Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

6 x 10 layout

1314 views
4 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
6 x 10 layout
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, December 12, 2006 10:24 PM

Anyone here has a 6x10 layout?  If so, can you pm me?  I want to see what it can be done and how it looks like.

Thanks,

Rudy

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,481 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Tuesday, December 12, 2006 11:04 PM

Mine is 5x12, which gives the same square footage.  For a free-standing "table" layout, 5 feet is about the maximum width, because you can't reach more than about 2 1/2 feet in from the edge to work on the layout or fix problems that might happen in the center.

I first put down a lower layer, just a simple loop with a passing siding, really, which is a subway system.  I ran two tracks up to the main layer, which is again a single loop with a passing siding, a crossover diagonal track, a yard off of that and a turntable and roundhouse.  There are a couple of other miscellaneous sidings, too.

The subways are almost completely hidden, and can only be directly seen from the edges where the stations are.  I've got a number of small lift-offs for access if, well, lets make that when, necessary.  I put a small video camera in the lead car of the subway train to see what's going on down below.

My computer disk crashed, so I can't post the track plan anymore.  Sorry.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: Colorado
  • 4,075 posts
Posted by fwright on Wednesday, December 13, 2006 10:10 AM

Model Railroader did a project layout - the Ma and Pa - that was 6ft x 10 ft.  It started in the December 1964 issue and ran through most of 1965.  The Ma and Pa featured 22 inch radius curves, Atlas #4 turnouts, and flex track. 

The big difference between the Ma and Pa and other MR project layouts is that it was designed to be built in phases.  The 1st phase was an oval with a couple of spurs.  Then a small yard was added.  If you got to the final phase, you had a loop-to-loop schematic, with a cutoff for a continuous loop.  There were 2 or 3 short passing tracks, and a 3 track yard, and reasonable switching opportunities. 

But running 2-3 trains simultaneously on a table-top loop to loop schematic is really much better suited to DCC (with auto-reversers installed), which of course wasn't available at the time.  If running more than one train with conventional DC on the Ma and Pa, block toggle and direction switch throwing would be an important skill.

my thoughts, your choices

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Wednesday, December 13, 2006 6:56 PM
 rudyy wrote:
If so, can you pm me?
PM? 
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Westcentral Pennsylvania (Johnstown)
  • 1,496 posts
Posted by tgindy on Wednesday, December 13, 2006 8:53 PM

 Texas Zepher wrote:
 rudyy wrote:
If so, can you pm me?
PM? 

 

= Private Message = at the top of your Forum Index Page.

Conemaugh Road & Traction circa 1956

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!