Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

How good/bad are the current line of IHC trains?

1732 views
18 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Pa.
  • 3,361 posts
How good/bad are the current line of IHC trains?
Posted by DigitalGriffin on Sunday, May 1, 2005 12:43 PM
I'm looking to expand my RR empire. I have everything C&O/Virginian from LL, BLI, and Bachmann. (Man I can't wait for the reissue of the Rivarossi Allegheny) But until then I need to look elsewhere.

How are the modern IHC steam trains? They don't look DCC ready (but that really isn't a problem for me as I can fix it up.)

Do they run well at slow speeds? How's the power pickup?

Is there any one I'm overlooking? Perhaps I should start looking seriously at brass?

~D

Don - Specializing in layout DC->DCC conversions

Modeling C&O transition era and steel industries There's Nothing Like Big Steam!

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: San Jose, California
  • 3,154 posts
Posted by nfmisso on Sunday, May 1, 2005 1:06 PM
DG;

The recent IHC models run well, but are severely lacking in detail. The Heavy 4-8-2 Mountain is imho the best detailed, and also a C&O prototype. It is also great kitbash fodder for a N&W K1 or K2/K2a.

You may want to consider gettting an appropriate balance of locomotives for what you want your railroad to represent, rather than one of each........
Nigel N&W in HO scale, 1950 - 1955 (..and some a bit newer too) Now in San Jose, California
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Whitby, ON
  • 2,594 posts
Posted by CP5415 on Sunday, May 1, 2005 6:37 PM
The current line of IHC steam locos are not bad for the money.

I have a 4-6-2 & I love it.
True they are lacking in the detail dept but they run decently especially at slow speeds.
It's quiet, hauls quite a bit on level track & I've had no problem MUing it with almost every diesel I have in my fleet when the need for assistance on a grade is required.

Just my 2 cents

Gordon

Brought to you by the letters C.P.R. as well as D&H!

 K1a - all the way

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, May 1, 2005 6:46 PM
you really cant go wrong. They run pretty good and are a good base for superdetailing. You sure cant beat em for the money
  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 3,150 posts
Posted by CNJ831 on Sunday, May 1, 2005 7:01 PM
Mechanically they tend to be reasonably good runners. Detail is lacking and IHC has a nasty habit of swapping shells to create new locomotives, resulting in some strange engines without actual prototypes. Slow speed operation is fair but unlikely to be as good as the BLI or even the Bachmann.

If you just enjoy running trains and aren't any sort of rivet counter, you'll probably be happy. But, if at all possible, run the loco at the hobby shop first before taking it home to look for operating problems (probably good advice for purchasing anything but the really high-end engines).

CNJ831
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Metro East St. Louis
  • 5,743 posts
Posted by simon1966 on Sunday, May 1, 2005 8:18 PM
I have 3 of them. They all ran just fine on DC,but I have not got around to converting any of them to DCC, so they currently languish in boxes. I think they are very good value for money.

Simon Modelling CB&Q and Wabash See my slowly evolving layout on my picturetrail site http://www.picturetrail.com/simontrains and our videos at http://www.youtube.com/user/MrCrispybake?feature=mhum

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: indiana
  • 792 posts
Posted by joseph2 on Sunday, May 1, 2005 9:45 PM
I like my old Premier Series IHC 2-6-0.It has good enough detail and suitable low speed operation,dummy front coupler on it.I notice they are selling a PRR 4-6-4,which the PRR never had.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, May 1, 2005 10:09 PM
I've got a Premier 4-8-2 and converted it easily to DCC with decoder in tender. It's not a great puller, and seems to need lots of start voltage to get it moving. Once moving, its slow speed is good if the curves are greater than 18". (Stalls and spins on 18" curves when pulling 9 or 10 cars unless the speed is cranked up to 45 scale mph or better.)

Detail is very generic, though very kitbashable. Looks good with some weathering and painting the chrome rails black.

The part I dislike is the shiny wheels and side rods (which I intend to blacken one of these days) and the large wheel flanges. It will run on code 83 rail, however.

I paid $40 for it brand new on Ebay, and personally, wouldn't pay a dime more for another. Their $150 retail is way out of line when compared to Spectrum steam that you can get on Ebay for that price.

All that said, it is a reliable runner and has LOTS of hours of run time on it, without a glitch.

Just my $.02 worth.
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • 1,054 posts
Posted by grandeman on Saturday, May 21, 2005 10:59 PM
I've got two IHC Consolidations. They run well and respond well to detailing/weathering. They're nice engines for the $$$.
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Pacific Northwest
  • 3,864 posts
Posted by Don Gibson on Saturday, May 21, 2005 11:34 PM
MOST POS'T's carry the disclaimer " for the money".

In In other word's, 'Just barely Adequate',
Don Gibson .............. ________ _______ I I__()____||__| ||||| I / I ((|__|----------| | |||||||||| I ______ I // o--O O O O-----o o OO-------OO ###########################
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • 1,054 posts
Posted by grandeman on Saturday, May 21, 2005 11:38 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Don Gibson

MOST POS'T's carry the disclaimer " for the money".

In In other word's, 'Just barely Adequate',


Well, I've only got three steamers. Two IHC and one Athearn. I'd take the IHC's over the Athearn Genesis Mike anyday. I'ts been back to Athearn twice and doesn't run as well as the IHC's. With a little detailing the IHC's look as good as the Athearn. That's all I have to compare them to right now.
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Conemaugh Division
  • 389 posts
Posted by Pennsy58 on Monday, May 23, 2005 12:15 AM
I have four IHC steamers and they run fine. I'm not real big on detail level but they do lack somewhat. Being that I have digressed to reading glasses, if you take off your glasses the detail level is great.
They have good traction and have been dependable for me.
Converted my 2-8-0 B&LE to DCC and have been very pleased with it. As with any engine that is not DCC ready, there is some work involved but I didn't think it was hard to do. As a guess, I had it done in about 1 hour.
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Pacific NW
  • 733 posts
Posted by JohnT14808 on Monday, May 30, 2005 8:48 PM
Has anyone any experience with the 4-6-4 Hudsons that IHC currently is promoting? It seems that IHC is giving away extra stuff, just to sell these locomotives? Anyone purchase one of these Hudsons?
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • 1,054 posts
Posted by grandeman on Monday, May 30, 2005 8:55 PM
Those interested in IHC steam may find this worth reading.

http://www.trains.com/community/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=38141
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, May 30, 2005 11:52 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Don Gibson

MOST POS'T's carry the disclaimer " for the money".

In In other word's, 'Just barely Adequate',

I agree with you Don.

I also noticed the term generic. They are so generic that I can not recognize any of them for any prototype engine.

If they run good and you like them, use them, but don't expect IHC to pick a prototype and actually model it.

I would think that since BLI and most other companies have trended towards making models of prototype engines, IHC would pick a model and make it also. The USRA's have been produced, but are still a good engine to model since many roads used them.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 7:24 AM
I had one, a 4-6-2 steamer. Not DCC ready, but not too hard to convert. Ran quiet, fairly strong. Detail was so-so.
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 131 posts
Posted by scole100 on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 8:37 AM
They are a good running locomotive for the money. The Premier series can be upgraded to DCC no problem. They are light, so they do not pull all that well. They are very generic in appearance and down right plain if you run them next to new offerings from the other companies. I have got three, and will continue to use them. But someday, when finances allow, I will replace them with more accurate locomotives.
  • Member since
    April 2015
  • 329 posts
Posted by WilmJunc on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 11:26 AM
You get what you pay for... Plastic gears, no fly wheel, low weight, generic appearance. I personally do not think that they are easy to convert to DCC. Since they have no PC light board, the wires are not fed to a single location. Therefore a significant amount of soldering and splicing is necessary to convert them to DCC.

Modeling the B&M Railroad during the transition era in Lowell, MA

  • Member since
    April 2015
  • 329 posts
Posted by WilmJunc on Thursday, June 2, 2005 3:16 PM
Here's the latest posting on IHC

Modeling the B&M Railroad during the transition era in Lowell, MA

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!