Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Question about scale

2209 views
16 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Arizona. Born And Raised In Chicago ILL.
  • 743 posts
Question about scale
Posted by ac4400fan on Thursday, September 15, 2005 7:14 PM
This might sound weird but is there a breaking point to scale lets say for instance can you use cars that are 1:72 scale and 1;87 ?

Thanks Carl..
GO> Chicago NorthWestern.BNSF& Illinios Central, AC4400 ALLTHE WAY! DREAM IT! PLAN IT! BUILD IT! Smile, Wink & Grin
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, September 15, 2005 7:15 PM
It's your railroad, you can do anything that you wish. There are no rules.

Bob Boudreau
  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: CSXT/B&O Flora IL
  • 1,937 posts
Posted by waltersrails on Thursday, September 15, 2005 7:43 PM
I use those on my HO scale layout. They look just fine. Also nice pic of CNW.

Waltersrails

http://ztrainman.tripod.com/
I like NS but CSX has the B&O.
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Thursday, September 15, 2005 8:06 PM
If you mix 1/72 people and vehicles with true HO vehicles the two scales will become obvious. If I was going to mix the two I would choose vehicles that don't have an absolute size, such as tractors or some trucks. Another strategy would be to put the 1/72 vehicles and people in the foreground, and the true HO stuff toward the back.

Dave H.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Minnesota
  • 659 posts
Posted by ericboone on Thursday, September 15, 2005 8:15 PM
I think it all depends upon how close the "out of scale" items are from other scale items. You just have to play with it and just see if it looks right.
I've intentionally used smaller scale items in the far corner of my first layout to make the layout appear deeper, which it defintely did. With drastic changes in scale, it is important to have a "scaleless" transition, such as brush or trees between the two items and always have the smaller scale item behind the larger scale item.
In a book by Dave Frary, he put an O scale figure, car, and tree at the front of his layout with a "scaleless" scrub brush filled ravine between the O scale and HO scale areas for a transition.
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Arizona. Born And Raised In Chicago ILL.
  • 743 posts
Posted by ac4400fan on Thursday, September 15, 2005 9:14 PM
Ok Heres an example the mustang is 1;67 i found this dodge magnum r/t its 1:72
does this look close ? i found alot of modern cars police ect this scale cheep paid $1.49 for it




Carl..
GO> Chicago NorthWestern.BNSF& Illinios Central, AC4400 ALLTHE WAY! DREAM IT! PLAN IT! BUILD IT! Smile, Wink & Grin
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • 2,844 posts
Posted by dinwitty on Thursday, September 15, 2005 9:48 PM
are you familiar with Disneyland? their main street stretch was designed with
perspective, if you looked down it it looked like a long distance.
You could find N scale cars and lay them in the background just for perspective.
1/72 is kinda midway between ho/S. S is 1/64. OO scale is about 1/80 ish, but runs on HO track.
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Mp 126 on the St. Louis District of NS's IL. Div.
  • 1,611 posts
Posted by icmr on Thursday, September 15, 2005 9:53 PM
[#ditto][#ditto][#ditto][#ditto]



ICMR

Happy Railroading.[swg][swg]
Illinois Central Railroad. Operation Lifesaver. Look, Listen, Live. Proud owner and user of Digitrax DCC. Visit my forum at http://icmr.proboards100.com For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. Let every thing that hath breath praise the Lord. Praise ye the Lord. Dream. Plan. Build.Smile, Wink & GrinSmile, Wink & Grin
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Culpeper, Va
  • 8,204 posts
Posted by IRONROOSTER on Saturday, September 17, 2005 6:08 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dinwitty

are you familiar with Disneyland? their main street stretch was designed with
perspective, if you looked down it it looked like a long distance.
You could find N scale cars and lay them in the background just for perspective.
1/72 is kinda midway between ho/S. S is 1/64. OO scale is about 1/80 ish, but runs on HO track.


OO is 1/76 (4mm/ft). The British version runs on HO track. This is well supported in Britain.

The US version used a more correct gauge of .750 inches. There was commercial support for it in the late 40's and 50's, but I don't think there is much now. There is SIG for it and their page http://www.getnet.com/~dickg/nmra/sigs/AmericanOO/AmericanOO.html has some historical information.
Enjoy
Paul
If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 3,150 posts
Posted by CNJ831 on Saturday, September 17, 2005 7:17 AM
One has to use a bit of caution when mixing scales, even those as seemingly close as 1:72 and 1:87, if you want of attain realism in a modeled scene . While a close mix will almost always photograph correctly (assuming the larger item is in the foreground) because the scene has been reduced to two dimensional, in person the effect often fails, especially if the scene is viewed roughly along its length rather than straight on.

Likewise, the illusion works much better if the particular layout section has significant depth, like a deep city scene, so the different vehicles end up well separated and the difference in scales is lost to the domination of the scene by large structures.

CNJ831
  • Member since
    November 2001
  • From: US
  • 732 posts
Posted by Javern on Saturday, September 17, 2005 8:54 AM
label your scene of mixed scale vehicles "pimp my ride"
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Guelph, Ont.
  • 1,476 posts
Posted by BR60103 on Sunday, September 18, 2005 9:06 PM
A lot may depend on your sensitivity to the items modelled. I have few problems with cars and trucks since I have no felling for how big they should be (generally, I often think scale vehicles are too big). People and doors are critical, but many other items come in varied sizes in real life.
Remember that toy items used to be sold for O and S scales.

--David

  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: Buffalo NY USA
  • 452 posts
Posted by edkowal on Monday, September 19, 2005 12:10 AM
The two scales you mention 1/72 and 1/87, are not really that close together. A model in 1/72 is going to be oversize by 21 % when compared to an HO (1/87) model.

So if you use an auto in 1/72 anywhere near a person or building, the car will be noticeably out of scale when compared to its surroundings. Comparing a figure in 1/72 to one in 1/87, the 1/72 figure would be nearly 7 feet tall compared to the 1/87 5 foot 9 inch figure, if both were designed to be 5 foot 9 inches in their proper scale.

In O scale, for instance, the autos tend to be 1/43 while everything else is 1/48. That's a discrepancy of about 12 % too large for the autos, and if you're not careful there, the difference can be noticed. So, with a difference about twice what the Oscalers are working with, the chances of running into trouble are magnified significantly. [:D]

-Ed

Five out of four people have trouble with fractions. -Anonymous
Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead. -Benjamin Franklin
"You don't have to be Jeeves to love butlers, but it helps." (Followers of Levi's Real Jewish Rye will get this one) -Ed K
 "A potted watch never boils." -Ed Kowal
If it's not fun, why do it ? -Ben & Jerry

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • 1,821 posts
Posted by underworld on Monday, September 19, 2005 12:15 AM
I have done that......just keep the 1/72s in a different area from the 1/87s. 1/72 to 1/87 isn't as noticeable as 1/32 to 1/24.

underworld

[:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]
currently on Tour with Sleeper Cell myspace.com/sleepercellrock Sleeper Cell is @ Checkers in Bowling Green Ohio 12/31/2009 come on out to the party!!! we will be shooting more video for MTVs The Making of a Metal Band
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • 1,821 posts
Posted by underworld on Monday, September 19, 2005 12:16 AM
Oh yeah....I've even used some 1/64 vehicles with 1/87. Placement is key.

underworld

[:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]
currently on Tour with Sleeper Cell myspace.com/sleepercellrock Sleeper Cell is @ Checkers in Bowling Green Ohio 12/31/2009 come on out to the party!!! we will be shooting more video for MTVs The Making of a Metal Band
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 19, 2005 12:38 AM
Not only placement, but also what type of car. If you've got yourself a big 4 wheel drive in 1/72, and a mini in 1/87 then the difference is greater. And as for the people hight difference between scales, l'm almost 7 foot, and have met people shorter that 5'9"!!! I'm sure everyone has. So that would only be modeling real life. Also, if the scale that is the larger happens to be a one of a kind object on a layout, like maybe a lambogini, then it would stand out worse. DD ;-D
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 19, 2005 10:38 AM
If anybody makes them 1:100 scale vehicles would probably mix well with 1:87.1 scale.

Bob DeWoody

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!