Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

1950's Reading Themed Layout Build Thread

11589 views
126 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2013
  • From: Richmond, VA
  • 1,890 posts
Posted by carl425 on Sunday, March 22, 2020 12:05 PM

I too would prefer not to use Masonite for backdrop or fascia. What radius do you think this "underlayment" could achieve?  Down here if you ask for underlayment they'll give you Luan plywood (which I'm sure would be unsatisfactory).  Does the material you're talking about have any other names?

I do have access to some nice 1/8" baltic birch, but I'm afraid it wouldn't be bendy enough.

I have the right to remain silent.  By posting here I have given up that right and accept that anything I say can and will be used as evidence to critique me.

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 1,500 posts
Posted by ROBERT PETRICK on Sunday, March 22, 2020 12:21 PM

Hey Randy (and Sheldon, respectfully)

I try to make clear that my meager contribution to this forum is simply showing/explaining what I have done. I'm fully aware that every situation is different.

Yes, masonite is not underlayment; nor is it drywall nor plywood nor tongue-and-groove pecky cypress. What I am saying is that masonite is a perfectly appropriate and suitable material. As long as its properties and limitations are recognized.

In my case . . . the glued scarf joints appear to be holding. The nails are holding. I will monitor them for the next 15 years or so and post photos every once in a while, and if the appearance/performance falls below my standards I will dutifully report it.

Most of the fascia is about 5 or 6 inches deep, but there are areas (up to about 12 unbroken linear feet in length, and around a curve) where the fascia is 27 inches deep. No open joints or stress or buckling there as well. Yet.

In fairness, I live in the high desert of Wyoming and the humidity is ridiculously low and constant. The range of temperature in the layout room does not exceed 5 degrees per year. That is 5 degrees total variance, or 2.5 degrees from the yearly average. But even so, my philosophy is that the coefficient of expansion for the artificial wood product (masonite hardboard) is similar to the coefficients for the lumber and plywood underlying substrate.

I apologize for the buggy ride. Please carry on.

Robert

EDIT

There are photos of the fascia on my layout build thread, but I'm adding this additional view from another angle:

The fascia in this area was installed about two years ago and it was painted about one year ago. This photo was taken about 15 minutes ago. The radius around the end of this peninsula is 30 inches.

Forgive the clutter; I am currently ballasting the area.

LINK to SNSR Blog


  • Member since
    December 2015
  • From: Shenandoah Valley
  • 9,094 posts
Posted by BigDaddy on Sunday, March 22, 2020 12:25 PM

Earlier Randy and someone else mentioned the Kreg attachment.  They have at least two designs, 1 a straight track on which the saw rides in what people call a sled, the other 2 a lateral extension to the sled that rides on the outside of the material that is being cut.

Both have mixed reviews in that there is too much play in the track-sled interface or the saw isn't held consistently. 

What do you have and why do suppose it doesn't get consistently good reviews..

Henry

COB Potomac & Northern

Shenandoah Valley

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Sunday, March 22, 2020 1:49 PM

 I have the Kreg Rip-Cut, it's the one that slides along the edge of the material.

I haven't tried it yet. Seems to have mostly positve reviews on Lowes. I can see where someone who tries to hurry and push the saw through too fast will get poor results, same thing happens when sawing freehand. My miter saw cuts just fine - but if I try to rush something and maybe not clamp down the piece but hold it by hand, the wuality fo cut goes way down. Like any other tool, use it properly, and you get good results. As soon as you shortcut - you're going to get sub-par results.

 I also have a high quality repalcement blade to use on my circular saw, designed to cut plywood, instead of the dubious quality general purpose blade the saw comes with, so I'm sure that will help make better cuts as well. 

 Doesn't matter which way I cut my 3/4 ply, it comes in 5x5 sheets, not 4x8. Since both surface veneers run the grain the same way, i will cut to minimize chipping out just so the pieces are easier to handle.

 There's also a trick of using a piece of hardboard under the shoe to make a zero-clearance insert for a circular saw, but I'm not sure that will work with the attachment of the Kreg jig.

 And I may have a use for the leftover extruded foam pieces I have - instead of trying to steady these sheets on sawhorses, I can lay them on the ground on top of the foam to cut. 

                                               --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Maryland
  • 12,897 posts
Posted by ATLANTIC CENTRAL on Sunday, March 22, 2020 2:38 PM

Robert,

From what I see you layout looks very nice.

Here in the humid summers of the Mid Atlantic, Masonite does not always fair as well.........for much of anything. I used some masonite based paneling for the interior of a pool house changing room - what a mistake, buckled from humidity and temperature extreems.

Because, most lumber expansion and contraction is a function of moisture content, not temperature.

I have always had my layouts in reasonably well controlled environments, but not as tightly controlled as yours. You are fortunate.

The drilling, nailing, stapling and screwing properties of Masonite are one of the reasons I don't care for the product.

I have known lots of modelers over the last 50 years who have used it for layout fascias, and in this climate, the upholstery washer/screw method remains most reliable long term. 

Layouts in this region are generally in basements, temperatures are easily kept steady, humidity not always.

Personally, I have never been a fan of the free form fascia, so I have never needed to use something flexible like Masonite. But I am considering some curved fascia sections on my new layout. Thin plywood like underlayment will work fine.

Sheldon

    

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Maryland
  • 12,897 posts
Posted by ATLANTIC CENTRAL on Sunday, March 22, 2020 3:43 PM

rrinker

 I have the Kreg Rip-Cut, it's the one that slides along the edge of the material.

I haven't tried it yet. Seems to have mostly positve reviews on Lowes. I can see where someone who tries to hurry and push the saw through too fast will get poor results, same thing happens when sawing freehand. My miter saw cuts just fine - but if I try to rush something and maybe not clamp down the piece but hold it by hand, the wuality fo cut goes way down. Like any other tool, use it properly, and you get good results. As soon as you shortcut - you're going to get sub-par results.

 I also have a high quality repalcement blade to use on my circular saw, designed to cut plywood, instead of the dubious quality general purpose blade the saw comes with, so I'm sure that will help make better cuts as well. 

 Doesn't matter which way I cut my 3/4 ply, it comes in 5x5 sheets, not 4x8. Since both surface veneers run the grain the same way, i will cut to minimize chipping out just so the pieces are easier to handle.

 There's also a trick of using a piece of hardboard under the shoe to make a zero-clearance insert for a circular saw, but I'm not sure that will work with the attachment of the Kreg jig.

 And I may have a use for the leftover extruded foam pieces I have - instead of trying to steady these sheets on sawhorses, I can lay them on the ground on top of the foam to cut. 

                                               --Randy

 

 

Randy,

The Kreg tools look interesting, I have never purchased or used them. They look like a lot of setup work.

I have a table saw able to handle 4x8 material, but more importantly I typically rip plywood with a circular saw, two clamps and an 8' level. If I need furnture precision, I rip it oversized and run it thru the table saw.

The real trick to circular saws is, as you mentioned the blade, and also the saw - you get what you pay for.......

We typically lay plywood on three or four 2x4's for riping.

Sheldon

    

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Sunday, March 22, 2020 4:40 PM

 I don't have a table saw, or room to use one for full sheets - not to mention carrying and supporting full sheets of plywood - 3/4 is heavy. 

There seems to be little setup with this tool. I don't trust built-in markings, but really I need all 3" wide strips so once I have the slide with the saw blade the right distance from the piece that slides along the edge, it's just cut, cut, cut. It's just a lever clamp that attaches the adjustable part to the slider and arm, so there's very little setup for this tool. Kreg seems to have a bunch of other fancier tools to use with table saws.

                        --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Sunday, March 22, 2020 7:50 PM

 Moving right along, along to the back wall of the alcome. And got some of the blocks attached to the verticals. Set a piece of the underlayment in place. I was able to get it to bend even more than it is here, but with nothing to hold the end in place (not ready to actually attach it yet), this is the best I can do with something to wedge it in place on both ends. I think it will work fine.

 

Little by little, it grows. 

 

     --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Bradford, Ontario
  • 15,797 posts
Posted by hon30critter on Sunday, March 22, 2020 8:38 PM

That looks promising Randy.

Dave

I'm just a dude with a bad back having a lot of fun with model trains, and finally building a layout!

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Sunday, March 22, 2020 9:35 PM

 I'm more worried about the other end, where it will have to form a convex curve. I don;t think it will bend tight enough, although some water may help. Or I may bave to notch in a different material to make the curve.

THese little blocks are a pain, I can line them all up nicely thanks to my laser level, but as the screw bites, they want to spin. That's WITH pilot holes drilled. Though  I guess I don;t really need to try and be so precise with the placement, the roadbed will be supported on rises, and so long as the roadbed is level, or on an eevn grade with no dips and humps, it should be fine. They can't be too willy-nilly, or the backdrop pieces won't fit between the decks. But trying to get them all perfectly aligned on a laser straight line may be more effort than is required.

 ANd I will soon be out of 2x4s again. Guess I should buy more than 8 at a time, but it takes long enough to pick through the pile of what is supposed to be the premium quality ones to get 8 at a time. Top Choice? I'm thinking Total and a different C word. 

                                      

                                               --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    August 2013
  • From: Richmond, VA
  • 1,890 posts
Posted by carl425 on Sunday, March 22, 2020 11:36 PM

rrinker
as the screw bites, they want to spin.

The Irwin Quick-Grip clamps placed so the faces of the clamp are on both sides of both the 2x4 on the wall and the block will hold the blocks tight enough so the screws won't spin them.

I have the right to remain silent.  By posting here I have given up that right and accept that anything I say can and will be used as evidence to critique me.

  • Member since
    February 2015
  • From: Ludington, MI
  • 1,862 posts
Posted by Water Level Route on Tuesday, March 24, 2020 7:05 AM

carl425
The Irwin Quick-Grip clamps placed so the faces of the clamp are on both sides of both the 2x4 on the wall and the block will hold the blocks tight enough so the screws won't spin them.

This, or start one just into the second layer, but don't drive it home.  Then run your second one all the way.  The first screw will help prevent the block from rotating.  Drive it the rest of the way once the second screw is in.

Mike

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Tuesday, March 24, 2020 7:35 AM

Before you get too far along, I would put a couple coats of paint on the backdrop material and see if you like the way it looks.  It would be a shame to put in 200 ft of backdrop and then find out you can see the plywood grain in the "sky" and don't like the effect.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Tuesday, March 24, 2020 8:07 AM

 I plan on primering it with good high-hide primer first. Likely the good shellac-based stuff, then sand it. 

                                --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Tuesday, March 24, 2020 8:25 AM

Masonite is less work, just saying.

Any reason you are using 2x4's for the backdrop supports?

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Tuesday, March 24, 2020 2:35 PM

 They're also supporting the whole layout. I really wanted to use dimensional lumber cut from 3/4 plywood, but after testing various options, none of them allowed for a nice sturdy attachment with no wobble. The extra 3/4" thickness doesn't negatively impact my track plan, and the extra depth will make it easier to run wires down behind the backdrop - power supplies for the LED strip lights, accessory power, , etc.

 I was mostly worried about how tightly I could curve this stuff, but the first corner test seems to indicate no problem. Masonite still has to be primed to prevent bleed through, and I still think drywall mud will adhere better to wood than masonite. In fact that's one option I've seen for hiding plywood grain - skim coat the whole thing then sand. That is probably too much work. If the shellac-based primer can hide oak grain, it can hide this light stuff.

                                        --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 160 posts
Posted by bing&kathy on Friday, March 27, 2020 10:15 AM

   Just a word on grid for layout. I used steel studs for my gridwork. Used a crimper to hold together and only screws used were to fasten back to wall. Less than a day to cut and assemble. My entire layout has no legs in front nor braces on back. My longest run is 14'. This is topped by 2" to 4" of pink foam. I used steel because my layout room is subject to various temperature and humidity swings. It has stood up wonderfully and resisted movement.

God's Best & Happy Rails to You!

Bing  (RIPRR The Route of the Buzzards)

The future: Dead Rail Society

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Friday, March 27, 2020 7:46 PM

 Well if that has held up, with just steel stud horizontals, and frames screwed to the wall studs, but no legs and no braces - I'm not sure why people think what I'm doing is going to sag. Once there's layers of scenery on it, it would even take a LOT of water to mage the plywood soggy - if that ever happens, I have more serious issues than the layout sagging.The test piece I build - most every time I walk past it, I hang off the end - so far nothing has moved.

                                           --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Friday, March 27, 2020 7:57 PM

 Update - this afternoon the governor announced shelter in place requirements for my county now as well. So it was off for a last minute run to Lowes to get supplies - even if I wasn't actually working from home during the week, I now have enough wood to completely finish the area where the the yard and town go, and either start on the moveable section in front of the furnace, or the base of the helix (if I can get to the old legs from my previous layout). Even finish the backdrop in that area - I got a wood sealer/primer and plenty of sandpaper for my littler sander. Even some spare tools - like extra drillbits of the size I am using for my pilot holes, in case I break one. Even got a gallon of sky blue color - some Valspar "Carolina Sky" which looked good under lights the same color I plan to use (I took the sample down to the lighting department to make sure). Hard to see here but I clipped the sample to the backdrop:

Looks reasonable to me.

                                        --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Saturday, March 28, 2020 9:31 PM

Positives on underlayment backdrop (so far): It's cheap. It's smooth.

Cons on underlayment backdrop (so far): It's much harder to get small radius curves than hardboard

It may end up being a scarifice, but I actually screwed in place th first piece of backdrop around the inside corner. Luckily the screws I used use a Torx head, so I can load one on the drill and it doesn't fall out while I wrestle the piece of underlayment in place. It bent to a sharp enough radius (I did wet some shop towels and dampen the back side - I don't know if I actually got it damp enough to matter or not though). The force it was trying to push itself back out straight though - I wasn;t sure screws would even hold, but at one end, the joint is right in the middle of a 2x4, at the other end it's just about even with the 2x4, so I may have to cut it off somehow. One one side of the curve, two studs have screws in them, on the other side, it's flat against 3, but I only screwed it to two. The two corner ones, the backdrop is curves an dnot attached. It does come inside the support blocks that are on each vertical to extend the attachment area for th eplywood ribs, so I'm going to consider that a tight enough radius. Big test will be to check the staytus tomorrow and see if it's ripping out the screws (the unerlayment will tear, not the 2x4) or if it snaps. It wasn;t making any ominous noises when I shoved it into place.

 There are only more 3 inside curves (that are 90 degrees) around the entire layout, so thus far I'll say it's more positive than negative. There are 2 right angle outside curves - that may be an issue.

                                      --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Bradford, Ontario
  • 15,797 posts
Posted by hon30critter on Sunday, March 29, 2020 4:40 AM

rrinker
Cons on underlayment backdrop (so far): It's much harder to get small radius curves than hardboard

I hope it works for you Randy. If not, there is always 0.080" styrene.

Dave

I'm just a dude with a bad back having a lot of fun with model trains, and finally building a layout!

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Sunday, March 29, 2020 12:16 PM

I might have to do something like that on the two outside curves to keep the backdrop close to the wall and curved. Or not curve it - the one is at the end of the added middle wall and the short wall before the helix, and it continues the town scene, so a building could disguise the 90 degree corner. Or even use a short piece at a 45. The other outside 90 is on the opposite side of this wall, where the branch turns down towards the door. If I make that a 90, I can probably hide it with some trees. 

 Directly opposite the one I already installed is the other inside corner, heading on to the wall with the yard. At the end of that, there will not be a curved backdrop going to the moveable section in front of the furnace, so the other sharp inside corner is all the way down at the far end of that wall (northeast corner on my plan) and then on the outside of the short wall for the branch to come off the helix and swing on to the outside of the added wall. It's a total of 6 more pieces to curve - upper deck over the one I alrerady did, upper and lower deck ontot he yard wall, upper and lower deck in the northeast corner, and one deck for the branch. And the upper deck pieces can be more wasteful of corner space, especially over the yard and town areas where I don't plan many sidings to avoid conflict with operators on the lower deck. Over the yard, the upper deck will mostly be a deep scenery area (well, 2' depth for a double track main and little else - so that's realtively high depth to track ratio). I considered spacing the backdrop out a bit ont he upper deck to reduce the depth, but at the same time I have to make sure the lighting is balanced - same number of strips in less area will appear brighter.

                                   --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Sunday, March 29, 2020 8:23 PM

 Well - FAIL.

It's still there. But I noticed the front (inside) veneer has cracked about half the width, just after the curve starts along the left side. Compressed in on itself too much. The back side, where it is stretched out - is just fine. Go figure. 

Time to get the hardboard - either Lowes or my plywood supplier has it.

 The underlayment I have is probably fine to make the 'hat' on top of the upper deck, at least in areas where it is no more than 18" wide, since they are all cut to 16" wide pieces. I'm not going to mix materials. Hardboard will handle the outside curves, too.

                                        --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: Canada, eh?
  • 13,375 posts
Posted by doctorwayne on Sunday, March 29, 2020 9:07 PM

rrinker
...There are only more 3 inside curves (that are 90 degrees) around the entire layout, so thus far I'll say it's more positive than negative. There are 2 right angle outside curves - that may be an issue....

1/8" Masonite applied atop 3/8" drywall at all corners, with the Masonite abutting 1/2" drywall.  Screwed, taped and mudded - no cracks, no joints to be seen.

Wayne

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Tuesday, March 31, 2020 7:20 PM

 Yesterday I prepped some more pieces, cut to length, drilled pilot holes. So today when I went to the basement, I was ready to go and get stuff built. I need to do more of this, work more in an assembly line fashion and complete a stock of pieces in one session and then use them in another.

 As such, I now have all the verticals on 2 walls of the yard/town room, and a lot of the support blocks in place. I even did a quick video update.

Back wall:

Back corner:

Rest of the 'new wall':

Video walkaround:

I may have to do silent videos from here on one, and put title cards in or something. I sound horrible. There is no editing - I just upload what I shoot. Straight from the phone.

                                 --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    December 2015
  • From: Shenandoah Valley
  • 9,094 posts
Posted by BigDaddy on Tuesday, March 31, 2020 7:24 PM

You sound OK, I think it's normal to think your own voice sounds terrible. 

Henry

COB Potomac & Northern

Shenandoah Valley

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Bradford, Ontario
  • 15,797 posts
Posted by hon30critter on Tuesday, March 31, 2020 8:59 PM

BigDaddy
You sound OK, I think it's normal to think your own voice sounds terrible. 

I would say that you sound great!. Your voice is clear and easy to understand, and the video progresses at a decent pace. Too many videos move at a snail's pace. Your's is good.

The only minor problem I had was that I had to crank the volume up to max. on my el cheapo computer speakers, and even then I had to listen carefully. No big deal.

Dave

I'm just a dude with a bad back having a lot of fun with model trains, and finally building a layout!

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Tuesday, March 31, 2020 9:16 PM

 Yeah, a phone isn't an ideal video device - if I have the screen in front of me so I can see what I'm shooting, then my mouth is not near the microphone. I guess I could try using my earbuds and recording through that microphone. Or see if I can boost the audio when I convert the video.

 I should show your post to my GF. She always says I don't speak clearly enough and she has a hard time understanding me. Maybe I just need to say "yinz" and "pop" Laugh 

 Have to see where I get tomorrow - I'm almost out of the little blocks, so I have to cut up another 2x4 and drill them. Or I can continue with the verticals down the yard side, I still have 10 more prepped. Otherwise it's time to break out the circular saw and the Kreg guide and start cutting plywood strips.

                                    --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Sunday, April 5, 2020 5:28 PM

 More of the support blocks added, and the first horizontal installed.

 Getting there. Need to get hardboard for the backdrops before I go much further.

Edit: oops, two of the same picture.

                                 --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    May 2010
  • From: SE. WI.
  • 8,253 posts
Posted by mbinsewi on Sunday, April 5, 2020 8:43 PM

Looking good Randy!  Your voice is fine. Yes  Nice progress.

Mike.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!