters »
Read our privacy policy »
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Search Community
Searching
Please insert search terms into the box above to run a search on the community.
Users Online
There are no community members online
Thread Details
Rate This
1
Reply — 759 Views
0
Subscribers
Posted
over 20 years ago
Thread Options
Subscribe via RSS
Share this
Tag Cloud
1950s
advice
Amtrak
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe
Baltimore and Ohio
Boxcars
Bridges
Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Caboose
Canada
Canadian National Railway
Canadian Pacific Railway
cargo
Chicago
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy
Colorado and Southern
Coupler
Coupling
CSX
dcc sound
Depots
Diesel Engines
education
Emporia
fec
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Digital Photography: Relationship between pixels and 'dpi'
Digital Photography: Relationship between pixels and 'dpi'
|
Want to post a reply to this topic?
Login
or
register
for an acount to join our online community today!
Digital Photography: Relationship between pixels and 'dpi'
Posted by
bobgroh
on
Mon, Feb 2 2004 11:04 PM
Not exactly train stuff but could stand a little explanation on relationship between pixels and dpi (dots per inch). The pictures from my Olympus 1.3 Megapixel camera (hi resolution jpeg format) are 1260 x 800 pixels (or thereabouts). Or slightly bigger than my video monitor screen in what ever mode it is in. I can divide the # pixels by the screen width in inches and that should be the equivalent of 'dots per inch' if each dot is a pixel. But doesn't that make 'dpi' a function of the viewing device rather than the basic digital picture itself? I know the 'dpi' is historically related to the printing world and certainly was used in the early computer printers (i.e. the now ever so ancient '10 dpi' types) but how can I relate, for example, TRAINS request for digital pictures of at least '75 dpi' with the resolution of my (now) old Olympus? Inquiring minds want to know! Thanks.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Replies to this thread are ordered from "oldest to newest". To reverse this order, click
here
.
To learn about more about sorting options, visit our
FAQ page
.
Posted by
eastside
on
Sat, Feb 21 2004 1:40 AM
DPI really has meaning in context with printed or hardcopy output, meaning that for each horizontal or vertical inch there are that number of pixels. I don't know why TRAINS requests "75 dpi" images since one can arbitrarily change the number of pixels/inch in an image editing program.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Digital Photography: Relationship between pixels and 'dpi'