Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Worthwhile three minutes-Big Boy fans.

2361 views
23 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Worthwhile three minutes-Big Boy fans.
Posted by selector on Sunday, September 9, 2007 3:13 PM

I hope this is not against the rules, but I found this short clip courtesy of the host site and Pentrex films.  Not too shabby, even for those who feel they are overexposed to Big Boys.  Cool [8D]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8f9VFlNyDQ&mode=related&search=

 

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Amish country Tenn.
  • 10,027 posts
Posted by loathar on Sunday, September 9, 2007 3:22 PM
Neat! But what the heck was all that smoke coming off that flat cars trucks towards the beginning?Wow!! [wow]
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Seattle WA
  • 1,233 posts
Posted by Hoople on Sunday, September 9, 2007 4:01 PM
Saw it already. Put it in my favorites. I think it's a great little bunch of clips.
Mark.
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • 520 posts
Posted by Loco on Sunday, September 9, 2007 4:45 PM
Cool, I've got three DVD's of the BB's
LAte Loco
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, September 9, 2007 5:14 PM
Not too bad! Good find.
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: northern nj
  • 2,477 posts
Posted by lvanhen on Sunday, September 9, 2007 5:28 PM
1. Copied it.  2.  Got 4 BB Vhs's.  3.  Gonna' have a new one!!  4.  Thanks for the link!!Big Smile [:D]
Lou V H Photo by John
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: New Joizey
  • 1,983 posts
Posted by SteamFreak on Sunday, September 9, 2007 5:32 PM

 loathar wrote:
Neat! But what the heck was all that smoke coming off that flat cars trucks towards the beginning?Wow!! [wow]

I'm guessing it's from overheated brakeshoes. 

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • 520 posts
Posted by Loco on Sunday, September 9, 2007 9:10 PM
Michael, e-mail me: ahmenra@hotmail.com
LAte Loco
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: United Kingdom
  • 198 posts
Posted by whywaites on Monday, September 10, 2007 10:18 AM

Great, not a topic I would have normally looked at but after seeing the clip I am a changed man. It states in the video that the Big Boy was the largest articulated steam loco in the worls but what about the Beyer Garrats built for railways in South Africa I thought they were the biggest?

 

Shaun

"Flying is easy. all you have to do is throw yourself at the ground and miss" Douglas Adams
  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Sweden
  • 1,808 posts
Posted by Lillen on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 3:53 AM

Well Crandell, now you gone and done it. My wife is going to kill me. This led me not only to to buy this film setting me back 50$ but also to pre-order four of the new Blueline Big boys. I hope your happy now you housebreaker!  Big Smile [:D]

 

Seriously, that seems great. Most of the railroad films I've seen so far have been boring and poorly narrated, that seems great. And the quality seems nice to. Also, it have an appropriate length, it seems to me that a lot of the movies out there are to short for what you pay to get it. Oh, and it's all regions which is great for us Europeans that have a different region then you guys.

 

Magnus

Unless otherwise mentioned it's HO and about the 50's. Magnus
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 1:06 PM

Magnus, what can I say? Big Smile [:D]  It was a purely innocent passing on of information...something we modelers do all the time as a courtesy to one another. Mischief [:-,]

Besides, Big Boys in HO don't need trips to the vet, no needles, no food, are not under foot in the kitchen, don't lie in wait under your dining table, and they always come when you command them.  If you promise to keep them in the train room, you won't have any pet hairs to vacuum regularly, nothing to pick up on the lawn, nothing to take for a walk.

And, unlike your Big Boys, you will always come to bed when you are called...right?  IOW, you'll be the only big boy there. Approve [^]

  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Sweden
  • 1,808 posts
Posted by Lillen on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 3:14 PM

Good points Crandell, I'll use all of them to convince the wife. I bought my wife a really nice necklace for her birthday tomorrow and it will be the first thing she sees when she gets down. Such things always help when it comes to explaining just how important trains are.

 

Magnus

Unless otherwise mentioned it's HO and about the 50's. Magnus
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 4:09 PM
 Lillen wrote:

Good points Crandell, I'll use all of them to convince the wife. I bought my wife a really nice necklace for her birthday tomorrow and it will be the first thing she sees when she gets down. Such things always help when it comes to explaining just how important trains are.

 

Magnus

(shakes his head) Magnus, Magnus, Magnus......Whistling [:-^]  You must be a fairly recent addition to the roster of those permanently attached to a woman.  Had you been a more experienced husband, your words would have read, "explaining just how important She is."  To close the logic for you, the necklace is for her, not the trains.  At least, that is what the intrepid husband must make her understand. Big Smile [:D]

  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Sweden
  • 1,808 posts
Posted by Lillen on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 4:12 PM

Thanks Crandell, that saved me a week in the doghouse(that I'm yet to build). We have been together for 9 years now and I guess you are never to old to learn new tricks.

 

Magnus

Unless otherwise mentioned it's HO and about the 50's. Magnus
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Enid, Oklahoma
  • 52 posts
Posted by SF Bill on Thursday, September 13, 2007 3:05 PM

Awesome.  Reminds me of the time I and a couple of RR buddies camped out overnight in our sleeping bags  next to the ROW on Sherman Hill in 1954.

Bill

  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Sweden
  • 1,808 posts
Posted by Lillen on Thursday, September 13, 2007 3:27 PM

As we are discussing Big boys I have a question, what does Tender 25-C-400 under the description of the PCM Big boys?

 

Magnus

Unless otherwise mentioned it's HO and about the 50's. Magnus
  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Sweden
  • 1,808 posts
Posted by Lillen on Tuesday, September 18, 2007 6:18 AM

I got the video today, fast delivery I  must say. I'll be watching it to night while eating some pop corn.

 

Magnus

Unless otherwise mentioned it's HO and about the 50's. Magnus
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 191 posts
Posted by bb4884 on Tuesday, September 18, 2007 7:06 AM
 Lillen wrote:

As we are discussing Big boys I have a question, what does Tender 25-C-400 under the description of the PCM Big boys?

 

Magnus

25 stands for 25,000 gal. of water

C stands for --Coal?--

400 Tons of coal?

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Tuesday, September 18, 2007 11:19 AM
Or is it 400 cu feet?  I don't think a tender holds 400 tons of coal....does it?
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Louis
  • 516 posts
Posted by mls1621 on Tuesday, September 18, 2007 11:58 AM

 selector wrote:
Or is it 400 cu feet?  I don't think a tender holds 400 tons of coal....does it?

I can't confirm the volume of the coal bunker in the tender, but the spec sheets I have for the Big Boy state coal capacity at 56,000 lbs (28 tons) for both the 1941 and 1944 tenders.  The difference was the water capacity, 24,000 gals for the '41 version and 25,000 gals for the '44 version.

The total, loaded, weight for the 1941 tender was 427,500 lbs and the 1944 tender was 436,500 lbs.

The total package, locomotive and tender weighed 1,189,500 lbs in 1941 and 1,208,750 lbs in 1944.

 

Mike St Louis N Scale UP in the 60's Turbines are so cool
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 18, 2007 7:47 PM

24,000 gallons of wadder?

That's equal to three 18 wheel tankers (8000 gal) of water aint it?

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: New Joizey
  • 1,983 posts
Posted by SteamFreak on Monday, September 24, 2007 4:05 PM
 Safety Valve wrote:

24,000 gallons of wadder?

That's equal to three 18 wheel tankers (8000 gal) of water aint it?

Deer Park, that's a lot of water!! Shock [:O]

Too bad there wasn't a bottled water craze back then. UP could have defrayed their fuel costs with corporate sponsorships from Deer Park, Poland Spring, Aquafina, etc. with their billboards on the tenders. "If our water can fuel this locomotive, imagine what it can do for you!" Big Smile [:D]

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!