Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Layout / Benchwork Design software

5954 views
21 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2008
  • 10 posts
Layout / Benchwork Design software
Posted by tkirkley on Friday, July 29, 2016 2:20 PM

I've just finished getting my man cave ready for my first HO layout.  I'm trying to find the best software design tool that will:

1) Visually layout the benchwork & track work

2) Give me parts list for building each section so I know what to go buy at the hardware store

3) Print out diagrams in actual scale for trackwork.

4) Use a Helix design and benchwork requirements for it.

5) Multilevel layout design (2 levels for me).

6) Can handle a hump yard track setup (classification yard)

I prefer this to be Windows based, not on a phone or Mac.  

Thanks in advance...

Tom

  • Member since
    August 2013
  • From: Richmond, VA
  • 1,890 posts
Posted by carl425 on Friday, July 29, 2016 3:11 PM

XtrackCAD is what I use.  It will help you do all of what you want with the exception of helix specific benchwork.  It's also free.

you can find it at: http://www.xtrkcad.org/Wikka/HomePage

I have the right to remain silent.  By posting here I have given up that right and accept that anything I say can and will be used as evidence to critique me.

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • 10 posts
Posted by tkirkley on Monday, August 1, 2016 7:33 AM

Thanks for the info.  The Helix is not critical since I've already purchased one because I didn't trust my benchwork skills to create one from scratch.  I just want to incorporate it into the layout.

 

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 602 posts
Posted by NP01 on Monday, August 1, 2016 8:23 AM

I use 3rd Planit. I like it, has everything you asked for except a list of lumber bill of materials. I would recommend though that you do a general plan by hand in terms of towns, overall runs, etc.

CAD tools end up focusing you on small things and that is best when you have the big picture worked out. 

NP. 

  • Member since
    January 2011
  • From: Horsham, Pennsylvania
  • 412 posts
Posted by woodman on Monday, August 1, 2016 10:09 AM

How easy or hard is xtrackCAD to use for a novice?

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, August 1, 2016 10:57 AM

Unless you are quite familiar with CAD system, there is quite a learning curve to xtrackCAD.

I find SCARM (also a freebie) a lot easier to use and there are a number of video tutorials around. Unfortunately, SCARM does not support the design of a the benchwork, nor multideck layouts - yet!

  • Member since
    August 2013
  • From: Richmond, VA
  • 1,890 posts
Posted by carl425 on Monday, August 1, 2016 11:16 AM

woodman
How easy or hard is xtrackCAD to use for a novice?

I found it a little non-intuitive at first, but after an hour or so I got the hang of it.  Unlike Ulrich, I think my previous experience with CAD programs actually made it more difficult to learn - not easier.

I have the right to remain silent.  By posting here I have given up that right and accept that anything I say can and will be used as evidence to critique me.

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • 10 posts
Posted by tkirkley on Monday, August 1, 2016 12:34 PM

Great info to know.  Being that this is my first layout, I don't want to have to respend money redo-ing part of the layout when I could better spend it on trains.

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • 10 posts
Posted by tkirkley on Monday, August 1, 2016 12:38 PM

I have tinkered with CAD packages over the year, being that I'm in the computer field.  I wasn't sure though how detail oriented they were though comparing it to something like Auto-CAD.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 602 posts
Posted by NP01 on Wednesday, August 3, 2016 11:26 PM

AutoCad is a class if flexibility and accuracy of its own. But the typical MRR CAD tools are good enough accuracy fir what you are doing. The bigger challenge is to translate the design into physical ... IE laying out a curve on the table itself. 

Again though, a conceptual plan with the John Armstrong's "squares" method on a piece of paper is really important to do beforehand. A bit of CAD maybe to work out switch dimensions (CAD tools have most stock switches in their library) ... But really suggest you do the basic concept on paper. 

NP

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • 10 posts
Posted by tkirkley on Thursday, August 4, 2016 6:47 AM

Thanks for the info on John Armstong's "squares" method.  I see I need to get his book to review that info before I start my layout design.

 

  • Member since
    November 2013
  • 175 posts
Posted by Drumguy on Tuesday, August 9, 2016 9:11 PM
Armstrong's book is essential. It should be a permanent sticky on the Layout forum. I never read it until this spring, because it had "realistic operation" in the title. No offense to the operations folks here, but that's just not my thing so I never gave the book any thought. I might have a Pennsy GG1 next to an SP cab forward in my engine yard. I understand that it is an absurd situation, but it looks cool. Armstrong's book is more about effective planning and maximizing space--which probably translates very well to operations in our hobby, but it works equally well for those of us who are more into building our own thing, haphazard as it may be. As soon as the weather gets cooler, I'm tearing out the bench work and track I laid last winter, and starting over with a plan using many of Armstrong's techniques.
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 290 posts
Posted by steamnut on Tuesday, August 9, 2016 10:42 PM

Its not well known, but I use WinRail and recommend it. Much more intuitive than the CAD-based programs but nearly as storng.

  • Member since
    February 2016
  • 53 posts
Posted by Goosetown on Wednesday, August 10, 2016 12:17 AM

Sir Madog

Unless you are quite familiar with CAD system, there is quite a learning curve to xtrackCAD.

I find SCARM (also a freebie) a lot easier to use and there are a number of video tutorials around. Unfortunately, SCARM does not support the design of a the benchwork, nor multideck layouts - yet!

 

 

You can draw out the benchwork in SCARM.  Kinda.  Just use negative numbers for the legs and grid.  It's not what the OP desires with material lists and such, but you can see if anything will be in the way of switch motors or rivers, etc.

I'm struggling to insert a pic but if you go through the tutorials and youtube videos you will see how it's done.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, August 10, 2016 1:53 AM

Goosetown
You can draw out the benchwork in SCARM. Kinda.

The "Kinda" is what is worrying me! SCARM let´s you draw the benchwork, but it is rather a graphics function than a design function. I did that for my little layout resting on a small cabinet:

I still think SCARM is a marvelous tool! It´s creator, Milen from Sofia, is constantly updating it and adding functions to it. Given that it is a freebie, it´s an enormously powerful tool. I wouldn´t spent any $$ on buying a track planning program.

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • 10 posts
Posted by tkirkley on Wednesday, August 10, 2016 6:33 AM

That was my misconception as well.  I thought it was for operations, not layout design.  Thanks for the info...

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • 10 posts
Posted by tkirkley on Wednesday, August 10, 2016 6:34 AM

Thanks.  I'll download it and give it a try...

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • 10 posts
Posted by tkirkley on Wednesday, August 10, 2016 6:36 AM

I haven't even thought about YouTube.  I'll go take a look.

Thanks....

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • 10 posts
Posted by tkirkley on Wednesday, August 10, 2016 6:38 AM

I'd rather not spend a ton of money on basically a one-time use tool for design.

Thanks for the info...

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, August 10, 2016 7:12 AM

tkirkley

I'd rather not spend a ton of money on basically a one-time use tool for design.

Thanks for the info...

 

 
Layout planning has become a hobby within the hobby for me, so I use this tool quite often. I like planning small (very small) layouts - just for the fun of it.
 
This is my latest creation:
 
 
It´s a Marklin Nostalgia layout, like they were built as demo loayouts by the company in the 1950´s and 1960´s.
 
All objects (buildings, locos, cars) are drawn with SCARM, which was some job!
  • Member since
    February 2015
  • 223 posts
Posted by Choops on Wednesday, August 10, 2016 8:44 AM

Here is a link to solidworks website. 

http://www.solidworks.com/sw/products/free_2d_tools.htm

They offer their 2d software for free to use.  If you are interested in using cad you may want to try it.  there are lots of tutorials on youtube also.

Steve

Modeling Union Pacific between Cheyenne and Laramie in 1957 (roughly)
  • Member since
    March 2008
  • 10 posts
Posted by tkirkley on Wednesday, August 10, 2016 9:08 AM

Thanks for the link.  I've never heard of the software so I definitely want to give it a test.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!