Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

ALL NEW MRC 16bit sound decoders

19521 views
36 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: East central Missouri
  • 1,065 posts
ALL NEW MRC 16bit sound decoders
Posted by Santa Fe all the way! on Saturday, March 24, 2012 7:23 PM
Well I guess MRC finally got tired of losing all the DCC sound business to Soundtraxx, so they've scrapped there old lineup, and are comming out with an entirely new line of 16 bit sound decoders. Supposedly they recorded all new sounds. They come with a speaker,8 or 9 pin plug and retail for Half what a Tsunami does. Sounds are supposed to be great, could be very exciting, we'll see.
Come on CMW, make a '41-'46 Chevy school bus!
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Saturday, March 24, 2012 7:33 PM

 Wonder if they will keep track of what sounds the record this time, so rather than syaing they have 32 horn sounds, they can tell you WHAT horn sounds they have.

               --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
  • 13,757 posts
Posted by cacole on Saturday, March 24, 2012 10:45 PM

Unless they are getting them from a different factory in China that will actually do some quality control testing they will still be extremely unreliable.

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: East central Missouri
  • 1,065 posts
Posted by Santa Fe all the way! on Sunday, March 25, 2012 1:32 AM
Wow, what a lackluster response.Can someone who has actually heard one of these post a response? I know MRC is a 4 letter word on this forum,but it sounds like they may have 'woke up and smelt the coffee'. I have 4 Athearn Genesis F units + a Proto 1000 RS-2 that could use these, if there as good as a tsunami for $41.xx ea. instead of $80 + a speaker. I wish I could find a sound sample or a review online somewhere.
Come on CMW, make a '41-'46 Chevy school bus!
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 400 posts
Posted by rrboomer on Sunday, March 25, 2012 2:19 AM

I find it rather curious they don't have any sound bites to listen to on their web site. 

Dick Haave

 

 

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: East central Missouri
  • 1,065 posts
Posted by Santa Fe all the way! on Sunday, March 25, 2012 2:29 AM
Yah, I thought that too. I just found and read a review of their 16 bit Genset decoder, not good, seems they may not have 'woke up' Hoping their 16 bit 567 decoder is better.
Come on CMW, make a '41-'46 Chevy school bus!
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Pittsburgh, PA
  • 1,796 posts
Posted by JoeinPA on Sunday, March 25, 2012 7:58 AM

But I'll bet their advertising will claim that it's a revolution in sound technology and light years ahead of everyone else.Smile, Wink & Grin

Joe 

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Sunday, March 25, 2012 10:55 AM

 They don't even have manuals to view on their web site for the new ones. I want to see if they actually list what the horn and bell sounds are, not just how they have such an awesome amount of memory that they can story dozens of horns and bells and let you select them with a CV. Everyone else that does this lists that settign the horn CV to 1 is a P3, 2 is a P5, 3 is a E2, etc so you know which one you need to select.

 They ARE touting them as "the world's most advanced decoders" and "engineered in New Jersey" LOL

                  --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    January 2008
  • From: Big Blackfoot River
  • 2,788 posts
Posted by Geared Steam on Sunday, March 25, 2012 11:08 AM

Your gamble, go ahead and save $40 and take the risk, but please report back your experiences as a benefit to the community.

I prefer to support another company whom has first class engineering, service and support. As far as I'm concerned MRC has done damage to the hobby with their Tyco quality decoders, it will take a decade of outstanding MRC products to possibly erase the failures of the past. If they do, good for them, but until that happens...

"The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination."-Albert Einstein

http://gearedsteam.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Eastern Shore Virginia
  • 3,290 posts
Posted by gandydancer19 on Tuesday, March 27, 2012 2:53 PM

I'm in a 'wait and see' mode too.  I have already been bit once.

Elmer.

The above is my opinion, from an active and experienced Model Railroader in N scale and HO since 1961.

(Modeling Freelance, Eastern US, HO scale, in 1962, with NCE DCC for locomotive control and a stand alone LocoNet for block detection and signals.) http://waynes-trains.com/ at home, and N scale at the Club.

  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Ontario Canada
  • 3,574 posts
Posted by Mark R. on Tuesday, March 27, 2012 3:47 PM

Wouldn't this fall into that "you get what you pay for" category ?

Mark.

 

¡ uʍop ǝpısdn sı ǝɹnʇɐuƃıs ʎɯ 'dlǝɥ

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Tuesday, March 27, 2012 4:04 PM

FWIW I've got one of the new $40+ Digitrax sound decoders on order, be interesting to see how that works. One nice thing is you can download new sounds onto it.

Stix
  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Tuesday, March 27, 2012 8:12 PM

Let's put it this way. I purchased ONE MRC sound decoder. Never ever again.

Fool me once, shame on them. Fool me twice, shame on me.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Jacksonville, FL
  • 913 posts
Posted by gatrhumpy on Wednesday, March 28, 2012 5:53 AM

I whole-heartedly disagree.

I have several MRC sound decoders, including the 1955, and they sound fantastic. They have been run two to three times a day for the past 16 months or so. They are extremely reliable. I love them and will continue to buy them when I acquire new engines.

Want a sucky decoder? Buy Digitrax.

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Metro East St. Louis
  • 5,743 posts
Posted by simon1966 on Wednesday, March 28, 2012 7:12 AM

I'll need some serious convincing to get an MRC decoder again.  I have one.  It actually still works, but it has to be reset periodically, it just goes haywire and quits working, thank God for Decoder Pro.  The worst part is the sound, it is way too loud and I can't adjust it any lower, it is on its lowest setting now.  It will teach me to go cheap on one of my son's locos!

Like it or not, MRC has a serious PR issue on its hands.  What amounts to blatant over inflation of their performance in their advertising is hardly the way to woo sceptics.  For every person that is happy with their product there appears to be a dozen who have had a bad experience.  Frankly, if it were not for their distribution channels, putting their product at bargain prices in every general purpose hobby shop, I can't imagine they would still be in business with their track record in DCC.

Simon Modelling CB&Q and Wabash See my slowly evolving layout on my picturetrail site http://www.picturetrail.com/simontrains and our videos at http://www.youtube.com/user/MrCrispybake?feature=mhum

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Wednesday, March 28, 2012 7:13 AM

 Have you heard any others? The Alco sounds in the one MRC decoder I have are hideous compared to my MTH. And I guess you must just pick whatever horn sounds good to you, without regard for what horn is actually on the given loco, since MRC can't tell you which is a Nathan 5 chime, a Leslie 5 chime, etc. Seems funny to me if they really went out and recorded the sounds from actual locomotives, they could have written down each horn the captured so they'd know which one was which.

 My Soundbug makes better Alco sounds, although no one has a 244 project so I can't use it in an RS3.

                 --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    May 2002
  • From: Massachusetts
  • 2,899 posts
Posted by Paul3 on Wednesday, March 28, 2012 7:52 PM

Ah, yes.  MRC, the company that will lie to your face.  They did to me.  I asked them at the Springfield Show about their new (at the time) drop in sound decoder for Atlas S-unit locos.  I told them I heard rumors that they had recorded the wrong engine for their sound effects.  The MRC rep. told me that oh, no, those rumors were wrong and that all their sound decoders are recorded live from the real engines that match the decoders.

BZZZZZZT!  Wrong!  The Alco S-unit board they made distinctly sounds like an Alco 244 V-12 RS-3 and not a straight-6 539 Alco.  Most people can tell the difference between a 6 cylinder and a 12 cylinder engine...but MRC can't.

The funny part to me is that months later, the as ever ridiculous back of MR advertizing from MRC actually described the S-unit sound decoder as having a 244 prime mover in it.  D'oh!  Oops

Also, I've said it before, and I'll say it again...  MRC sound decoders have a 50% failure rate at our DCC club.  At least half have failed to either program or run (or both!).

Paul A. Cutler III

  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Ontario Canada
  • 3,574 posts
Posted by Mark R. on Saturday, March 31, 2012 1:20 PM

rrinker

 My Soundbug makes better Alco sounds, although no one has a 244 project so I can't use it in an RS3.

                 --Randy

Loksound has a 244 project in their Select Direct line of decoders. Not really sure why people always tend to forget about Loksound decoders when the topic of sound comes up. They've recently released an Atlas style board as a drop-in replacement, their motor control is second to none and they are adding new sound files on a regular basis.

I went on the recording session with ESU when they did the C630M, and I can tell you, these are not "pitch bent" sounds. Each notch was recorded under load including the proper transitions between each notch.

These decoders also have manual notching and a properly functioning dynamic brake - not just a button that turns on a fan sound ! Anyone interested in proto-typical sound really needs to check these out.

Mark.

¡ uʍop ǝpısdn sı ǝɹnʇɐuƃıs ʎɯ 'dlǝɥ

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Saturday, March 31, 2012 2:00 PM

 Definitely worth considering, I probably wasn;t goign to use the SOundbug, I mentioned that as a comparison for MRC. I have a pair of PCM steam locos with Loksound in them, and indeed, they run and sound great - do need to find someone with a Loksound programmer to replace the sounds with some real Reading T-1 sounds though, but it's close enough. I haven't tried any of their diesel sounds, I was probbaly goign to put a QSI Titan in it. I need to check current - I'd liek to put sound in my Brass RS3 as well as either the Athearn or one of the multitude of Atlas ones I have yet to finish - all undec, need added details and paint/decals.

 All i want to know about the Loksound diesel sound decoders is - do they load up, if I set momentum to something non-zero and crank open the throttle, will is load up and then scale back the sound as the loco reaches speed like the QSI. This is the biggest place where Soundtraxx missed the boat and it drives me bonkers. Enough even to replace the one Tsunami and maybe even the old DSD I have in a dummy (the DSD-LC they sold as 'generic' but it's pretty much a 567)

Edit: Huge bummer, the Select does not have a Nathan M3 horn, nore does the Loksound 4.0 with the Alco 244. Very popular horn on the RS3, at least the M-3RT1 variation with the center bell tilted to face back over the cab. Now, depending on which P3 they recorded, it could be used instead - the ORIGINAL P3 sounded the same chord as the M3, but newer P3's are different. Yes, I suppose I am being picky, but I am going to the effort of installing the proper bracket and horn from Cal-Scale on each RS3, so I want the right sound, too. Of course they call it a "D&H horn" and some horn sites say they M-3RT1 was made for the D&H - umm, those RS3's were used Reading ones.

                  --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Ontario Canada
  • 3,574 posts
Posted by Mark R. on Saturday, March 31, 2012 2:23 PM

Right out of the box, the Loksound decoders work really well. They do load up before they move just as they should. The manual notching is a really cool feature in that once the speed step is non-zero, you can notch the sound up without increasing the physical speed greatly replicating getting a heavy train under way.

With this you can also replicate a load test by running up through all eight notches while sitting still !

The dynamic brake feature is really slick as well - unlike any other decoder out there. When you turn on dynamic brakes, the engine sound immediately notches down to idle and the dynamic fans start. Your physical speed does not change. During this process, you can throttle the speed down (when running downhill). When you turn dynamics off, the fan winds down and the engine notches back up to match where your throttle is now set - just like the real thing !

If you like playing with more sounds and features besides just the bell and horn, these Loksound decoders are packed full of correct proto-type features and sounds.

Mark.

 

¡ uʍop ǝpısdn sı ǝɹnʇɐuƃıs ʎɯ 'dlǝɥ

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: East central Missouri
  • 1,065 posts
Posted by Santa Fe all the way! on Saturday, March 31, 2012 7:23 PM
I agree that MRC has fouled things up for themselves, dropped the ball in many ways, yet Im still curious about if these new 16bit decoders use real sounds or the crappy old MRC sounds , like the ones in my older Athearn Genesis F 3's and F9's. My personal favorite sound decoders are Tsunamis although I have a GP7 with QSI that sounds pretty good to me. Just my experience, but I did install a MRC sound bug in my RS2 and it sounds and operates good. I must have been lucky. :-)
Come on CMW, make a '41-'46 Chevy school bus!
  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Saturday, March 31, 2012 9:09 PM

Mark, thanks for the info on the new loksound decoders. I may just have to get a couple of these for my next DCC installs.

Question on the loksound decoders. They need to be programmed for the specific diesel sounds?

They are different than QSI/Tsumanis where they already have the sounds per model.

Please explain what "ready for programming" means?

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Saturday, March 31, 2012 9:31 PM

 They are like QSI, where any decoder can have any sounds. Most dealers preload a sound set of your choice. You can replace them if you have the specific programmer. Of the ones I consider the top 3, Soundtraxx, QSI, and Loksound, only the Tsunami has fixed sounds per SKU. Back to the past. The QSI and ESU models are better for dealers - just stock a set of decoders in each form factor, sound set does not matter, you can install whatever the customer orders. If a dealer has a TSU1000AT with FDL16 but is out of the TSU1000AT with EMD 645, he can't make the sale.

                      --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Zagreb / Croatia /Europe
  • 259 posts
Posted by Spalato68 on Tuesday, April 3, 2012 12:39 AM

Mark,

do you refer on Loksound Select or Loksound V4.0 regarding manual notching feature?

Thanks,

 

Hrvoje

  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Ontario Canada
  • 3,574 posts
Posted by Mark R. on Tuesday, April 3, 2012 12:52 AM

Spalato68

Mark,

do you refer on Loksound Select or Loksound V4.0 regarding manual notching feature?

Thanks,

 

Hrvoje

Loksound quit using true manual notching with the 3.5 decoders. Subsequent Select and 4.0 decoders went to a "manual notching" which was nothing more than a pre-set (user selectable) number of notches the prime mover would increase by pressing a single function button. Interesting, but not very proto-typical and the masses voiced their opinion about having true manual notching put back as it was on the 3.5 decoders.

Well, our voices were heard. I just finished Beta testing the new manual notching, and it's great ! One function button increases the engine notch and another button decreases it - totally independant of whatever speed step you are running at. You can even do an eight notch load test without even moving. Great fun to have your engine crawling up a hill in notch 8. 

This new release should be made available to the public to use in all Select and 4.0 decoders within the next week .... you'll love it !

Mark.

¡ uʍop ǝpısdn sı ǝɹnʇɐuƃıs ʎɯ 'dlǝɥ

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
  • 13,757 posts
Posted by cacole on Tuesday, April 3, 2012 10:45 AM

Every time I read a message from someone who is raving about how wonderful an MRC sound decoder is, my first impression is that he or she probably works for MRC, is an MRC dealer, or works for the advertising agency that produces the horribly exaggerated claims about MRC sound decoders.

If MRC would just redirect some of the money on actual research and quality control instead of very expensive color advertising that appears in all of the model railroad publications, they could actually produce a good sound decoder.  As it is, they seem to use the cheapest possible manufacturer they could find in China who does absolutely no quality control testing and uses the cheapest possible components.

None of the hobby publications will tell you how much a full-page color advertisement on the back cover costs unless you are a big manufacturer who hires an advertising agency, but it probably would be in the ballpark of $10K per issue, so MRC seems to be spending close to $25K per month on advertising.  Are they really selling enough sound decoders to justify such an expenditure?  

Over the years, I've had 3 or 4 MRC decoders go up in smoke within 15 minutes, or were totally dead on arrival.  I'll never touch another one no matter how many exaggerated claims they make.

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Zagreb / Croatia /Europe
  • 259 posts
Posted by Spalato68 on Tuesday, April 3, 2012 2:30 PM

Thank you, that is very nice news!

Hrvoje

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 3,312 posts
Posted by locoi1sa on Tuesday, April 3, 2012 4:24 PM

 Beside the older DC power packs MRC has not made a quality product in over a decade. Not one of their decoders has survived our clubs layout.

  I too am impressed with the Loksound version4 and Select decoders. I just wish they would come out with an instruction manual for the version 4 programmer software. The version 2 software was great but the latest version I just can not figure out. A word of warning about the Select decoders. You can not configure individual sounds. It comes as a package with several prime mover, bell, and horn/whistle sounds. If the sound set does not come with a particular horn you want you can not add it or change it. You have to change the whole sound set. The version 4 decoder is more customizable. Loksound motor control is second to none. They have improved their lighting control CVs but finding the right combinations of CVs is hard to figure out. Other than improving the manuals they are great decoders and turning out to be my first choice for new sound decoder installations.

  Check E-bay for programers. I picked up a Lokprogramer for $30. It even came with the USB adapter and power supply. The software and manuals are downloads on the ESU website.

            Pete

 I pray every day I break even, Cause I can really use the money!

 I started with nothing and still have most of it left!

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: East central Missouri
  • 1,065 posts
Posted by Santa Fe all the way! on Wednesday, April 4, 2012 2:47 PM
2 pages, 29 'replies' MRC is the devil, Loc sound/QSI thread hijackers, but still no real first hand observations/ sound sample or link to sound sample for the NEW 16bit decoders. I should have known better.
Come on CMW, make a '41-'46 Chevy school bus!
  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: East central Missouri
  • 1,065 posts
Posted by Santa Fe all the way! on Wednesday, April 4, 2012 4:08 PM
OK, I finally get it, MRC IS Messed up! I just called their contact number for DCC and WOW, these people are really wingnuts. This guy I get sounds irritated/bothered/arrogant /*** that he has to answer a couple of questions from a customer. He told me that my older Ath Genesis F units factory sound was a real recorded 567 and so is the new 16 bit decoder ,so it probably wouldnt be much of an improvement to install the new ones. What? Why in the heck did they come out with a new line if there no improvement!? This guy is their link to their customers...OH BOY. Im officially a member of the MRC dislikers club! (MRCDC) That company is doomed.
Come on CMW, make a '41-'46 Chevy school bus!

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!