QUOTE: Any suggestions for the DCC brand, I can invest around 300-400$ ? I will love to connect to computer and control the trains.
QUOTE: Will DCC also take care of turnouts ? I did not ready any where about turnouts . I want some good advanced way to control turnouts.
QUOTE: I have never used soldering before and I don't have any knowledge about circuits , wires.
https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling
Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.
Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's
Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.
Remember its your railroad
Allan
Track to the BRVRR Website: http://www.brvrr.com/
QUOTE: Originally posted by rrinker The 8 amp system would be WAY overkill for your size layout. But at least you are asking - we had a fellow come in to the LHS from 3/4 of the way across the state looking for help, his local shop sold him an 8-amp Super Chief to run his 4x8 Snap-Track layout. I really hate unscrupulous dealers who take advantage of customers like that. The nice advantage of using the Zephyr plus a DT400 is you end up with 2-4 throttles, not just one. The DT400, the Zephyr console, and if you have a pair of old DC packs, you can hook them to the 'Jump Ports' on the Zephyr and control 2 more trains. --Randy
Modeling BNSF and Milwaukee Road in SW Wisconsin
QUOTE: Originally posted by kenneth19usa On30Shay, I am planning to extend it, now I have changed the layout to 4X8. I want to still add some more layouts. I want to explore all the possibilities with Digitrax Zephyr. jsalemi - Can you please let me know some more detail of the turnouts. Do I need to drill my plywood for the turnouts. ? Do I need to do any soldering work ? How expensive they are ? Ken
Joe Fugate Modeling the 1980s SP Siskiyou Line in southern Oregon
QUOTE: Originally posted by jfugate Although turnout control can be connected to DCC, other than the "coolness" factor, I'm wondering why you feel turnouts need to be controlled by DCC? I find it's way simpler all the way around to just control the turnout with a switch or mechanism right on the fascia at the turnout. If you insist that DCC control the turnout, the complexity factor goes up (more money, more decoders, more mental load on your brain to figure out how to throw *that* turnout). Plus there's the notion of "non-railroad thoughts" when you are operating. Anything that reminds you you're running a MODEL will break the illusion. Real railroaders don't push a button on the throttle panel to throw the turnout in front of them. They either walk over to the turnout and operate something right at the turnout to throw it, or the dispatcher throws it for them via CTC. For a CTC panel, DCC could help, but unless you are going that route on your layout, I personally feel DCC controlled turnouts are overkill.
QUOTE: Originally posted by jfugate Bruce Chubb's CMRI system from the 1980s (and upgraded periodically with newer technology) allows a computer to interface with the railroad using standard serial cables (RS-232 and RS-485). You can throw turnouts, run signals, and even route power to the trains using progressive cab control. Because CMRI has been around for so long (and is constantly updated with newer boards and add ons), there's lots of options available at very affordable prices. DCC is the new kid on the block when it comes to hooking a computer to your layout, and has fewer options and generally will cost you more. DCC has the advantage that it's a standard, but CMRI has been so pervasive in the hobby for so many years that it's become a defacto standard as well for connecting a computer to your layout. For example, KAM software includes CMRI as well as DCC versions of their offerings. For more, see: http://www.jlcenterprises.net/index.htm http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CMRI_Users/