Login
or
Register
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Home
»
Model Railroader
»
Forums
»
Layouts and layout building
»
Benchwork, a means to an end, or wasted money?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p><font color="#ff0000">Mike,</font></p><p><font color="#ff0000">Running 24 gauge wire through 2 inch foam is not trivial.</font> </p><p>Umm, well. Yes it is. Quite trivial compared to the many other skills necessary in building a layout. I'm not sure why you think it's a big deal.</p><p><font color="#ff0000">Conduit would make it possible, but that is more of a hastle than drilling a hole in plywood.</font> </p><p>C'mon, Joe. You can't seriously call something that takes, what, 10 seconds a hastle. If you're in that much of a hurry...</p><p><font color="#ff0000">The main problem I find with foam is the ridiculous expectations that are set by those who hard sell it on the web and in the hobby shop.</font> </p><p>It sounds like the only ridiculous expectations were yours.</p><p><font color="#ff0000">I have tried it, expected it to save time, lower cost and improve quality. It did none of those for me.</font> </p><p>Frankly, I've never seen anyone say it would save that much time or money. It isn't cheap and anything worth doing well takes time. As for quality, it sounds like you're blaming the tools, not the technique.</p><p><font color="#ff0000">My views and words about foam were formed by my own experiences with the material, not some intellectual endeavor</font>. </p><p>And mine are formed by having built three layouts with it and learning more each time I use it. No intellectual endeavor here, nor by others who post here about there ACTUAL EXPERIENCES with it.</p><p>I'm not going to do a blow by blow rebuttal, but the rest of your post sounds a bit like sour grapes over bad technique. </p><p>But I must add - you do realize that some "foamers" use WS Plaster cloth on top of foam, don't you? For several years I had a "how-to" posted on how to do it. Very nice results.</p><p><font color="#ff0000">Foam has proved to be of no value to my modeling, and has resulted in unsatisfactory results every where I have used it.</font> </p><p>And the fault lies with the foam, of course, not the technique...</p><p><font color="#ff0000">The pictures I see on the web, well, I try to not be personal, but I don't see very many successes.</font> </p><p>Others do see them, of course. And some get published in MRR...</p><p><font color="#ff0000">Your milage may vary, I tell it like I see it.</font></p><p>As do I.</p><p> <font color="#ff0000">A bias is an unreasonable, unsupportable conclusion.</font> </p><p>In a word, no. Most biases are entirely supported by experience and are quite reasonable. I'm biased towards Guiness Stout over Bud Light. I'm biased towards not speeding when I drive. </p><p>I'm biased towards using foam for scenery, but have no problems with other techniques that folks have sucessfully used and certainly don't go around criticizing them. </p><p> </p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Users Online
There are no community member online
Search the Community
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter
See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter
and get model railroad news in your inbox!
Sign up