and since the bents are not built using piles (round timbers pounded into the ground), some kind of foundation is needed under each bent to secure them
Mark
With the trestle's bents not parallel with the flow of water and the tremendous power of moving water, I would be afraid that rising water and debris caught by the bents would result in in the trestle's failure.
The second bridge, a trestle, at the construction place.
More bents, and the creek have to follow. :
Wolfgang
Pueblo & Salt Lake RR
Come to us http://www.westportterminal.de my videos my blog
SPVThat color looks right on, Wolfgang. Very reminiscent of southern Utah to my eye.
Here is southeast Utah, along the San Juan River
A top part of the Goosnecks, carved by the San Juan.
And I think of CO or NM .
Testing color - or - the fight to find the "right" color
Now I'm busy with scenery. I've changed the position of the two bridges. The second bridge, a trestle is still to be built. I'm waiting for bridge ties.
Here I'm placing rocks, this area needs quite a few rocks.
Say thats nice. I downloaded ur pics to study. looks like you have about as much space as me.
very nice work.
Rory
Wolfgang,excellent bridge,and I agree 100%, Brunks book is one of the best. I've always liked his work ,but when he built "Little Colorado" in that mobile home,it blew me away. I've been looking at mobile homes ever since with an eye to removing the interior and building a layout in there. Imagine a 14x65 foot spaace or even a double wide. One could have a Fremo convention in there.
Brunks research is also very thorough, way more than the average modeler needs but nonetheless interesting to know. The bit on the different styles of stock cars for instance , and roof details of boxcars another. I guess the point of this is to show how far accuracy and detail can be taken. BILL
... thanks, Wolfgang!
Sir Madog Wolfgang,where do you get your cork sheets from? I am looking for a source other than Conrad, which is way overpriced.
Ulrich, you have an email with the address from this shop here in Iserlohn.
wedudler Glen,I keep it simple. I work everywhere with 5 mm (0.2'') cork over 9 mm ( 0.35'') plywood. In the pics you see the plywood survace from the segments. I get this cork in big sheets. But in the town I will use this cork everywhere. The track will be buried in the ground. To get this better I have an additlional sheet of 2 mm (0.08''). This way I come out just short under rail head.Prototype pictures are always good. Wolfgang
Glen,
I keep it simple. I work everywhere with 5 mm (0.2'') cork over 9 mm ( 0.35'') plywood. In the pics you see the plywood survace from the segments. I get this cork in big sheets. But in the town I will use this cork everywhere. The track will be buried in the ground. To get this better I have an additlional sheet of 2 mm (0.08''). This way I come out just short under rail head.
Prototype pictures are always good.
Wolfgang,
where do you get your cork sheets from? I am looking for a source other than Conrad, which is way overpriced.
Nice job, Wolfgang!
One of my favorite chapters in Bunk's book is the one on "little bridges." Culverts and such are too often overlooked on layouts. (Gee, how I dislike layouts where the bottom of the ties/roadbed is altitude zero.)
Harry W. Brunk’s "Up Clear Creek on the narrow gauge" is a good source of ideas and information. In part 32 describes Harry Brunk the building of his Truss Rod Bridge. This bridge will be my Silver Creek bridge.
The bridge is not yet finished. I run out of 8'' x 8'' strip wood. This is what I want for the bridge ties.
Work goes on. Here's the last segment.
Now it's time for some track. You see the cork roadbed.
ccturnouts Wolfgang,BTW.... working on your turnouts, I have a question since I have your attention. What thickness is your road bed material on the Dual Gauge main line and the thickness of the road bed material for the narrow gauge area? Got the curved dual gauge switches done and managed to get the transition from code 83 to the code 55 within the turnout. When I finish these turnouts, I'll send you some photos.... I took some time off this week and will be home tomorrow late. And I have some new turnout photos that you might be interested in seeing. Glen ThomasCream City Turnouts
BTW.... working on your turnouts, I have a question since I have your attention. What thickness is your road bed material on the Dual Gauge main line and the thickness of the road bed material for the narrow gauge area? Got the curved dual gauge switches done and managed to get the transition from code 83 to the code 55 within the turnout. When I finish these turnouts, I'll send you some photos.... I took some time off this week and will be home tomorrow late. And I have some new turnout photos that you might be interested in seeing.
Glen Thomas
Cream City Turnouts
analog kid,
that's easy, the group I belong to has decided to model this. We have a big frame, era 1930 to 1960 and DRGW, RGS, C&S in Colorado and New Mexico.
Whats up with everybody doing the Colorado narrow guage? What about EBT, or the 2 ft. guage SRRL in Maine? Personally, my fav is the WWF (Wiscasset, Waterville, and Farmington), a 2 foot guage railroad that became part of the SRRL. Even have scratchbuilt 2 8ft. workcars, with 3 33ft. flatcars waiting on parts. Got plans for a module using the cars.
Not bad for a 14 yr. old, eh?
Nice work on the stake pockets. I love the concept.
Here's my first narrow gauge car, a Micro Engineering kit with Kadee trucks. Assembling those trucks without tool is .... fun.
Model railroading is fun! It's a hobby.
I'm still waiting for couplers.
The code 55 track is on my short transition module. This module has two different profiles.
Hello together,
a few FREMO-friends, including Wolfgang, working on a standard for H0n3 in FREMO.
I have before christmas bought some turnouts of a manufacturer I will not name, terrible quality. Fortunately I am in the spring to become aware ccturnouts.
after I have build a few special turnouts for my own station , a friend and I bought there turnouts. I know Wolfgangs quality, if he builds turnouts! top class, really!
ccturnouts but must not hide!
Unfortunately, I have my selfmade turnouts already installed. but check my own homepage.
http://www.hon3fan.de/hon3fan/Bilder/Seiten/Powder_Gulsh.htm
Speaking of HOn3 I thought you might appreciate these. A few pics of a buddy's HOn3 layout:
San Dimas Southern slideshow
PM - private e-mail
wedudlerGlen, I like this idea. The narrow gauge part will be code 55. You have a PM.Wolfgang
Glen, I like this idea. The narrow gauge part will be code 55. You have a PM.
"PM"? It's probably something I have or should know, but I'm baffled.
Glen
ccturnoutsWolfgang.......... I know you enjoy building your own turnouts as much as I do, but I'd like to offer my services on your next dual gauge module, you just pay the shipping.I'll incorporate much of your techniques in them. Let me know and make the module a challenging one. I love a challenge.. Glen
Wolfgang.......... I know you enjoy building your own turnouts as much as I do, but I'd like to offer my services on your next dual gauge module, you just pay the shipping.
I'll incorporate much of your techniques in them. Let me know and make the module a challenging one. I love a challenge..
Snip: "Anyone in narrow gauge?'
Wolfgang, that's a nice plan for a module. The plan is efficient, elegant, and in character for narrow gauge especially when you provide a geographical context justifying the cramp arrangement requiring special track work.
Wolfgang:
That first module of yours looks very good. Nicely done transition track.
Your overlapping wye is a good space saving idea, very much what a narrow gauge line would do.
If I could offer one observation, don't have too much dual gauge track. If both standard and narrow gauge are going to the same places then there's no need (economically speaking) for the narrow gauge.
I was bitten by the narrow gauge bug last summer, and I'm starting my own efforts to design and (ultimately) build a Colorado Standard Gauge (i.e.3 foot gauge) railroad.
Best regards,
Mike
This is my plan for the module, made of three segments.
There're no compicated turnouts, no dual gauge turnouts with many frogs.
Perhaps I have to build another module ???
Good place to start, Wolfgang, as that's the simplest form of dual-guage turnout. Though simple, however, they aren't very interesting looking. I like the look of a turnout where the narrow gauge continues straight and the dual guage turns off toward the side of the narrow gauge (using 3 frogs) and where the dual gauge splits with the narrow gauge in one direction and the standard gauge the other direction (using 2 frogs).