Login
or
Register
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Home
»
Model Railroader
»
Forums
»
General Discussion (Model Railroader)
»
A novel thought about licensing fallen flags....
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
(copied from that Other thread... wish I could have easily linked this instead) <br /> <br /> ... and then there' s the possibility that a model manufacturer can claim unfair trade practice ... that the UP charges more for a license than it's worth, and that other "features" of their agreement are onerous and can bankrupt a modelling manufacturer. <br /> <br />There's these questions - for instance- <br /> <br />If the UP wants the molds and templates of produicts "no longer in production" (if that's what they specify)... <br />How would the UP make an assetion that the railroad is entitled to its possession without having "ordered" or "specified" or otherwise compensated the manufacturer for the product? <br /> <br />What constitutes a cessation of production? A year? a month? A break for vacation? A wait for resupply of materials? (Athearn is NOW selling a flat car with load that I bought in 1962!) <br /> <br />Does the UP intend to cover shipping of tooling from China? <br /> <br />Any financial burden attached to the model manufacturer can come with the assertion that it is intended to drive them from the business without any criminal act other thatn using what is obvious to the casual observer - and is thus an unfair trade pracice. <br /> <br />Not that I'd encourage anyone to use a TM without permission... but the UP needs to examine how this opens the UP to legal complaint and what this enforcement does to its _potential_ licensees. <br />---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- <br /> <br />And then there's the possibility that the RR's can use those un-heralded cars as rolling billboards... the income would FAR surpass the licensing fees! <br /> <br />And- to further the arguements expressed above by dehusman - the company that made _Fruit of the Loom_ underwear was not "Fruit of the Loom"... FotL was a trademark - only! The company made Nothing! And it (the TM) was owned by a railroad (one of those with Pacific in its name - I recall NP... I may be wrong). <br />
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Users Online
There are no community member online
Search the Community
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter
See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter
and get model railroad news in your inbox!
Sign up