Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Spacing between track and foam scenery

1984 views
5 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 2,328 posts
Spacing between track and foam scenery
Posted by kasskaboose on Friday, November 16, 2018 8:25 AM

Is there a rule of thumb for the amount of space between track and scenery?  Some have cars that run hair's breath from their scenery.  I don't plan on getting that close but thought 1-2" betwen the cars and foam out-croppings, hills, etc. is suitable. 

Thanks!

  • Member since
    August 2013
  • From: Richmond, VA
  • 1,890 posts
Posted by carl425 on Friday, November 16, 2018 8:49 AM

Not just a rule of thumb, a standard.

You  need one of these:

I have the right to remain silent.  By posting here I have given up that right and accept that anything I say can and will be used as evidence to critique me.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Central Vermont
  • 4,559 posts
Posted by cowman on Friday, November 16, 2018 8:52 AM

I'm sure the prototype has some set distance that they try to keep car sides from ledge facings, as it would be pretty scarry to have walls inches away from windows as a car zipped by the rock face.  However, on my limited space HO 4x6 I took my longest cars and ran them along the tracks and marked where the overhang came.  I then stacked up some chunks of 2" foam, cut it back behind that line far enough so that a curved face made of Sculptamold in a tinfoil mold clears 40' cars by a little over half an inch.  Also, if you have locos with front overhang, be sure the outside of the curve accomodates the overhang. 

The rock cut is part of my scenic divider so that you can't see throough it from most viewing angles.

Good luck,

Richard

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 2,328 posts
Posted by kasskaboose on Friday, November 16, 2018 9:48 AM

Thanks all!  I have the multi-purpose gauge, so will use that to mark the distance between the track and foam.  No need to leave barely any space between cars and scenery. 

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 7,500 posts
Posted by 7j43k on Friday, November 16, 2018 10:40 AM

Regular railroad clearance width is 10'-8" (Plate B and C).

The NMRA gauge width is 15'.

 

I recommend you start making your determination with the NMRA gauge.  And then vary the clearances as necessary.  Like on the inside of curves.  Outside, too, for that matter.  You might even decide to lessen the clearances.  Maybe.

 

Ed

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,326 posts
Posted by selector on Friday, November 16, 2018 11:00 AM

kasskaboose

Thanks all!  I have the multi-purpose gauge, so will use that to mark the distance between the track and foam.  No need to leave barely any space between cars and scenery. 

 

Not so fast!  That gauge is a good indicator for most rolling stock on regular curves, but it may not be enough for your circumstances.  I would mock it up first, and check by running the actual items, coupled, towed and shoved, one way and then the other way, through those curves.  I have learned this lesson, and don't care to relearn it.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!