de N2MPU Jack
Proud NRA Life Member and supporter of the 2nd. Amendment
God, guns, and rock and roll!
Modeling the NYC/NYNH&H in HO and CPRail/D&H in N
Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's
Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.
Glenn -- PRR in Georgia
rrinker wrote: Basically, it just doesn't. You just curve it. It actually does have a line scribed to cut it apart if you really need to, but unless you are laying trolley radius curves it will flow nicely withoot any splitting, and it doesn't pucker on the inside or stretch too far on the outside. --Randy
jackn2mpu wrote: rrinker wrote: Basically, it just doesn't. You just curve it. It actually does have a line scribed to cut it apart if you really need to, but unless you are laying trolley radius curves it will flow nicely withoot any splitting, and it doesn't pucker on the inside or stretch too far on the outside. --RandyThanks for the reply. The tightest radius is 18 inches, so it looks like that won't be a problem.
I also found that the WS roadbed puckered when curving -- especially when getting down to 18" radius. I e-mailed WS customer support and they replied saying that the beauty of their foam was that it didn't need to be split (like cork) for curves -- just curve it in full pieces. I still found that splitting it was the best bet. I was using the 3' sections, not the rolls, and it did split easily.
Ultimately, though, -- for me -- the ultimate solution was to use cork. I like its sturdiness better, I like laying it better, and I like the way it looks better. WS is marketed as being quieter. Since I have both on the layout, I can easily compare... and find no difference in sound levels.