Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

rate of rise?

7664 views
15 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 3 posts
rate of rise?
Posted by HOBrian on Sunday, July 12, 2015 10:10 PM

I have two questions.  I would like to know what the rate of rise is supposed to be for HO Scale track? As an example, for every one foot of horizontal there is "?" increase in heigth.  Also, because I couldn't find the search function for the Forum, does anyone know where to find it so I can search for answers for questiosn already asked?  Thanks, HOBrian

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Pittsburgh, PA
  • 1,796 posts
Posted by JoeinPA on Monday, July 13, 2015 9:13 AM

The search function is located on the right of the page under the title: Search the Community. There is no standard slope although many recommend a max of 2 to 2.5%. It all depends on your locos and your train length.

Joe

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • 868 posts
Posted by davidmurray on Monday, July 13, 2015 9:29 AM

Brian:

The rise is usually stated in percentage, or in inches of rise per 100 inches of run.

This translates to .24 inches rise per foot of run, at 2%.

Hope this helps.

Dave

David Murray from Oshawa, Ontario Canada
  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Monday, July 13, 2015 10:03 AM

Several years ago I purchased Stan’s Handy Converter, it has close to two dozen built in calculators for quick results for almost any model railroad question concerning formulas from wiring to speed.  It’s one of the best $20 investments I’ve ever run across.
 
 
Mel
 
 
Modeling the SP in HO scale since 1951
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 8,723 posts
Posted by maxman on Monday, July 13, 2015 10:13 AM

HOBrian
As an example, for every one foot of horizontal there is "?" increase in heigth.

Well, it's easier (to understand) if you use 100 inches rather than 12 inches (one foot).

1 inch rise over 100 inches is 1%, 2 inches rise over 100 inches is 2%, and so forth.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,619 posts
Posted by dehusman on Monday, July 13, 2015 12:20 PM
Handy way to think of it is use 8 ft, 96 in, as the run. 1 inch in 8 ft is about 1% grade.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • 2,616 posts
Posted by peahrens on Monday, July 13, 2015 12:46 PM

The Search the Community function on the right usually is iffy in finding what you want easily.  It tends to generate a reverse choronological list of anything that includes a word you use, including each thread response.  So it gets long and tedious.  Try it, but back that up with a google search such as "site: cs.trains calculating grade or rise".  Example such result below.

https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome-psyapi2&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8&q=site%3A%20cs.trains%20calculating%20grade%20or%20rise&oq=site%3A%20cs.trains%20calculating%20grade%20or%20rise&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i58.16928j0j7

 

Paul

Modeling HO with a transition era UP bent

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Pittsburgh, PA
  • 1,796 posts
Posted by JoeinPA on Monday, July 13, 2015 1:26 PM

MicroMark has a nice tool to check your grades: http://www.micromark.com/SearchResult.aspx?deptIdFilter=0&searchPhrase=miniature+digital+levelhttp://www.micromark.com/SearchResult.aspx?deptIdFilter=0&searchPhrase=miniature+digital+level

Joe

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 3 posts
Posted by HOBrian on Monday, July 13, 2015 2:58 PM

Thank you everyone.  The information is very helpful!  

 

HOBrian

 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Southeast Texas
  • 5,444 posts
Posted by mobilman44 on Monday, July 13, 2015 5:33 PM

Welcome to the Forum, and it looks like you got some good info.

Assuming you are working HO, and its a non logging or mining RR, a 2 percent max grade is probably a good rule of thumb.  Pulling power and realism decreases greatly with anything more.

ENJOY!

ENJOY  !

 

Mobilman44

 

Living in southeast Texas, formerly modeling the "postwar" Santa Fe and Illinois Central 

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 8,880 posts
Posted by riogrande5761 on Tuesday, July 14, 2015 8:00 AM

I think Maxman put it in the least confusing way.  A grade, or slope or rise, which is:

1% is 1 inch rise in elevation for every 100 inches in distance,

2% is 2 inches rise in elevation for every 100 inches in distance,

3% is 3 inches rise in elevation for every 100 inches in distance, etc.

Woodland Scenic's makes foam risers that will let you raise your track with grades in general ranges of 2%, 3% and even 4%, although 4% is quite steep and only recommended for short trains really.  I'd strongly recommend you keep your grades under 3%.  A max of 2% is a good idea to stick to if you plan on running long trains really although real railroads such as the D&RGW did have 3% grades on their Tennesee Pass route which was eventually closed down in 1996 due to it being a major operating expense requiring long helper sets etc.

Rio Grande.  The Action Road  - Focus 1977-1983

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: west coast
  • 7,613 posts
Posted by rrebell on Tuesday, July 14, 2015 12:00 PM

You can do 4% with no problem with diesels, more than that and you start to have issues. I have most of my layout dead flat but to get to the upper yard, I have 4% but it is fairly short, about 2' or less. I have a line running down from that area too but it is a much steeper 6%, looks good but dose not function well if I try to use it for anything other than I designed it, downhill. So if your railroad runs in only one direction, you can get by with a steeper downhill grade.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Tuesday, July 14, 2015 1:58 PM

How much grade is right for you is determined by two things:

  1. What can your model locomotives handle?
  2. What was appropriate to the prototype you follow?

What your locos can do is best determined with a test fixture.  Variables include (but are not limited to):  Weight on drivers, gear ratio, length of normal train, traction tires (or lack thereof)...

What the prototype you model had for standards.

The New York Central ("The Water Level Route") considered any deviation from dead level on the New York - Chicago main line to be a significant grade.  The West Albany Hill, 0.59%, frequently called for a pusher for passenger trains that had stopped at Allbany.

The 2.2% standard grade for the first transcontinental route was set by Congressional fiat - that being the ruling grade on the Baltimore and Ohio.

The ex-Southern (now NS) Saluda Grade averaged 4.24% for over two miles, with one short stretch that approached 5%.

The Madison Incline climbed a river bluff at 5.79%, the steepest standard gauge grade in the US - ever.

In the area I model the JNR had 2.5% grades on a very busy secondary mainline.  Elsewhere, the Usui Grade (now abandoned) was 6.8% and the Hakone Tozan Railway operates electric MU cars on 8% grades.

The Grande (now Cumbres and Toltec Scenic Railway) has a 4% climb from Chama to the summit at Cumbres.  The Uintah (which ran the prototypes for those Mantua 'logger' 2-6-6-2Ts) climbed 8% grades and wrapped around street corners to cross Baxter Pass.

In my own modeling, I run short trains of (mostly) short cars on my 2.5% mainline grades, doubleheading or adding helpers as necessary.  My short line to the collieries climbs 4% with shorter trains of shorter cars - three teakettles (20 total drivers) on a mixed train with only 6 cars.  My grades ARE steep, because I deliberately designed them that way.

Chuck (Modeling Central Japan in September, 1964)

Moderator
  • Member since
    May 2009
  • From: Waukesha, WI
  • 1,761 posts
Posted by Steven Otte on Tuesday, July 14, 2015 2:05 PM

As dehusman pointed out, 8 feet = 96", which is close enough to 100" for most purposes. So 1" rise in 96" = approximately 1%, as was stated.

Luckily, 8 feet is a nice round power of 2 that's easy to break down to shorter lengths. Divide it in half, and that means the same 1" rise over 4 feet would be a bit more than 2%. Do that again, and you find 1" rise over 2 feet would be just over 4% (which is probably the maximum you want to do in any scale, unless you're running geared steam).

Break it down into fractions and you can deal with 1 foot lengths. Over a span of 1 foot, 1/4" rise = 2%, 1/2" = 4%.

When I built my layout, I created a set of cardboard curve templates of varying radii (18", 20", 22" and 24"; since each curve could have a different radius inside and outside, two templates covered all four radii). I then used a tape measure curved around each radius to mark the length of run that would give me 0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, and 2% grades for each X amount of rise. For example, 2 feet of run (less than a quarter circle on an 18" radius) gives me 1% with a 1/4" rise and 2% with a 1/2" rise. This made it easy to plan my grades around curves, which can be tricky to measure with the typical long-stick-and-a-bubble-level technique.

--
Steven Otte, Model Railroader senior associate editor
sotte@kalmbach.com

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,619 posts
Posted by dehusman on Tuesday, July 14, 2015 3:38 PM

I took some 1/8" thick material and made a "step gauge" a series of stair steps each 1/8" high.

I used a 2 ft level so each 1/8" step is .5% grade.   I mark each step for the grade.  I put the step at the low end of the level and adjust it so its in the bubble and I have set the grade.  No math.  If I want a 1.5% grade, I put the level on the 3rd step.  3/8" in 2 ft, 3/4" in 4 ft, 1.5" in 8 ft.

Use a 4 ft level and you can get to 1/4% grades if you are that exacting.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • 23 posts
Posted by Trainman Barrett on Thursday, July 16, 2015 7:28 PM
Just a note, make sure you make the change to your max percentage gradual: 1/2%-1%-11/2%-2%, etc. Otherwise you'll find cars uncoupling at the start or end of the incline.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!