Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
I questioned the integrity of RR-Track, with regards to tubular O, after failing to have it duplicate two of my existing layouts. Even with the wiggle/compensation factor maxed out, the layouts would not line up in multiple locations. The support guy said my track had to have been forced together for the software not to be able to recreate it. It is a fact that tubular is giving and forgiving, and found it interesting that the real track was laid without any apparent or intentional "force" fitting. I run all types of consists without problems, yet the virtual world of RR-Track is telling me it can't be done! I would presume the software is more effective with rigid types of track. RR-Track, sorry, but your "forced together" explanation is little more than a convenient excuse (IMHO). Other than that, hopefully future upgrades will fix the tubular shortcomings. Sounds like plenty of folks here have no problems with RR-Track, but in my situation it has proven to be untrustworthy, and therefore of little value. "Try it before you buy it" applies here. Wish I would have! <br /> <br />Rich. <br />
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag