"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"
EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION
http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588
QUOTE: Originally posted by loathar Just curious. What makes the Peco switch so much better than the new atlas custom line code 83? Why is isolating the power so important if your only going to run DCC with no reverse loops? A little tip I pick up from CVMW is to use N gauge rail joiners instead of HO. They take a little more care to install but they don't stand out like a sore thumb. Then you can glue the rail bolt bars on at all your joints. I love the way this looks and it's a nice cheap detail loathar.
Visit look4trains.com
QUOTE: Originally posted by Boglwe Regarding atlas VS. Peco............... I have used both and currentlyu have one of each side by side on my layout. There is little difference, Except, Peco just kinda looks better ~shrugs~ Atlas does make good track (code 83 that is. Code 100 is junk). Peco just looks so much better!
QUOTE: Originally posted by tsasala I like the Peco turnouts, but the snap action is counter productive for my slow-motion switch machine. I guess I could of removed the spring, but I went with Walthers nevertheless. -Tom