Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Triplex Video

1245 views
15 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Texas
  • 2,934 posts
Triplex Video
Posted by C&O Fan on Monday, May 26, 2008 2:33 PM

TerryinTexas

See my Web Site Here

http://conewriversubdivision.yolasite.com/

 

 

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Carmichael, CA
  • 8,055 posts
Posted by twhite on Monday, May 26, 2008 3:19 PM

Terry--

I'm drooling--I'm DROOLING.  There's no way on this earth that I could explain away one on my Yuba River Sub, but the more I see of it, the more I think I'll come up with SOME kind of an excuse, LOL! 

That's a HUNKER of a locomotive.

Tom Tongue [:P]

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Amish country Tenn.
  • 10,027 posts
Posted by loathar on Monday, May 26, 2008 3:20 PM
SSSSSSmokin!
  • Member since
    August 2002
  • From: Womelsdorf
  • 756 posts
Posted by HEdward on Monday, May 26, 2008 6:12 PM
There's a tread from a week ago over on the Toy Trains section that mentioned Triplexes as well.  Monster concepts in the days before MUs and universal dieselization.  Gotta love the hobby where the more rare and obscure the loco, the more people want one for their layout.
Proud to be DD-2itized! 1:1 scale is too unrealistic. Twins are twice as nice!
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Monday, May 26, 2008 6:39 PM

No smoke from the tender exhaust?  Or did the engineer have the capability to cut out the rear engine when running light?

Now, how do I achieve that effect, three eight-coupled steam engines operating together?  I could buy a (totally inappropriate for my operating scheme) Triplex.  Or, I could do what my prototype did and triple-head identical 2-8-2s.

I already own the 2-8-2s.

Chuck (modeling Central Japan in September, 1964 - with triple-headed steam when necessary)

  • Member since
    January 2008
  • From: Shalimar. Florida
  • 2,622 posts
Posted by Packer on Monday, May 26, 2008 7:34 PM
I don't need to see the video, A guy at the local club has one. I'm not even a big steam fan, and yet I even want one.

Vincent

Wants: 1. high-quality, sound equipped, SD40-2s, C636s, C30-7s, and F-units in BN. As for ones that don't cost an arm and a leg, that's out of the question....

2. An end to the limited-production and other crap that makes models harder to get and more expensive.

  • Member since
    November 2015
  • 668 posts
Posted by Tjsingle on Monday, May 26, 2008 7:38 PM
Oh man, I would love to own a Erie one, my LHS has one and well seeing it in person is amazing
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Carmichael, CA
  • 8,055 posts
Posted by twhite on Monday, May 26, 2008 7:55 PM

Well, first of all, I'd have to special order it--one of my LHS's out here has been burned a little too often by MTH (No, I DIDN'T inquire why) and the other deals mostly in railroads West of the Mississippi (well, DUH, we ARE in California, LOL!) and if I'm going to order something like that, I'd rather deal locally.  So, I'm going to have to think about that.   But you know, funny thing--in the Rio Grande's re-numbering of their loco series in the 1920's, they DID leave the 3000 series open--that's how I was able to sneak in my 'never was' 3900 Yellowstones.  Hm.  A 3000-3100 or 3200 series Triplex?  Okay, just ONE?  I mean, Rio Grande wasn't afraid to experiment a little--so why not a Triplex to help haul coal over Soldier Summit? 

Oboy, I'm fantasizing.  But that is sure one HUNKER of a loco!

Even if I AM strictly DC. 

Tom Blush [:I] 

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Monday, May 26, 2008 8:32 PM

It looks as if MTH has done an excellent job of this engine.  It would be great to have one just to be the envy of visitors. Big Smile [:D]  However, it is not to be for me, just as the Big Boy is not to be.  I am at the point where I am concentrating more, or spiraling inwards toward, one or two railroads.  No point is any diversions as I see it.

Also, the smoke....nope, just doesn't work for me.  Wrong colour, too wispy as it wafts around the engine unrealistically.  The timing is just excellent...hard to beat what MTH has done with it, but the smoke itself can't get past my hokey filter.  (Sorry if my words get anyone's dander up...not intending to goad or pick an argument, just saying how I feel about it...the engine doesn't matter, nor the manufacturer.)

-Crandell

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Martinez, CA
  • 5,440 posts
Posted by markpierce on Monday, May 26, 2008 10:56 PM

I like my 2-8-2+2-8-0 duplex (a Mikado with a Consolidation under the tender).  It has sixteen powered drivers, the same as the subject model where the tender's drivers are just along for the ride.

Mark

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Dallas, GA
  • 2,643 posts
Posted by TrainFreak409 on Tuesday, May 27, 2008 12:19 PM

I'm waiting for one in N scale just like that! Come on MTH, don't disappoint me! Tongue [:P]

MTH O gauge models have always impressed me, and I've always been impressed with the selection of less-common prototypes they have offered (turbines, large electrics, PRR duplexii, and the Coors Light Silver Bullet to name a few), and the Triplex seems to be a winner everytime! And one of my favorites...

Scott - Dispatcher, Norfolk Southern

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Texas
  • 2,934 posts
Posted by C&O Fan on Wednesday, May 28, 2008 4:22 PM
 twhite wrote:

Well, first of all, I'd have to special order it--Tom Blush [:I] 

Naw just hop on over to Ebay

http://cgi.ebay.com/MTH-NEW-TRIPLEX-BLACK-HO-NEW-NO-RES-CAB-5016-P3-SOUND_W0QQitemZ300227770782QQihZ020QQcategoryZ484QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

 

TerryinTexas

See my Web Site Here

http://conewriversubdivision.yolasite.com/

 

 

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • From: Indiana
  • 3,549 posts
Posted by Flashwave on Wednesday, May 28, 2008 4:33 PM
I have one complaint with the video. Why do you have to write over engine sounds with  music? (tease)

-Morgan

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Finger Lakes
  • 10,198 posts
Posted by howmus on Wednesday, May 28, 2008 4:42 PM

Oh come on......  Hokey looking smoke on a very toy-like layout.  Beautiful looking loco but not exactly something that is going to look or smell good on an HO layout unless you can turn off  the smoke. As far as sound, it sounds the same as all other HO steam locos...about 2 octaves off.  I am not impressed.  And to use all the whistles and bells, you have to buy into Mikes proprietory non-DCC system.

I still think MTH should stick to "O" scale...... Something he does extremely well.

Ray Seneca Lake, Ontario, and Western R.R. (S.L.O.&W.) in HO

We'll get there sooner or later! 

  • Member since
    April 2008
  • From: morganton north carolina
  • 515 posts
Posted by j610 on Thursday, May 29, 2008 7:50 PM
i sure hope their product is better quality than their video        RON
J610
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: NJ
  • 414 posts
Posted by jackn2mpu on Friday, May 30, 2008 4:20 PM

 j610 wrote:
i sure hope their product is better quality than their video        RON

Agreed. You never get a good side shot of the loco running; always from the rear, going away, behind scenery, you know. 

de N2MPU Jack

Proud NRA Life Member and supporter of the 2nd. Amendment

God, guns, and rock and roll!

Modeling the NYC/NYNH&H in HO and CPRail/D&H in N

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!