Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Will this work? Where do I go from here?

1210 views
3 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Will this work? Where do I go from here?
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 1, 2006 1:46 PM
I was all set to take up the roadbed and track the other day until I read your responses to how difficult/wasteful a process it can be. So I have been thinking some more.

Here is what I have:
-50 foot loop of flex track on cork roadbed in an “L- shape” on plywood topped benchwork.
-Limited knowledge.

Here is what I want:
-The track in the background to be at a higher elevation than that in the foreground.
-The same background track to run parallel to a cliff face with a river below.
-An agricultural valley in the foreground with necessary industries.
-A small yard, engine facility. (as simple/basic as possible)

Here is what I think I can do:
-Remove 16 feet of the straight track and roadbed that is in the background by using any means necessary for removal.
-Create a 1.5 or 2 percent grade and bring the track in the back up using 1.5 inch foam insulation sheets. I would only use a 1.5 foot wide piece and carve the river into it while having the track run atop.
-I would gradually slope the foam down to the plywood or basal elevation of the layout.

Here is what concerns me:
-The real life tracks I have seen for industry spurs and yards doesn’t have roadbed.
-The track I place shouldn’t be spiked directly to the plywood without roadbed either.
-Would it be possible to use small 1/8 sheets of cork as smaller roadbed for the spurs and yard areas without having issues?
-Would it be better to use traditional cork roadbed and build up the areas around the roadbed so it doesn’t look as if there is roadbed?


Thanks
Jacob
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Texas
  • 231 posts
Posted by bwftex on Wednesday, March 1, 2006 3:00 PM
You can go either way but if your sidings, spurs or yard areas are lower than the main line it will more realistic. Sheet cork works well and could be used to cover a whole yard area or cut in strips for a thin roadbed and it will still dampen some sound. The main thing to be sure of is that the transition from the main to a lower siding or spur is smooth and gradual enough that your locomotives and rolling stock will operate through it with out any problems. Bruce
  • Member since
    August 2001
  • From: Nebraska
  • 1,280 posts
Posted by RedGrey62 on Wednesday, March 1, 2006 4:41 PM
You could spike directly into the plywood, its a little more difficult but it can done. Since you say its and industry track, you won't have trains constantly running over it and the extra noise shouldn't matter. Like bwftex said, either way, make sure your vertical transitions are smooth.

Rick
"...Mother Nature will always punish the incompetent and uninformed." Bill Barney from Thor's Legions
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Central PA
  • 72 posts
Posted by onetrack64 on Thursday, March 2, 2006 1:39 PM
I've had good luck using Woodland Scenics foam roadbed for N scale ( I'm in HO). It is much thinner, and will still dampen the sound. Their foam will "crush" down pretty far...so you can make the transition from the mainline. After a little scenicking, you should be able to hide the roadbed.

A thought just crossed my mind. Has anyone ever sanded or otherwise thinned down the ties on their track?
What happened to all the color, why is everything in black and white?

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!