Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Tortoise VS Switchmaster

1490 views
3 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Tortoise VS Switchmaster
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, September 9, 2005 10:17 AM
If they had a fight who would win? What is the difference?
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
  • 13,757 posts
Posted by cacole on Friday, September 9, 2005 3:43 PM
The Tortoise moves it's rod, which is almost straight, back and forth through an enlarged hole under the center of the turnout. The SwitchMaster, aka TorqueMaster, is a motor that requires the actuating rod to be bent into an L shape at the top and bottom, and be fed up through the layout inside brass tubing, and is more difficult to install than a Tortoise.

Someone posted pictures of the innards of a Tortoise recently. The SwitchMaster is a gear-reduction, low voltage motor that appears to have been purchased as military surplus where it might have originally been designed to be used on aircraft as a servo motor.

  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: North Idaho
  • 1,311 posts
Posted by jimrice4449 on Friday, September 9, 2005 4:05 PM
Tortoise is easier to mount (see my post on "tortoise fool proof mount above) and it has two auxiliary contacts. To route power through my electrically dead frogs w/ a Switchmaster requires the use of a micro switch. When power to the Switchmaster is cut , the spring on the micro switch moves the points (of the micro switch) out of contact. When power is restored to the Switchmaster it can't overcome the micro switch spring (it only works when it can build up momentum from the opposite position).
The result is, unless I remember to reverse polarity on all of the Switchmasters (for which purpose I've installed a special DPDT switch on my control panels) I'll eventually run something into a switch for which the frog polarity doesn't match the track polarity.
Short answer...I've stopped using Switchmasters in favor of Tortoises and am (slowly) in the process of replacing the Switchmasters I've already installed.
If, after reading the above, you still want to go w/ Swichmasters I can make you a real good deal on some.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Friday, September 9, 2005 8:39 PM
I've seen a couple others too, besides Switchmaster, and every single one of them looks harder to install than a Tortoise, especially if you use a foam base like I do, instead of wood. Plus the Tortoise is the only one that has the contacts already for signalling and powering the frog. The others require you to also buy a microswitch or two, and mount that somehow that it gets pressed by the moving rod. So these other guys who claim to be cheaper than the Tortoise - maybe if you need to contacts. Add in the price of the microswitches and see where you stand. Tortoise is still the best. Priced high - because they are made int he USA. They'd be a fraction of the price if made elsewhere, but Circuitron is thus far resisting that temptation.

--Randy

Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!