Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Super-elevation & roadbed height

6795 views
31 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2015
  • From: Shenandoah Valley
  • 9,094 posts
Posted by BigDaddy on Friday, August 10, 2018 6:41 PM

The direction of this thread confirms my belief that one should let dead threads rest in peace.

Henry

COB Potomac & Northern

Shenandoah Valley

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern CA Bay Area
  • 4,387 posts
Posted by cuyama on Friday, August 10, 2018 6:44 PM

jjdamnit
I apologize for not having enough room to build a pike that can utilize "best practices" in the mean time I will run my trains on my sub-standard pike and continue to enjoy this great hobby.

Most best practices apply everywhere because many are based on the laws of physics. Lots of folks build small layouts -- and they want them to run reliably. I've designed quite a few for clients, including some HO layouts smaller than yours. Small layout spaces don't change the laws of physics -- "abrupt" vertical kinks cause derailments no matter what size the layout.

I never said that your layout was "sub-standard". I asked a question about your claims and why they differed from your own earlier claims (as well as the experience of many model railroaders). You seem defensive and I've noted my concerns, so I'll bow out. 

I look forward to your photo posts in the future.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!