Login
or
Register
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Home
»
Model Railroader
»
Forums
»
General Discussion (Model Railroader)
»
I wish I would have introduced this standard practice sooner...
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="SeeYou190"]</p> <p>I like as variety of rail sizes, all the way down to code 40.</p> <p>.</p> <p>On STRATTION & GILLETTE layout #4 I had a siding that was code 40 soldered to PC board ties. It was only about 20" long, but that super-light rail made quite an impact. There will be at least one foreground siding on the new layout with this rail.</p> <p>.</p> <p>-Kevin</p> <p>.</p> <div style="clear:both;"> </div> <p>[/quote]</p> <p>Not sure if I'm going that light on my railroad, but I wish I had not purchased a whole bunch of code 100 turnouts (and built my previous layout almost entirely with code 100). </p> <p>I found a website that discusses rail codes vs weight. Looks like I should be using code 70 for just about everything, if not somewhat smaller (does anyone sell code 65 or code 60 rail for handlaying?). </p> <p>Found this website to be useful:</p> <p>http://wpporter.worthygems.com/railweight.php</p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Users Online
There are no community member online
Search the Community
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter
See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter
and get model railroad news in your inbox!
Sign up