Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

#7.5 or #8 Turn Out Question

1839 views
11 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Seattle Area
  • 1,794 posts
#7.5 or #8 Turn Out Question
Posted by Capt. Grimek on Sunday, May 3, 2009 4:10 PM
A brief addendum question to the sheet cork to ribbon cork thread... On that t.o. on the grade coming up from/down into the city yard, I've purchased and drawn in a #7.5 t.o. It's placement is about 8 1/2" from the zero elevation (t.o. completely on the grade) and placed on a 30" radius curve. This turn out reduces that radius to 28" very briefly. My MAIN QUESTION: I'm planning on operating a Big Boy and Challenger (HO) and considering that this current #7.5 t.o. is close to the yard, is it a big deal giving up that extra 2" radius for a very short section of track? I hate to spend another $30+ on a #8 if it's not going to make more than a tiny difference in loco dependability. This will be coming off an A/D track so I'm thinking yard speed restrictions would be in place...what would you do? Something like 6"-10" of the 80" long curve would be at 28" the remaining (roughly 70"-almost 6 feet) at 30" radius... Thanks very much. I'm getting ready to lay this track and cork and being the weekend when more folks have time to respond, I thought I'd ask. Hopefully my last question about this graded area!

Raised on the Erie Lackawanna Mainline- Supt. of the Black River Transfer & Terminal R.R.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Sunday, May 3, 2009 4:56 PM

 Not sure where you are getting the numbers, but the Radius of Closure Rail for a #6 in HO is 43" - that's the TIGHTEST radius in the turnout. A 7.5 and 8 would be considerably larger. Even a #6 would not reduce your 30" radius curve.

                         --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern CA Bay Area
  • 4,387 posts
Posted by cuyama on Sunday, May 3, 2009 6:35 PM

The clue is that he called it a #7 1/2. I imagine he's talking about a Walthers curved turnout and the tighter leg is indeed listed as a 28" R.

One should bear in mind that the actual effect on rolling stock is porbably a little more severe than the stated radius on turnouts owing to the need to negotiate through the frog portion.

In any case, the safest bet would be to try the #7 1/2 curved turnout with the locomotive on the grade. Mock it up, then one would know for sure. Most likely it will work, but if you have a stretch of 28" radius, then that's the minimum radius. It doesn't matter how many feet of 30" radius you have on either side.

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Seattle Area
  • 1,794 posts
Posted by Capt. Grimek on Sunday, May 3, 2009 7:07 PM
Thanks Cuyama and Randy. Yes, I should have stated, it's a Walther's code 83 #7.5. If no one who's installed this combination (#7.5 coming off of a 30" R curve with those locos) I'll go ahead an mock it up. Would I be able to tell by merely pushing the loco through with my hand in both directions? I'm not wired up at all yet. Does it make any/much difference with articulateds if the drivers aren't turning under power just "sliding" through with my hand? Thanks.

Raised on the Erie Lackawanna Mainline- Supt. of the Black River Transfer & Terminal R.R.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Sunday, May 3, 2009 7:18 PM

 There's probably a slightly greater tendancy to climb the outside rail if the wheels are turning vs just pushing the loco, but you should be ok. What brandh locos are these? Most of the common plastic and metal models of even the Big Boy are made to operate on as little as 18" radius, in some cases 22" is specified as the minimum. They don;t LOOK good going through such tight curves, but mechanically they handle it.  Only in brass are you likely to find models made without the unprototypical articulation of the cheaper plastic models. On the read thing, the rear engine was fixed and the front engine pivoted from a point just ahead of the rear engine's cylinders. A brass model made as an exact replica will likely require even bigger than 30" radius curves to run reliable, a plastic or metal model from AHM/Rivarossi, BLI, Trix, or Athearn will pivot both engines more or less like a diesel loco and can usually handle very tight curves. Your bigger issue will likely be clearance if there is a second track outside of this one - the boiler overhang can intrude on an appoaching train or lineside details.

                                                --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Seattle Area
  • 1,794 posts
Posted by Capt. Grimek on Sunday, May 3, 2009 7:46 PM
Thanks Randy. These are Athearns. I've got 3" clearance between adjacent tracks on the paper template, but good reminder. I'll go see if this "new/additional" turn out changes that anywhere...as I wasn't originally planning on using this #7.5. I'm trying to use it to add another through track through the yard as well as doubling as a "terminal" track under the station. It was originally going to be used to get into some serial staging under the mainline which is elevated, but I'm now thinking that's not going to be worth the trouble later. (Hidden AND serial staging!)...Maybe not. Hey, while I've got you here, can you post the link to your own layout? I was enjoying and getting inspiration from yours before our old computer died..

Raised on the Erie Lackawanna Mainline- Supt. of the Black River Transfer & Terminal R.R.

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 121 posts
Posted by gerhard_k on Sunday, May 3, 2009 9:40 PM
Capt. Grimek
Thanks Cuyama and Randy. Yes, I should have stated, it's a Walther's code 83 #7.5. If no one who's installed this combination (#7.5 coming off of a 30" R curve with those locos) I'll go ahead an mock it up. Would I be able to tell by merely pushing the loco through with my hand in both directions? I'm not wired up at all yet. Does it make any/much difference with articulateds if the drivers aren't turning under power just "sliding" through with my hand? - Thanks.

In some previous posts on this board, there was discussion about the fact that the inside radius of the Walthers curved turnouts is tighter than stated by Walthers. I have the following notes: "Don Z made measurements of each to determine the correct radii. They are: #6.5 is 24" outside and 16.5" {!!} inside {20" published by Walthers} #7 is 28" outside and 20.5" inside {24" W} #7.5 is 32" outside and 24" inside {28" W} #8 is 37" outside and 30" inside {32" W}"

And dante wrote: "I carefully checked the radii by drawing various curves and overlaying the turnouts and found the following: #6 (or 6.5; some labeling confusion): 24/18 #7: 28/22 #7.5: 32/26 #8: 36/30"

So there may not be total agreement as to the exact sharpness of the curves, but you can't go wrong assuming the worst case. And I would not feel very confident about learning anything by skidding the locomotive through the turnout... Setting up a temporarily-powered full simulation would seem to be worth the trouble, considering the eternal frustration of building it and then finding out it won't work.

"We didn't have time to do it right, but we found the time to do it over."

Best of luck - Gerhard

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Monday, May 4, 2009 6:38 AM

Capt. Grimek
Thanks Randy. These are Athearns. I've got 3" clearance between adjacent tracks on the paper template, but good reminder. I'll go see if this "new/additional" turn out changes that anywhere...as I wasn't originally planning on using this #7.5. I'm trying to use it to add another through track through the yard as well as doubling as a "terminal" track under the station. It was originally going to be used to get into some serial staging under the mainline which is elevated, but I'm now thinking that's not going to be worth the trouble later. (Hidden AND serial staging!)...Maybe not. Hey, while I've got you here, can you post the link to your own layout? I was enjoying and getting inspiration from yours before our old computer died..

 

  Mine? It's in the signature under every message I post  http://www.readingeastpenn.com

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,300 posts
Posted by Sperandeo on Monday, May 4, 2009 9:07 AM

Hello "Capt. Grimek,"

The Athearn Big Boy and Challenger, afflicted as they are with what a friend of mine calls the "curse of Rivarossi," will have no trouble operating on a 28-inch radius curve. These models are built with both engines (each set of drivers and cylinders is an "engine") swiveling like diesel trucks, following the lead of the Rivarossi Big Boy and Y6b introduced in the 1960s.

In real articulated locomotives, the rear engine and the boiler/firebox are rigidly joined, and only the front engine can swing under the boiler. The front engine pivots on a pin between the rear cylinders.

The models' double articulation does allow them to negotiate train-set curves, and also reduces the boiler overhang on curves by a considerable degree. Nevertheless, many of us would prefer more realistic articulation, which among other things would allow realistic steam pipe connections to the rear cylinders. I know that's practical for HO models, because I used to have a brass D&RGW 2-8-8-2 that operated reliably on 22-inch radius curves.

So long,

Andy
 

Andy Sperandeo MODEL RAILROADER Magazine

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: PtTownsendWA
  • 1,445 posts
Posted by johncolley on Monday, May 4, 2009 10:31 AM

Jim, not wired yet? Here's a tip that works for DC or DCC. Take a scrap piece of plywood (or one you can use as the base of your command station panel) drill some holes in it and mount yout command station and power supply on it with plastic tie-wraps. Add a pair if 3 foot wire leads and alligator clips on each. Now you have a test unit you can use anywhere on your layout or workbench. If DCC just plug in your hand-held throttle and you are good to go! For power feed you can use an extension cord and if desired a plugstrip also tie-wrapped to the board! John.

jc5729
  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Seattle Area
  • 1,794 posts
Posted by Capt. Grimek on Monday, May 4, 2009 8:39 PM
Gerhard, I hear ya! That's why I'm asking these super analytical questions. This is my last layout in this lifetime so I want to do it right and not have to redo any more than "naturally" occurs. Randy, I guess we both have A.D.D. today ;-) your mistaking my #7.5 for a #6 in my post and me not seeing your link just sittin' there all the time! In my case it's probably glue fumes... Thanks very much Andy for the info. on the articulateds. I was concerned about the abrupt change from 30" to 28" without an easement, etc. basically. Sounds like it won't be an issue and I'll take John's primer to wire up and give it all a go. The ironic thing is that this t.o. is meant to bring some trains into hidden serial staging and once I finally give this a go, I might find that that'll be more trouble down the road than it's going to be worth and possibly limit my already minimal scenic space... I'll do a test run and then decide. I think I've gotten the transition from the original post's flat cork to roadbed transition area,where the grade begins (zero elevation) to look natural enough. I carved around the right angles to make it a scalloped land form /edge. Thanks very much for the help as always.

Raised on the Erie Lackawanna Mainline- Supt. of the Black River Transfer & Terminal R.R.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Monday, May 4, 2009 9:07 PM

 Well, my brain fart was thinking you meant a #7.5 STRAIGHT turnout, not curved ones, which of course do come with a 28" inner radius. I only posted the RCR and substitution radius for a #6 straight turnout because I had the numbers handy - and noted a 7.5 turnout would be even less of a curve. All failing to realize you were talking about the Walthers CURVED turnouts. All in all, it worked out in the end, so, what the heck.

                                   --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!