It's confirmed Walthers' next passenger train is the 1948 edition of the 20th Century Limited. 9passenger cars, E7 locomotives. It's gonna cost a lot more per car than previous trains they've put out.
http://www.walthers.com/exec/newproducts/cr/200808/Passenger
The locomotives were listed at the bottom of the page....
PLEASE NOTE: As these cars are the correct prototype length and feature full underbody detail to match the prototypes, a minimum 24" radius is recommended for operation. And Like the New York Central, you'll want the best motive power available to pull your 1948 Century - the all-new PROTO 2000(R) EMD Phase II E7 Diesels: Sound & DCC A-B Set 920-40993 #4028 & #4198 920-40995 #4025 & #4109 A Unit Only 920-40994 #4028 920-40996 #4029 Standard DC A-B Set 920-47993 #4026 & #4110 920-47995 #4027 & #4111 A Unit Only 920-47994 #4030 920-47996 #4031
Here's a link to the cars:
Don Z.
Research; it's not just for geeks.
It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse.
Well these are definitely one the to buy list for me. I'll be getting the entire trains, passenger buff as I am!
Magnus
Texas Zepher wrote:I hope the locomotives will be geared to run faster than 64 smph. The F7s they did for the Empire Builder are dog slow.
Good point. Though it's likely most of us would not do it on layouts, the "Century" sections under E7 power, regularly clocked 100 mph speeds on certain long stretches.
"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"
AntonioFP45 wrote: Texas Zepher wrote:I hope the locomotives will be geared to run faster than 64 smph.Though it's likely most of us would not do it on layouts, the "Century" sections under E7 power, regularly clocked 100 mph speeds on certain long stretches.
Texas Zepher wrote:I hope the locomotives will be geared to run faster than 64 smph.
Texas Zepher wrote:So where are the NYC fans posting what the proper consist of the train should be? I would guess that we will need at least two of each of those sleepers, but even then that is only 12 cars. Sounds way too short to me.
14 - 18 cars would be more typical. They did run sections as short as 10 cars at times though. I'm not to concerned though, I model B&A, the "New England States" is the train I'm a little more concerned with. All Budd stainless consist pulled be an F3 A-B-A set. Cool train.
$64...er...that's like double the Budd cars that they first came out with
But it is a must-have series, especially the Observation cars, nice.
Mine doesn't move.......it's at the station!!!
I did a search for: consist "20th century limited"
On the first page I found a site with 20 pages of consists--I had to "drill down" a bit, but if I can find it, you can. Sadly, there are no car name/numbers; but it's a start.
Ed
AntonioFP45 wrote: Texas Zepher wrote:I hope the locomotives will be geared to run faster than 64 smph. The F7s they did for the Empire Builder are dog slow. Good point. Though it's likely most of us would not do it on layouts, the "Century" sections under E7 power, regularly clocked 100 mph speeds on certain long stretches.
and just how fast do you want to go around those 24" radius curves?
Dave
Just be glad you don't have to press "2" for English.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQ_ALEdDUB8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hqFS1GZL4s
http://s73.photobucket.com/user/steemtrayn/media/MovingcoalontheDCM.mp4.html?sort=3&o=27
MisterBeasley wrote:Don't hold your breath. They're almost a year away.
OK ... exhaling now....I'll be waiting several years till the price drops. holy smokes
Matt
As far as the consist goes here's the original proposed 1948:
1 Baggage/Mail
5 10-6 Sleepers River Series (proposed) 5 4-4-2, Actual...Imperial and Bridge Series
1 Shore car (lounge..)
1 Twin-unit Dining car set*
5 12-double bedroom cars Port Series
1 Creek observation car
*No mention of these cars in the Walther's consist. Considering the cost the train would be distinctly un-20th Century Limited.
Edit: I take that back..they do mention the 10-6 and 4-4-2 sleepers. Just not directly on the list the link points to. The twin-unit diner is a must though IMO.
The Walther's page also includes the 22-roomette sleepers. These were not used on the original train and when they were employed they were so unsuccessful they were pulled from the train right away.
Cool. This is a logical choice for a next plastic prototypical passenger train. If I were collecting, I would get it. But I don't have unlimited wealth and just purchased a 46-inch hi def TV!
My interests are strictly western even though I live in NYC territory. I hope to remedy that and get out of this cold freeze part of the country soon. Gratz to NYC fans!
Rio Grande. The Action Road - Focus 1977-1983
Are you talking about the Proto 2000 F7's that have been out since last year? Those are gorgeous! I just got my first AB set of Rio Grande last month and they are on par with Genesis but with extra prototypical details. Since mine are mountain loco's they won't be running fast anyway.
riogrande5761 wrote: Texas Zepher wrote:I hope the locomotives will be geared to run faster than 64 smph. The F7s they did for the Empire Builder are dog slow. Are you talking about the Proto 2000 F7's that have been out since last year?
Vincent
Wants: 1. high-quality, sound equipped, SD40-2s, C636s, C30-7s, and F-units in BN. As for ones that don't cost an arm and a leg, that's out of the question....
2. An end to the limited-production and other crap that makes models harder to get and more expensive.
Hudson wrote: 1 Baggage/Mail5 10-6 Sleepers River Series (proposed) 5 4-4-2, Actual...Imperial and Bridge Series1 Shore car (lounge..)1 Twin-unit Dining car set*5 12-double bedroom cars Port Series1 Creek observation car*No mention of these cars in the Walther's consist. Considering the cost the train would be distinctly un-20th Century Limited. Edit: I take that back..they do mention the 10-6 and 4-4-2 sleepers. Just not directly on the list the link points to. The twin-unit diner is a must though IMO.
I'm a Northwestern modeler, so I'm not too familiar with NYC; but doesn't Walthers 932-9316 and 932-9318 add up to a twin-unit diner?
Packer wrote:Can't you adjust the CVs to get them to run faster?
It is annoying that additional money and work would be required, but it seems that gear sets from NWSL might be helpful in increasing top end speed.
Might not be a bad idea for customers to send suggestions to the manufacturer suggesting that serious consideration be given to the installation of higher gear ratios in HO passenger diesels.
Though prototypical for E units 100mph on an HO layout appears toylike, whipping around 24 or even 36 radius curves. Personally I would be satisfied with an approximate 85mph top speed for my passenger units.