Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

BIG MODERN LAYOUTS!

5749 views
29 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2010
  • 115 posts
BIG MODERN LAYOUTS!
Posted by UPTeen23 on Monday, August 22, 2011 1:56 PM

Hello all, I haven't been around much this summer but now I'm backYeah Smile, Wink & Grin and have a strange curiosity. By no means am I trying to offend those with large transition era layouts. They are wonderful. However, I am curious in why MRR tends to only cover small modern (1990-present) layouts. I have to admit, it seems like most contemporary layouts are small. This could be due to the fact that the younger crowd is the most interested so they are not retired. I bring this up because people who aren't retired tend to have less space because of kids and such. Maybe this is true but I still wonder. Why aren't there many BIG (600+ square feet) Layouts? If i am wrong, and I hope I am, why aren't they being featured in MRR??? 

  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: THE FAR, FAR REACHES OF THE WILD, WILD WEST!
  • 3,672 posts
Posted by R. T. POTEET on Monday, August 22, 2011 2:04 PM

Six hundred square feet is a basement-sized space; observe the demographics of the past 30 years and you will find that there has been a considerable shift in population from the Northeast and Midwest into the South and Southwest where basements are less common. Therefore 12' X 12' spare bedrooms have become more popular as layout locations.

From the far, far reaches of the wild, wild west I am: rtpoteet

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Crosby, Texas
  • 126 posts
Posted by Knowcents on Monday, August 22, 2011 3:00 PM
Jeff Clodfelter Santa Fe "Knowcents Division"
  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Clearlake, California. USA
  • 869 posts
Posted by Lake on Monday, August 22, 2011 3:22 PM

You must not be into N-scale as there seems to many large 500 sq ft plus layouts in the N scale magazines.

Ken G Price   My N-Scale Layout

Digitrax Super Empire Builder Radio System. South Valley Texas Railroad. SVTRR

N-Scale out west. 1996-1998 or so! UP, SP, Missouri Pacific, C&NW.

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Monday, August 22, 2011 3:41 PM

I believe there are many reasons to include limited hobby budgets  versus the  high hobby costs which makes smaller layouts more attractive..I have also notice a growth of modern design switching layouts that focus on super details,sound equipped locomotive and highly detailed  freight cars while limiting the amount of track and structures-in fact a lot of structures are scratch built 1/2 buildings and computer enhance building flats along the backdrop and we can also add limited hobby time to that mixture due to work and family time.

 

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: US
  • 2,455 posts
Posted by wp8thsub on Monday, August 22, 2011 3:47 PM

It seems that most of the layouts I encounter in person are transition era to early 1960s too.  There is a much smaller pool of layouts (of any size) depicting modern railroading, so less material for the magazines to draw from. 

One of the nicer and more ambitious large home layouts with a modern theme is John Parker's BNSF.  It's about 3000 square feet worth.  See http://www.bnsfrr.net/ . 

Rob Spangler

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Culpeper, Va
  • 8,202 posts
Posted by IRONROOSTER on Monday, August 22, 2011 3:50 PM

When you read the articles you'll find that a lot of these big layouts are decades in the works.  So there hasn't been enough time for folks to get them built. Of course when they do, they won't be the modern era anymore. Oops  

Also the transition era being by far the most popular there just aren't that many people in the modern era.  It's the same with the 1880's, 1900's, 1920's, and so forth.  There are some but not that many.

Enjoy

Paul

If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
  • Member since
    August 2010
  • 115 posts
Posted by UPTeen23 on Monday, August 22, 2011 3:55 PM

Layouts like John Parker's are exactly what I mean. His is amazing. And no I don't mean N scale but if you know of any that are West Coast ish themed let me know. I m focused more on HO scale but Im willing to look at large West Coast layouts.

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • 122 posts
Posted by D94R on Monday, August 22, 2011 4:08 PM

The comment about decades in the making for the large basement sized layouts is correct.  Unless you find someone who has an unlimited budget and doesn't work you probably won't find anyone who builds a magazine quality layout that is basement filling in only a few years. 

 

My Uncles basement sized layout started in the mid-late 80's, and it's only been within the last 5 years that he has been able to get magazine features. Albeit small ones, and not yet in MRR. 

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Ft. Wayne Indiana Home of the Lake Division
  • 574 posts
Posted by Ibflattop on Monday, August 22, 2011 4:10 PM

Have ya checked out any of the Great Model Railroads videos?????

Home of the NS Lake Division.....(but NKP and Wabash rule!!!!!!!! ) :-) NMRA # 103172 Ham callsign KC9QZW
Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,217 posts
Posted by tstage on Monday, August 22, 2011 4:37 PM

UPTeen23

Why aren't there many BIG (600+ square feet) Layouts? If i am wrong, and I hope I am, why aren't they being featured in MRR??? 

UPteen,

I think the points that you've raised are some legitimate reasons why there aren't many large modern layouts.  BIG layouts cost BIG money and require BIG space (aka BIG house) and BIG time with a BIG budget to cover the BIG tab.  Even a modest layout these days can go into the thousands of dollars.  Add kids and other responsibilities and - unless you have someone else build the layout for you - your basement empire is going to take a lonnnnnnng time to come to fruition.

With MR and big modern layouts: They are most likely trying to balance the appeal of the magazine to the mass "budgets" and interests of their clientele.  Most modelers are retired and, as you pointed out, interested in the transition periods that they grew up with.  Although I'm not retired, my love for trains tends to find pleasure in both steam and early diesel.

Like yourself, that doesn't mean that I can't or don't enjoy a layout that is modeled outside my era.  I can still learn many useful techniques and appreciate the artistry of guys like Pelle Soeborg and Lance Mindheim.  However, I love the "variety" of locomotives and the modern era just doesn't allow for that - i.e. at least from my perspective.  Most SDs all start looking the same after a while.

Also, in the US, there are probably more 4 x 8 layouts that any other configuration.  If you are talking European layouts, that would be considered a medium size layout, as most are smaller than that because of lack of space.

And bigger doesn't necessarily mean better.  A well-designed small layout can allow you plenty of action and interest that a "not well thought out" large layout lacks.  Also, most modern locomotives are six-axle and require the large radii curves to make them both operate well and look good doing it.

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 2,499 posts
Posted by caldreamer on Monday, August 22, 2011 5:00 PM

My N scale Golden State Railroad is 12 1/2 by 39 feet.  It will include a working hump yard with 10 classification tracks.

Here are the classifiction tracks with the hump in the background.

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Monday, August 22, 2011 5:31 PM

Also the transition era being by far the most popular there just aren't that many people in the modern era.  It's the same with the 1880's, 1900's, 1920's, and so forth.  There are some but not that many.

Enjoy

Paul

---------------------

Paul,I'm not so sure considering the number of "modern"  cars and locomotives being release if we say 1970-20011 is "modern"...Is there a real cutoff date between "modern" eras? I simply don't know but,realize that is food for thought and a whole topic within its self..

As a observation I've notice a lot of "modern" short line locomotives and cars being offered..

I never really understood  that trend unless some of the smaller short lines are being modeled?

 

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Holly, MI
  • 1,269 posts
Posted by ClinchValleySD40 on Monday, August 22, 2011 6:01 PM

Mine is big (1800 sq ft) but set in 1980.   So I doubt if you'd call it modern.   One of the guys in our round robin has a modern day U.P. layout that is pretty big

http://www.semichops.org/Layouts/BME/layout.html

See ya

 

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Culpeper, Va
  • 8,202 posts
Posted by IRONROOSTER on Monday, August 22, 2011 6:55 PM

BRAKIE

Also the transition era being by far the most popular there just aren't that many people in the modern era.  It's the same with the 1880's, 1900's, 1920's, and so forth.  There are some but not that many.

Enjoy

Paul

---------------------

Paul,I'm not so sure considering the number of "modern"  cars and locomotives being release if we say 1970-20011 is "modern"...Is there a real cutoff date between "modern" eras? I simply don't know but,realize that is food for thought and a whole topic within its self..

As a observation I've notice a lot of "modern" short line locomotives and cars being offered..

I never really understood  that trend unless some of the smaller short lines are being modeled?

 

Larry, you may be right if you go from 1970-2011, but the OP was talking 1990-2011.  I agree though, once you're past the last of steam, it's hard to define an era.  But I think if you take history in smaller chunks of 10-12 years, 1947-1958 is most popular.

Enjoy

Paul

If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
  • Member since
    December 2008
  • From: Heart of Georgia
  • 5,406 posts
Posted by Doughless on Monday, August 22, 2011 8:00 PM

UPTeen23

I am curious in why MRR tends to only cover small modern layouts.

Because covering a basement-sized modern layout; which would be populated with nothing but six axle wide cabs pulling either unit double stacks, unit coal hoppers, or unit grain hoppers; would be boring.  Big Smile

- Douglas

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Clearlake, California. USA
  • 869 posts
Posted by Lake on Monday, August 22, 2011 9:46 PM

Doughless

 

 UPTeen23:

 

I am curious in why MRR tends to only cover small modern layouts.

 

 

Because covering a basement-sized modern layout; which would be populated with nothing but six axle wide cabs pulling either unit double stacks, unit coal hoppers, or unit grain hoppers; would be boring.  Big Smile

Doughless: If that is your thoughts on more modern railroading Hmmthen I can tell you must not do any. So sad.Sad

The unit double stacks, unit coal hoppers, unit tank or unit grain hoppers are what one may see on the mains from ports or mines, but once they get there the trains are broken down and the cars are mixed with other types and sent on their  way to subdivisions and branch line yards for distribution to the final destination. Many cars transporting goods will never part of unit trains.

So thereMischief My My 2 Cents

Ken G Price   My N-Scale Layout

Digitrax Super Empire Builder Radio System. South Valley Texas Railroad. SVTRR

N-Scale out west. 1996-1998 or so! UP, SP, Missouri Pacific, C&NW.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, August 22, 2011 10:44 PM

It´s a strange world we live in! Laugh

Many times, the Kalmbach folks have been "accused" of only featuring "big" layouts in MR, now we see the opposite of that. Laugh

It could very well be, that, in the times of economic turmoil, there are less big layouts being built, but first of all, Kalmbach relies on reader contributions to fill the monthly issue. So here is a call to all builders/owners of big layouts to write an article about their layout. And one to the ones building small layouts as well!

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Tuesday, August 23, 2011 3:49 AM

Doughless

 UPTeen23:

I am curious in why MRR tends to only cover small modern layouts.

 

Because covering a basement-sized modern layout; which would be populated with nothing but six axle wide cabs pulling either unit double stacks, unit coal hoppers, or unit grain hoppers; would be boring.  Big Smile

Add general freights,Amtrak,locals,and reefer trains(UP/CSX),older SD40-2s,GP40-2s,GP38-2s,SW1500sGP15s,MP15s and other 4 axle locomotives  then you may be spot on..

There's more to modern railroading then most think..

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: upstate NY
  • 9,236 posts
Posted by galaxy on Tuesday, August 23, 2011 5:34 AM

The beauty of a smaller layout is that it can be expanded to make it "grow up" to a bigger layout.

Many people do not have the space to dedicate to a larger layout. Not everybody has a whole basement/2 car garage/attic/warehouse in which to build a layout.

Many people don't have the money to accomodate a larger layout's expenses.

You can always "build to suit tenant" your layout based on your space.

Also there HAS been a bit of a shift at MRR just  to show what can be done with smaller layouts- from 4x8's and up. MAny people complained to MRR they didn't have the space for a 15 foot x 30 foot ginormus layout and "what could be done with a 4x8 or 5x9?"

If you have the space and want to build big...then look at MRR's larger layout plans for ideas and plans.

-G .

Just my thoughts, ideas, opinions and experiences. Others may vary.

 HO and N Scale.

After long and careful thought, they have convinced me. I have come to the conclusion that they are right. The aliens did it.

  • Member since
    December 2008
  • From: Heart of Georgia
  • 5,406 posts
Posted by Doughless on Tuesday, August 23, 2011 11:50 AM

BRAKIE

 Doughless:

 UPTeen23:

I am curious in why MRR tends to only cover small modern layouts.

 

Because covering a basement-sized modern layout; which would be populated with nothing but six axle wide cabs pulling either unit double stacks, unit coal hoppers, or unit grain hoppers; would be boring.  Big Smile

 

Add general freights,Amtrak,locals,and reefer trains(UP/CSX),older SD40-2s,GP40-2s,GP38-2s,SW1500sGP15s,MP15s and other 4 axle locomotives  then you may be spot on..

There's more to modern railroading then most think..

I model modern era in a 35 x 13 space, so I'm not unfamiliar with the ideas.  I was just poking fun at how the prototypes have consolidated some of the variety out of railroading relative to the transition era.  Variety is still out there, I think it just takes more effort to find it. 

 

- Douglas

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Clearlake, California. USA
  • 869 posts
Posted by Lake on Tuesday, August 23, 2011 3:38 PM

Ops, double post.

Ken G Price   My N-Scale Layout

Digitrax Super Empire Builder Radio System. South Valley Texas Railroad. SVTRR

N-Scale out west. 1996-1998 or so! UP, SP, Missouri Pacific, C&NW.

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Clearlake, California. USA
  • 869 posts
Posted by Lake on Tuesday, August 23, 2011 3:43 PM

Doughless

 

 BRAKIE:

 

 

 Doughless:

 

 UPTeen23:

I am curious in why MRR tends to only cover small modern layouts.

 

 

Because covering a basement-sized modern layout; which would be populated with nothing but six axle wide cabs pulling either unit double stacks, unit coal hoppers, or unit grain hoppers; would be boring.  Big Smile

 

 

Add general freights,Amtrak,locals,and reefer trains(UP/CSX),older SD40-2s,GP40-2s,GP38-2s,SW1500sGP15s,MP15s and other 4 axle locomotives  then you may be spot on..

There's more to modern railroading then most think..

 

 

I model modern era in a 35 x 13 space, so I'm not unfamiliar with the ideas.  I was just poking fun at how the prototypes have consolidated some of the variety out of railroading relative to the transition era.  Variety is still out there, I think it just takes more effort to find it. 

Fun poking accepted.Smile, Wink & Grin

Ken G Price   My N-Scale Layout

Digitrax Super Empire Builder Radio System. South Valley Texas Railroad. SVTRR

N-Scale out west. 1996-1998 or so! UP, SP, Missouri Pacific, C&NW.

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • From: Indiana
  • 3,549 posts
Posted by Flashwave on Tuesday, August 23, 2011 3:54 PM

When I grow up, I want to model a BIG MODERN layout.

And by that, a nice, big layout of a modern class 3 railroad lugginf sotrage cars up to the interchange, and bringing back the switching for the loacl companies.

Yep, GP10, SD7s, and Gensets walking 40 car trains of Autoracks and empty hoppers over hill and dale for Detroit, or to be whisked off to the Indiana Rairlaod to feed the hungry needs of Indy Power & Light. And on their way back, they drag down cars bound for a Co-Op, some metal strips for an Armor factory (it's really there, Madison Armor in Indiana), then walking what's left of their train, a few insulated boxcars, a reefer. maybe a trash flat for the restoration crew working on the old cotton mill, down a 6% grade and into the street.

With plenty of room to do the scenery.

 

-Morgan

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Whitby, ON
  • 2,594 posts
Posted by CP5415 on Tuesday, August 23, 2011 7:33 PM

TA462

 

 Doughless:

 

 

 UPTeen23:

I am curious in why MRR tends to only cover small modern layouts.

 

 

Because covering a basement-sized modern layout; which would be populated with nothing but six axle wide cabs pulling either unit double stacks, unit coal hoppers, or unit grain hoppers; would be boring.  Big Smile

 

 

Not if you model the Ontario Northland Railway.  Yes

 

Especially if you're modeling the ONR passenger service Dave!

GP38, F7/9B, ex-GO passenger cars!

A modeler's dream! Pretty much anything goes!

Gordon

Brought to you by the letters C.P.R. as well as D&H!

 K1a - all the way

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: US
  • 973 posts
Posted by jmbjmb on Tuesday, August 23, 2011 11:02 PM

When I started in model railroading, I was modeling modern railroads.  Of course, modern at the time was SD40s, and GP38s in SR tuxedo and SCL black and yellow.  Tried to stay current for a little while, but at first settled into a 77-81 period, but now, mainly due to space limitations, have migrated backward to the 50s. 

I have some modern era cars I've collected and they just don't look right on my small HO layout.  Because of the room shape, I had to go with fairly tight radius curves 18-24 inches, and short sidings.  I can get 4-5 1950's era cars, locomotive, and caboose, 3-4 1980 era cars, or 2 modern cars into that same siding.  Even though the trains are basically the same physical length, the one with more cars looks more like a train and offers more switching opportunity.  I've even toyed with the idea of an early 1900s layout, but haven't gone there yet.  Modern equipment is so large, it's almost like stepping up from one scale to the next in space requirements.

So I'm in the group that believes space limitations in modern houses will limit the number of large layouts of any era out there. 

 

  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: US
  • 2,455 posts
Posted by wp8thsub on Wednesday, August 24, 2011 12:00 AM

jmbjmb

So I'm in the group that believes space limitations in modern houses will limit the number of large layouts of any era out there. 

I'm not so sure about this myself.  The average square footage of a new single family home in the US has increased from about 1000 in 1950, to 1400 in 1970, to 2700 in 2009 (per one set of stats I Googled, they vary somewhat).  At the same time average family size decreased, further increasing square footage per person.  The idea of ever-shrinking train rooms has been repeated a lot in the hobby.  I wonder what the actual data would show, and whether it could be refined by modeled era. 

Rob Spangler

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • 933 posts
Posted by aloco on Wednesday, August 24, 2011 3:14 AM

Doughless

 

 

Because covering a basement-sized modern layout; which would be populated with nothing but six axle wide cabs pulling either unit double stacks, unit coal hoppers, or unit grain hoppers; would be boring.  Big Smile

 

I actually don't mind looking at some of the modern era rolling stock.  I'm not crazy about unit trains of containers, but there is an interesting variety of hopper cars, gondolas, and tank cars.

My only complaint about the modern era is that none of the locomotive builders make an end cab switcher any more.   The new Genset locos are kind of neat looking (although not an end cab type), but where I live it looks like the two major railways have no intentions of buying any.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!