Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
Jay: All the locomotives you name fall within the 20 year time-frame you mention. Rather than getting the heaviest of heavy iron think about this instead: Decide what you want your layout to represent. Unless you have the space and the large radius curves to handle such large locomotives ask yourself what what these locomotives will be moving? Freight or passengers? What sort of each? Once you decide those and related questions you can match your power to your and your line's need. A decapod (2-10-0) was mentioned. It would look great with a string of mixed freight behind it on most any medium size layout. The engine has heft but doesnt require 48" inch radius curves to look good. If you really like steam at its climax think about some of the smaller state of the art steamers. Then work up to the truly gigantic power units once you have the space and IF you still want them. I do agree with you about one thing. REAL LOCOMOTIVES have visible moving parts;) Randy
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag

Update Reply

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Model Railroader Newsletter See all

Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!