Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Huge home layout: The Twin Lakes Terminal & Transfer

3028 views
6 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2009
  • 195 posts
Huge home layout: The Twin Lakes Terminal & Transfer
Posted by JDL56 on Monday, April 6, 2015 10:43 AM

From 1985-2005, one of the largest home layouts in Winnipeg was Ray Goy's Twin Lakes Terminal & Transfer. The five-level layout, which featured mid-western railroading in the 1960s-70s near a Chicago-like big city, filled every inch of Ray's 1,250 square foot basement.

How big was it? Put it this way: It had between 700-800 turnouts, of which 80 were double-slip.

The layout has been gone ten years, but photos can be seen for the first time on my blog at http://cprailmmsub.blogspot.ca/2015/04/great-model-railroad-twin-lakes.html 

John Longhurst, Winnipeg

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Bradford, Ontario
  • 15,797 posts
Posted by hon30critter on Tuesday, April 7, 2015 1:18 AM

Hi John

Mr. Goy's railroad is almost too big to comprehend! The fact that it was DC is also amazing. I'm a bit humbled by the whole thing.

I just decided to put one double slip into my layout plan and I thought that was a big deal! I guess not.

Thanks for sharing.

Dave

I'm just a dude with a bad back having a lot of fun with model trains, and finally building a layout!

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Tuesday, April 7, 2015 6:36 AM

What caused the layout to come to an end?

I notice, by way of observation, a few things about the layout.

It is in unfinished basement, like mine.

The track is unballasted.

The height of the layout is quite high.

Interesting.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 7, 2015 9:42 AM

It may just be this picture showing the unfinished section of this huge layout, but, generally speaking, layouts of this size and type really don´t catch my fancy. I prefer small, but highly detailed and atmospheric layouts.

For no money in the world would I want to have such a behemoth! Just think of the hours you have to spend cleaning the track Laugh

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: 4610 Metre's North of the Fortyninth on the left coast of Canada
  • 9,352 posts
Posted by BATMAN on Tuesday, April 7, 2015 9:52 AM

I'm with Ulrich on this one. As time goes by I am thinking my current layout is just the right size. I have the room to more than double the size if I choose and that was the plan, but I think I have changed my mind about that. Detailing is where my efforts will go.

 

 

Brent

"All of the world's problems are the result of the difference between how we think and how the world works."

  • Member since
    May 2011
  • 743 posts
Posted by Steven S on Tuesday, April 7, 2015 7:14 PM

Sir Madog
...but, generally speaking, layouts of this size and type really don´t catch my fancy. I prefer small, but highly detailed and atmospheric layouts.

 

I agree.  Look at how close the levels are.  How does anyone see what's happening on the lower levels? It's so big, scenery seems to be an afterthought.

I'd much rather visit a layout like Lance Mindheim's.

 

Steve S

  • Member since
    August 2009
  • 195 posts
Posted by JDL56 on Tuesday, April 7, 2015 11:15 PM

I think Ray would agree that he just got started and things sort of kept going. His next layout will be smaller.

John

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!