Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Question about Double Track Turn Radius!

6413 views
21 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2006
  • 20 posts
Question about Double Track Turn Radius!
Posted by Heartattack 19 on Tuesday, March 27, 2007 12:43 PM

Hello all, long time lurker!

I finally am able to begin constuction on a layout in HO scale! (The last one was taken down after a sewer pipe collapsed in my parents basement in 2003!).

 The table is an L-Shape with a 4x* sheet of plywood perpendicular to a 4X 6 sheet of plywood with a narrow 1 foot wide "bridge" connecting the two outermost ends of this "L" to make the track have continuous running in a triangular shape.

 I am planning on using Atlas code 83 track on 3 inch centers with the outer loop having a 24 inch radius.  I have already purchased all of the sectional track.  Would it be okay to make both the inner and outer loops 24 inch radius, since the track is a triangle and not a closed round loop, i can keep the three inch tack centers by using different length straight sections in the middle of the turn of the inner and outer curves.  I am sorry if this is hard to understand, i am just trying to figure it out so i can start building the layout!

Thank you for your help!

 

  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Poconos, PA
  • 3,948 posts
Posted by TomDiehl on Tuesday, March 27, 2007 12:53 PM
 Heartattack 19 wrote:

Hello all, long time lurker!

I finally am able to begin constuction on a layout in HO scale! (The last one was taken down after a sewer pipe collapsed in my parents basement in 2003!).

 The table is an L-Shape with a 4x* sheet of plywood perpendicular to a 4X 6 sheet of plywood with a narrow 1 foot wide "bridge" connecting the two outermost ends of this "L" to make the track have continuous running in a triangular shape.

 I am planning on using Atlas code 83 track on 3 inch centers with the outer loop having a 24 inch radius.  I have already purchased all of the sectional track.  Would it be okay to make both the inner and outer loops 24 inch radius, since the track is a triangle and not a closed round loop, i can keep the three inch tack centers by using different length straight sections in the middle of the turn of the inner and outer curves.  I am sorry if this is hard to understand, i am just trying to figure it out so i can start building the layout!

Thank you for your help!

 

It depends on how close to a circle the parallel section will be. If you go beyond a quarter circle you will be sure to run into problems, and you'll still need to put in straight sections on the outer loop to keep the tracks separated.

Smile, it makes people wonder what you're up to. Chief of Sanitation; Clowntown
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Tuesday, March 27, 2007 1:06 PM
Use a sheet of graph paper and make a scale drawing.  I think that you will find you cannot do what you envision because of the curve entrances and exits you would have to generate...not with 24" radii inner and outer.  The inner would be fine, and triangular, but the outer would have to be more ovoid and the curves would definitely need easements if you wanted the parallel straights actually to be parallel for much of their travel.
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Culpeper, Va
  • 8,204 posts
Posted by IRONROOSTER on Tuesday, March 27, 2007 1:09 PM

As long as you keep to a minimum 3" separation everywhere, you should have no problem.  I would suggest you cut a piece of wood (pencil, etc.) 3 " long and use it inner rail to inner rail (or outer to outer) to ensure that you have at least 3" everywhere.  One place too close together and your trains could clip each other when passing - especially if your running 80' passenger cars.

Enjoy

Paul 

If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: Colorado
  • 4,075 posts
Posted by fwright on Tuesday, March 27, 2007 2:10 PM
 Heartattack 19 wrote:

The table is an L-Shape with a 4x* sheet of plywood perpendicular to a 4X 6 sheet of plywood with a narrow 1 foot wide "bridge" connecting the two outermost ends of this "L" to make the track have continuous running in a triangular shape.

 I am planning on using Atlas code 83 track on 3 inch centers with the outer loop having a 24 inch radius.  I have already purchased all of the sectional track.  Would it be okay to make both the inner and outer loops 24 inch radius, since the track is a triangle and not a closed round loop, i can keep the three inch tack centers by using different length straight sections in the middle of the turn of the inner and outer curves.  I am sorry if this is hard to understand, i am just trying to figure it out so i can start building the layout!

Thank you for your help!

You might want to see if the place you bought the 24" radius will exchange it for 22" and 18" radius sectional track.  You cannot lay a half-circle of 24" radius on a 48" wide board.  The 24" radius measurement is from the centerline of the track.  And the diameter is twice the radius, or 48" track centerline to track centerline.  This means half your track will be hanging over the edge of your board.

So if you cannot make your boards wider (at least 4" wider!), then I recommend you drop down to 22" radius.  Twice 22" is 44" which leaves 2" on each side from the track centerline to the board edge - really is marginal for the safety of any trains derailing.  22" radius is the largest practical radius for a 4ft wide board.  The inside track can be 18" radius, or you can squeeze in a 19" radius by using flex track.

Sorry to be a balloon-buster.  It sounds like you have a good plan in mind.

yours in tracking

Fred W

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Culpeper, Va
  • 8,204 posts
Posted by IRONROOSTER on Tuesday, March 27, 2007 2:30 PM

Couple of additional thoughts on your plan, you'll probably have to cut some straights and have more than 3" in places if you use only sectional track.  Since you won't have perfect parallelism, you might want to consider using flex track for your outer curves and bending it to 27" radius - cut off the long rail after bending with rail nippers.  It'll look better also.

Enjoy

Paul 

If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Tuesday, March 27, 2007 10:50 PM

 Heartattack 19 wrote:
Would it be okay to make both the inner and outer loops 24 inch radius, since the track is a triangle and not a closed round loop, i can keep the three inch tack centers by using different length straight sections in the middle of the turn of the inner and outer curves.
Yes, No problem doing that at all.  That is basically offsetting the center of the curve by 3".  It doesn't matter if it is a closed loop or not.

I think this was a 2.5" offset on the straights.  Use whatever length needed to match your straight track separation. 

Obviously for your triangle you will also need a few more sections in the curve.  The greater the curvature over 90 degrees the less parallel the curves will be and the funnier it will look.

You could also put short sections of straight (like 1") between each curve.  That would make the curve more parallel but give the outside a more jiggy operational characteristic. 

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Wednesday, March 28, 2007 12:19 AM
Draw it out, please.  You'll find that it is geometrically impossible.  Draw two concentric triangles with 24" radii nested with 3" separation at their three apexes and see what you come out with.  It won't be pretty.
  • Member since
    August 2006
  • 20 posts
Posted by Heartattack 19 on Wednesday, March 28, 2007 9:38 AM

Believe me, i am familiar with that concept that you could no place two cocenbtric circles with the same radii inside of eachother boundary withought having thier outtermost boundary intercept! (Was a  Mathmatics major in college!)  I was going for the straight sections in the curve idea.  I would say the layout will look kind of like the Pocono ractrack (for those who like nascar!).

My very basic question is that to make the curves look right, you would want to start them at the same point, right?  If i go with equal radius curve sections, i would have to start the innermost curve at a different point than the outtermost curve to make it work. 

Just trying to work the kinks out, i played with the Right Track software and can make it work easily using 22" curves on the innermost track, but if i can get by with a larger radius, i would probably do that.  I know i could flex track it with minimal expense, this way using easements which would make the curve smoother, but i have serious doubts about my track laying ability!

Thanks again!

Mike 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Westcentral Pennsylvania (Johnstown)
  • 1,496 posts
Posted by tgindy on Wednesday, March 28, 2007 10:00 AM
 Heartattack 19 wrote:

Would it be okay to make both the inner and outer loops 24 inch radius, since the track is a triangle and not a closed round loop, i can keep the three inch tack centers by using different length straight sections in the middle of the turn of the inner and outer curves.

See this February 17th thread, Laying FlexTrack Curves, to thoroughly get your answers.

Since the dimensions here refer to N Scale => double the track spacing for HO Scale.  Example:  The suggested minimum of 1.25" would then be at least a minimum of 2.5"

http://www.trains.com/trccs/forums/1042099/ShowPost.aspx 

Can you do it:  Probably - Yes.

Should you do it:  Probably - No. 

Conemaugh Road & Traction circa 1956

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Wednesday, March 28, 2007 12:20 PM

Understood, Mike, and thanks for breaking it to me gently about your math abilities. Smile [:)] ..sorry if I seemed pedantic or insulting.  I was obviously highly keyed (fixed) on your use of the word triangular and that you wanted two concentric 24" curves.  I am far from educated in mathematics, believe me, so I simply took a compass and drew two nested arcs of the same radius.  Whhoooaaa, Nelly!  Triangle in an ovoid, yes, triangle within a triangle...when Hell freezeth over.

I hope you work it out.

-Crandell

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: Warren, MI O scaler
  • 553 posts
Posted by el-capitan on Wednesday, March 28, 2007 12:47 PM
 selector wrote:

Understood, Mike, and thanks for breaking it to me gently about your math abilities. Smile [:)] ..sorry if I seemed pedantic or insulting.  I was obviously highly keyed (fixed) on your use of the word triangular and that you wanted two concentric 24" curves.  I am far from educated in mathematics, believe me, so I simply took a compass and drew two nested arcs of the same radius.  Whhoooaaa, Nelly!  Triangle in an ovoid, yes, triangle within a triangle...when Hell freezeth over.

I hope you work it out.

-Crandell

Yes it can be done. Here is a picture showing. The radii are 24" (inside and out) and the parrellels are offset by 3".

 

 Check out the Deming Sub by clicking on the pics:

Deming Sub Deming Sub

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Wednesday, March 28, 2007 6:23 PM

Respectfully, because I don't want it to seem that I am obtuse, either deliberately or in reality, or that I am being argumentative, but I don't believe, if I am to take what my eyes tell me, that your arcs are the same.  It is perhaps just an illusory problem of perception.  Also, where they meet their tangents in the inner tracks, that they will successfully permit a locomotive and train to either exit or enter them due to their abrupt transitions from tangent to arc and vice-versa.  When I blow up your diagram, the transitions look considerably sharper.  Maybe in reality they wouldn't be much of a problem at all.

Perhaps our original poster will return and point out the inadequacy of my thinking.  I would sure like to know, one way or another, because this is an interesting problem...besides, I should know definitely as part of my gaining experience in the hobby.

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: Warren, MI O scaler
  • 553 posts
Posted by el-capitan on Wednesday, March 28, 2007 11:01 PM
 selector wrote:

Respectfully, because I don't want it to seem that I am obtuse, either deliberately or in reality, or that I am being argumentative, but I don't believe, if I am to take what my eyes tell me, that your arcs are the same.  It is perhaps just an illusory problem of perception.  Also, where they meet their tangents in the inner tracks, that they will successfully permit a locomotive and train to either exit or enter them due to their abrupt transitions from tangent to arc and vice-versa.  When I blow up your diagram, the transitions look considerably sharper.  Maybe in reality they wouldn't be much of a problem at all.

Perhaps our original poster will return and point out the inadequacy of my thinking.  I would sure like to know, one way or another, because this is an interesting problem...besides, I should know definitely as part of my gaining experience in the hobby.

I am a mechanical engineer. I have 15 years of experience on autoCAD which this drawing was done on. I have designed complex mechanical and structural systems using AutoCAD and other more advanced design programs. Not to mention the design for my layout which you can find in my signature. I assure you that this layout can be done.

 Check out the Deming Sub by clicking on the pics:

Deming Sub Deming Sub

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Wednesday, March 28, 2007 11:08 PM

In that case, I accept your claim, and will have to ponder it.

Thanks.

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: Warren, MI O scaler
  • 553 posts
Posted by el-capitan on Wednesday, March 28, 2007 11:12 PM
You can make the outer triangle infinitely big. Just move the upper arc up and the right most arc to the right and reconnect the ends. It doesn't need to be as close as my diagram shows. I was just showing the 3 inch track spacing. You could make the spacing 12 ft if you want.

 Check out the Deming Sub by clicking on the pics:

Deming Sub Deming Sub

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • 20 posts
Posted by Heartattack 19 on Thursday, March 29, 2007 9:32 AM

I apologize if i seemed overconfident, especially to you Selector, i appreciate all of the help you guys are giving me.  I do not mean to make any ripples, i have been a lurker for as long as i can remember and just now got up the confidence to start posting.  I love all the work that is done and displayed on the site and hope that one day you will enjoy what i have done.  I just wanted to say that fist!

Second,  i missed that thread posted here, it was a great deal of help.  What i should do then, if i am thinking clearly, is to make the inner track a 24 inch radius and the outer loop a 27 inch raduis, this way i can always keep my three inches of track separation.  If i can not do that, i will do the outer track in 24 inch and the inside track in 21 inch flex (or 22" sectional with the track seperation varing at diffferent points of the arc.)

It is great to bounce ideas here and i want to let you know i really appreciate it!

 

Mike 

 

 

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: Warren, MI O scaler
  • 553 posts
Posted by el-capitan on Thursday, March 29, 2007 12:04 PM
 Heartattack 19 wrote:

What i should do then, if i am thinking clearly, is to make the inner track a 24 inch radius and the outer loop a 27 inch raduis, this way i can always keep my three inches of track separation. 

That is what I would do. Your railroad will look more like a double track main line. In the version I drew up it looks like 2 single track mains with the separation in the corners. So it all depends on what "look" you want.

 Check out the Deming Sub by clicking on the pics:

Deming Sub Deming Sub

  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Chateau-Richer, QC (CANADA)
  • 833 posts
Posted by chateauricher on Thursday, March 29, 2007 5:31 PM

One thing I didn't see anyone mention was the need to have a wide enough space between tracks, especially on curves, to prevent side-swiping (trains hitting each other as they pass).

While, in HO, 3" is enough spacing for straight tracks; I'm not sure if it is sufficient for the curves.  You may need to increase the gap.  You'd be very wise to try a test set-up (particularly with your longest equipment) and see if 3" is enough.

You can use sectional track to easily incorporate easements into the curves by using larger radius segments to start, then using smaller ones nearer the centre-point of the curve and ending with larger ones again.  For example...   0-0-0-24-22-20-20-22-24-0-0-0 (or whatever sizes are available).  A simple, no-Doctorate-degree-needed, calculation-free way of getting some-what realistic easements.

 

Timothy The gods must love stupid people; they sure made a lot. The only insanity I suffer from is yours. Some people are so stupid, only surgery can get an idea in their heads.
IslandView Railroads On our trains, the service is surpassed only by the view !
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Canada
  • 121 posts
Posted by ghonz711 on Thursday, March 29, 2007 6:04 PM

Three inches should be more than enough.  I tacked down a 180 degree curve of 18inch radius sectional track and then had a curve around the outside at 21 inch radius flex track and even my full length passenger cars (completely stock Athearns except having their couplers swapped out for Kadees) passed each other with at least a quarter of an inch between the two cars, even with my 2-10-2 on the inside track.  Having your inside radius 24inchs and your outside even 26.5 inches flextrack (2.5 inch spacing) would be enough for most of the longest cars and locomotives to pass each other, at least from my experience.  I'm sure that the only things that would have major difficulty would be articulated locomotives and cars (autoracks etc.), however I do not own any rolling stock of either type. 

However, Chateauricher has a good point.  Easements would not only make your trains look much more realistic running through your curves, it also decreases the coupler overhang as the train enters the curve, allowing for even longer equipment to pass each other more smoothly.

Ghonz

- Matt

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • 20 posts
Posted by Heartattack 19 on Friday, March 30, 2007 9:17 AM

Thank you for all of your help!  I was thinking about easements, but had problems visualizing the offset to use the bent stick method i saw in MR a few months agoIs there some doctrine that you use for different Radii?  I will dig out that issue and re-read it again. 

I only went with a 3" track seperation because my Atlas track # 6 turnouts with a six inch straight section connecting the diverging rails for a crossover between parallel tracks made the three inch track seperation.  The track seperation is completely negotiable,  i messed around with 22" and 24" curves and puched the Walther commuter cars and an Auto Rack around and they seemed to clear eachother okay.  I was going to lay the outer triangle shaped loop first and the test from there.  I just do not want to fall in the trap of being so excited at running trains again that i rush through construction and create more problems and headaches!  

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Sunday, April 1, 2007 10:36 PM

 chateauricher wrote:
While, in HO, 3" is enough spacing for straight tracks;
Yikes, 3" spacing is way more than enough spacing for straight tracks.  On our club layout we purposely put the tracks way far apart so we could see between to read the numbers off the side of the car and the straight tracks are only 2.5" apart.  My double track modular units have the tracks at 2" centers.

I'm not sure if it is sufficient for the curves.  You may need to increase the gap.
3" is more than sufficient.  I often use 21.5-24 and 24-26.25" for double track curves where people are planning on using passenger equipment.  The more critical element is to make certain there aren't any kinks.  A kink will cause a sideswipe situation in a heart beat.  Of course I don't think full size passenger equipment starts to look OK until about 30" radius and really looks right at 40".

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!