Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

wireless layout

1618 views
5 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
wireless layout
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, October 30, 2007 5:16 PM
Looking to build a wireless layout.  Any recommendations.  New to all of this.  Currently have a small Backman layout.  Thanks.
  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: Christiana, TN
  • 2,134 posts
Posted by CSX Robert on Tuesday, October 30, 2007 6:20 PM
First question, are you talking DC or DCC?
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: New Brighton, MN
  • 4,393 posts
Posted by ARTHILL on Tuesday, October 30, 2007 7:00 PM

Welcome to the forum. That is a more complicated question than you may think because there are so many answers and there are new things on the market.

I have Digitrax Super Chief with radio and I love it. It is not the least expensive, but it works pretty well.

If you think you have it right, your standards are too low. my photos http://s12.photobucket.com/albums/a235/ARTHILL/ Art
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Tuesday, October 30, 2007 7:07 PM
 desototracks wrote:
Looking to build a wireless layout.  Any recommendations.  New to all of this.  Currently have a small Backman layout.
What scale are you talking about here?  In G-gauge, putting a battery into the locomotive shouldn't be to hard.  There are several off-the-shelf wireless control systems.  For HO or N this is going to be much more difficult.
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Tuesday, October 30, 2007 7:14 PM

I actually had a wireless layout early in my modeling career - totally scratchbuilt, 5DC, 1:196 scale.  (Translation - built with bits of wood and cardstock, moved by the five-digit non-electric propulsion system.)Whistling [:-^]

At the opposite extreme, the SVLS 'layout' in Rancho Cordova was also wireless.  It was ride-on live steam.Approve [^]

Several decades ago a modeler whose name escapes me built a radio controlled A-B set of covered wagons in HO, powered by on-board batteries.  It was demonstrated to Linn Westcott on a restaurant tablecloth (with not a rail in sight.)Shock [:O]

Seriously, all of the powered/controlled systems currently in use, including those which use radio-link or infra-red remote hand units, have under-layout (or on top of the layout) wiring to get power (and DCC signals) to the locomotives.  So, that form of 'wireless' layout - isn't.Sigh [sigh]

Chuck (modeling Central Japan in September, 1964)

 

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Utica, OH
  • 4,000 posts
Posted by jecorbett on Tuesday, October 30, 2007 10:13 PM
It would probably me more accurate to say a less-wire layout. DCC with wireless remote control is the way to achieve that. Because DCC is more sensitive to power interuptions, you will still need main bus wires with feeders to the various sections of track. It depends on whom you listen to as to how many feeders you will need. Some will say to every section of track so that power doesn't need to be carried through rail joiners. I wire every other joint so each section of track is getting power from one end or the other. Unfortunately, onboard power supplies are not yet practical. It can be done, but the batteries will run down very quickly. For now we will still need to wire out layouts.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!