Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

How heavily are you into this hobby?

3651 views
47 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Holly, MI
  • 1,269 posts
Posted by ClinchValleySD40 on Thursday, April 14, 2005 2:04 PM
Fairly large layout 60' x 30' multiple decks.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, April 14, 2005 2:15 PM
I too fit into more than one of those. I'm probably a collector and operator more than anything else right now - I enjoy building and improving locos and cars more than I enjoy working with scenery (hence my enthusiasm for shelf layouts - not much scenic work required!).
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: New Zealand
  • 462 posts
Posted by robengland on Thursday, April 14, 2005 2:29 PM
Looks like I didn't explain myself too well. I did in fact put some thought into this [:)]

The question was how far down the scale do you go in level of commitment to the hobby? See, committing yourself to a medium sized layout means you are going to be doing that for a long time with thousands of hours put in. Committing yourself to making a Walthers kit is not the same thing.

So I tried to order the options in an increasing scale of the commitment required.

And it is a scale so the question is which is the largest commitment you have made? If you have both a basement layout and a photo diorama then the basement layout is where you put yourself on the scale. therefore there need be only once answer.

(as a matter of fact, I don't think the forum polls technicaly support multiple answers, johncolley)
Rob Proud owner of the a website sharing my model railroading experiences, ideas and resources.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, April 14, 2005 3:09 PM
Although I don't have a layout I own enough track to make a swicthyard 30x 50 sq feet
not includtng a 600ft mainline (lots of curves).Thats enough track to go around my
house 3 times.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, April 14, 2005 3:14 PM
Belive me ! Like most of you modelers I could fit in all the categories.[(-D][(-D][(-D][(-D][(-D][(-D][(-D][(-D][(-D]
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • 933 posts
Posted by aloco on Friday, April 15, 2005 1:37 AM
Too heavily. All of my other hobbies have suffered because of it. But I can't help it.... I just... like trains and that's all there is to it! Trains are better! I used to go on locomotive painting binges, but lately I've only had little spasms and twinges. I did a couple this year, but I think the fleet has gotten pretty much where I want it to be. So now is the time to just sit back and run trains.
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Ozark Mountains
  • 1,167 posts
Posted by dragenrider on Saturday, April 16, 2005 1:06 AM
Medium size layout, but as for commitement...

Well, lets just say I would do more than eat, breath & sleep model railroading, but I can't find the time. [^]

The Cedar Branch & Western--The Hillbilly Line!

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: New Zealand
  • 462 posts
Posted by robengland on Sunday, April 17, 2005 4:38 PM
I'm intrigued that 2/3 of respondents have a big layout. I'd have thought there were a lot more dabblers and armchairs on a forum. Just proves this is THE forum, eh? [:)]
Rob Proud owner of the a website sharing my model railroading experiences, ideas and resources.
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Sunday, April 17, 2005 4:50 PM
I have a minimal layout,juat two parallel straight tracks,about 4 1/2 to 5 ft. long connected by a crossover.I have a fairly large collection of locos and cars,though,so I would fit into at least two categories.
Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • 901 posts
Posted by nickinwestwales on Sunday, April 17, 2005 5:13 PM
I`m working in 16`x10` on a `rising spiral` on 3 levels. I`m about 7 years in but with the last 4 lost to child care,stopping the cottage collapsing around our ears,keeping the band on the road et al. Also the aforementioned 16x10 is in an uninsulated shed in Wales,where it rains enough to rot holly. as much time is spent on maintenance as progress. I guess it boils down to priorities-right now ME time is fairly low on the list but theres always tomorrow!! regards,nick
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, April 17, 2005 7:03 PM
26 x 35 room full of trains! I like to collect, run , and research anything about railroads! Im also involved heavily on planning my clubs new 29 x 21 sized layout!
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: California
  • 3,722 posts
Posted by AggroJones on Monday, April 18, 2005 12:42 PM
The "hobby" consumes me.

My enthusiasm isn't preportionate to my layout size. I must work in my cluttered 9 x 11 bedroom. But thats better than a kick in the b*lls, right?

"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"

EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION

http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: New Zealand
  • 462 posts
Posted by robengland on Tuesday, April 26, 2005 3:57 PM
Aggro, if you can produce what you do in HO in a 9x11 bedroom then any space is a usable space. It's guys like you that keep me sane, and keep my dreams of empire restrained.
Rob Proud owner of the a website sharing my model railroading experiences, ideas and resources.
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Rhode Island
  • 2,216 posts
Posted by davekelly on Tuesday, April 26, 2005 4:12 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by robengland


The question was how far down the scale do you go in level of commitment to the hobby? See, committing yourself to a medium sized layout means you are going to be doing that for a long time with thousands of hours put in. Committing yourself to making a Walthers kit is not the same thing.

So I tried to order the options in an increasing scale of the commitment required.



I don't think the size of a layout necessarily equals a "commitment" to the hobby. Just as being able to buy 30 Kato diesels vice scratchbuilding a rare prototype shows doesn't show more commitment. Amount of disposible income spent on trains does not equal commitment.

Ben King was one of the most heavily into the hobby person around, yet had a smaller layout. Some folks fill a basement with benchwork, lay track and then run trains maybe once a month - not much commitment there compared to Mr. King. I don't know if there's a way to compare the commitment necessary to filling a basement with a layout (which if you have enough funds you can hire someone to do) to scratchbuilding a couple of dozen steam engines in S scale.

Just my opinion (standing by for direct fire!).

Dave

If you ain't having fun, you're not doing it right and if you are having fun, don't let anyone tell you you're doing it wrong.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 26, 2005 7:37 PM
Small to medium sized layout (12x12), and I kinda move in spurts. I'll go for a month or so of just browsing through this forum and reading my MR, then the mood will strike, I'll get a lull in hours at work, and I'll be down in the basement every spare moment, hitting the LHS's every payday, etc. Especially now that I'm at the detailing stage, and I'm still haven't got my DCC hooked up or all my decoders installed, I'm kinda laying low. Sure enough though, the bug will bite soon.
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: New Zealand
  • 462 posts
Posted by robengland on Tuesday, April 26, 2005 8:27 PM
maybe "commitment" isn't quite the right word. I guess I'm talking about the scale of the task taken on, as in my preamble to this poll. How MUCH are you trying to do?

I'm a bit humbled by the proportion of respondents who are taking on a whole basement/attic. I'm struggling with half a car-space right now.

I agree, Dave, that size of a layout isn't a perfect measure and Ben King is an excellent example of why not: folk can put as much effort into a square foot as others put into a square yard. But it is a reasonable first estimate - a crude measure.
Rob Proud owner of the a website sharing my model railroading experiences, ideas and resources.
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Rhode Island
  • 2,216 posts
Posted by davekelly on Tuesday, April 26, 2005 11:24 PM
robengland,

Good point. Humbled by those that have a whole basement? I'm big time jealous!! BTW: I'll take your half car space! [:D][:D][:D]

Too bad there isn't a way to do some sort of multi dimensional poll. Such a poll would incorporate a bunch of parameters: layout size, percent kitbash, scratchbuilt, scale etc etc. Could be interesting!

Of course I do think those that read the posts on this forum and post responses to questions or ask questions themselves are probably more heavily into this hobby than the average. Don't have anything to back it up, just a gut feeling.

I will say though that it appears that the average person on this forum is way heavily into having fun and helping others!
If you ain't having fun, you're not doing it right and if you are having fun, don't let anyone tell you you're doing it wrong.
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 12:58 AM
I'm good for 6 catagories over my lifetime, armchair, collect, crew, club, module, and massive layout / do it for a living, not all at once of course. Trains are my life.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!