Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
I really don't think the Digitrax vs NCE argument is being very helpful, it seems to me that there are good things about both systems, and a lot of the bikkering here is about really technical stuff that isn't all that important to the end user who isn't a techy. Like some of the folks in the earlier posts I can only speak from personal experience and preference. If you get the chance test the system - preferably on a layout so you get a feel of how it handles in an operating session - before you buy, so much the better. But also have a good read of the manufacturers litterature and you will get a feel of how their sytem works. You'll generally either love the way it works or hate it - this is personal preference so there is no right or wrong. Most folks in the UK, me included, run small layouts so one of the "entry level" systems is ideal. I use a Digitrax Zephyr, which I find excellent - but I also know people who use CVP, Lenz 90 and Compact (the Atlas Commander is sold as the Lenz Compact over here, showing its real origin) or also a wierd and wacky home-built system. I know of no-one here in the UK with an NCE system - simple reason - its way too expensive for most. Although I like the look of the system it was never an option for me on expense grounds alone, just like the Digitax Chief. Why do I like the Zephyr over the other entry level systems? <ul><li> I like the Digitrax button-for-everything style of throttle, I don't like having to scroll through addresses like on Lenz </li><li> Being able to run an analog loco on address 00 is really useful (and I really don't give a monkeys nuts whether its NMRA compliant or not)</li><li> The Zephyr has proved to be more robust than the Lenz Compact "in the field" - I know of one guy who switched to DCC using a Lenz Compact on his exhibition layout - after blowing the second Compact he switched to a Zephyr and hasn't looked back </li><li> The Zephyr is completely compatable with the rest of Digitrax's range of throttles; the IR wireless function of the DT300 & 400 is particularly useful - as its illegal to import or use US frequency radio throttles in the UK. I don't know if the XPA cordless phone adapter for Lenz is available here or not, if it is then thats another plus point for Lenz too </li><li> The ability to read back CVs is a must, only the Zephyr and the Compact/Commander offer this at budget level </li></ul> One of the few down sides to Digitrax has already been mentioned here - their decoder manual is not user friendly[xx(]. I just wi***hey'd sack their technical writer and get someone else to re-write it in plain English. Bang for buck though you just can't beat the Zephyr, particularly as it gives you loads of advanced features with complete expandability. The Atlas Commander/ Lenz Compact is a close second and really that's it at budget level. However, depending on the pricing the MRC Advanced Progidy might just give Digitrax and Lenz some useful competition.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag

Update Reply

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Model Railroader Newsletter See all

Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!

Subscriber & Member Login

Edit post

Post Body

Tags (Optional)

Subscriber & Member Login

Users Online

Search the Community