Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Prototypical Detail Standards?

411 views
1 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: Milwaukee & Toronto
  • 929 posts
Prototypical Detail Standards?
Posted by METRO on Sunday, March 18, 2007 12:42 PM

There have been some threads lately about unprototypical models and paint schemes being sold and how some are irate about such things.  Well this got me to thinking about the standards we all hold our model railroads to, and I'm wondering what everyone thinks is "close enough" for their line?

I'm currently designing and building a small side layout (Conrail in Boston in the 1990s) to work on for the next few years while I'm living in an appartment and finnishing college.  This is the closest to true prototype-modeling I've ever done so I've made a new set of standards for this new pike. For mine there are a few hard rules I follow for my rolling stock and a few things that I deliberately let slip. I reciently had a bit of a decision to make regarding motive power that made my rules very apparent. The Boston line primairly used GE locomotives in the 1990s and Atlas has a great B23-7 in Conrail's more modern Quality scheme, however, my LHS had P2K GP38-2s on sale for less than half the price of the Atlas B23-7s.  So being the frugal modeler I am (and showing my like of second-generation Geeps) I bought the P2Ks, and three freight cars for less than the price of one Atlas.

Now when I got home I learned that the prototypes for the models I bought were ex-Penn Central 81" nose GP38-2s that were retired by Conrail before 1994.  Eh, I figure I'll let it slide, I'll take some modelers license and say that Conrail didn't retire them and if anyone asks why there were Geeps doing the work usually done by Dash-7s I'll just say the GEs are in the shop.

However, there are rules I won't bend, particularly regarding the federal rules. I try to match the propper trucks for any freight car on my line to the prototype, same with ladders and brake gear. On engines, since I model Conrail, they must have the prototypical classification lights and basic detailing including signal gear, snowplows and horns as prescribed by reality. Since Amtrak also runs over my pike I try to get as close to possible (including engine and car numbers) to what was used at that time in Boston. 

So what standards do others apply to their lines, I'm curious to know?

Cheers!

~METRO 

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • 255 posts
Posted by ranchero on Sunday, March 18, 2007 1:03 PM

well they are several standard ive set and try to obey when it comes to car

correct time frame ( i.e built date from general era)

metal wheel

proper paint scheme and appropriate roster of cars ( in my case 10% home road, 60% local cars and 30% misc. road name)

proper couplers

weathering/proper weight

general safety rules when switching/ proper speed

no fouling road crossing when spotting car

 setting standard i find is a good way to limit oneself, it also help improve the entire look and feel. layout might only have 4-5 cars on it but i know whats there will perform and look the way it should

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!