Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

How deep, small river?

5014 views
22 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Sweden
  • 2,082 posts
How deep, small river?
Posted by electrolove on Tuesday, July 18, 2006 6:10 AM
How deep do you guys recommend modeling water (small river) to give it a realistic look?
Rio Grande Zephyr 5771 from Denver, Colorado to Salt Lake City, Utah "Thru the Rockies"
  • Member since
    March 2006
  • From: Texas
  • 202 posts
Posted by conagher on Tuesday, July 18, 2006 6:58 AM

Often the depth can be determined by what colors you paint the bottom of the river...with darker colors suggesting deeper water. The colors become lighter and more rocks are visible as you get closer to the shore.

I assume you're modeling the Colorado Rockies. Most of the rivers or stream banks are very rocky with less water depth (in comparison to the Mississippi River) so you should also consider that the water runs through rapids and contains lots of sediment. The Colorado River, for example, is deep in places but also has rapids...some areas are crystal clear and others are very brown. The depth of your river is generally dictated by water width and the slope of the riverbank down to water's edge.

I use the 2-part Enviro-Tex. Just follow the instructions on the side of the box...it's easy. I do not make rivers (streams or creeks) very deep because thicker Enviro-Tex takes much longer to dry and tends to crack.

I'd check out Mike Danneman's book for some ideas Amazon.com: Scenery for Your Model Railroad (Model Railroader): Books: Mike Danneman

Göra nöje och njuta av din järnväg

 

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Sweden
  • 2,082 posts
Posted by electrolove on Tuesday, July 18, 2006 7:24 AM
It's the Arkansas River at the D&RGW hanging bridge I'm talking about. I don't know how deep it is, but I think it's not that deep.
Rio Grande Zephyr 5771 from Denver, Colorado to Salt Lake City, Utah "Thru the Rockies"
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Tuesday, July 18, 2006 9:17 AM

Faster flowing mountain rivers are fast and relatively shallow.  It will be a challenge to get "the look", but if you paint it up well, pour a two part epoxy, and then ripple it with a layer of gloss medium that is dabbed with facial tissues to get the ripples and wavelets, it should look good.

 

Again, preparation of the river bed will be 80% of it.  You will have to place scale rocks and the odd boulder, and the shading will have to be right.

  • Member since
    March 2006
  • From: Texas
  • 202 posts
Posted by conagher on Tuesday, July 18, 2006 9:22 AM

 electrolove wrote:
It's the Arkansas River at the D&RGW hanging bridge I'm talking about. I don't know how deep it is, but I think it's not that deep.

This is on Hwy 24 north of Buena Vista CO on the Arkansas River.

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Southern Colorado
  • 752 posts
Posted by jxtrrx on Tuesday, July 18, 2006 9:25 AM

You're right,electro.  It's not that deep.  I live on a cliff on the bank of the Arkansas (I'm about 40 miles downstream from the hanging bridge) and depending on the season you could often walk across it and not get your knees wet.  It is a little deeper than that at the bridge, and as Crandall says often lots of small rapids.

I hope someone will have a specific answer to your question though.  How deep to model?  An inch? Six inches?  I'm wondering the same thing.

-Jack My shareware model railroad inventory software: http://www.yardofficesoftware.com My layout photos: http://s8.photobucket.com/albums/a33/jxtrrx/JacksLayout/
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Sweden
  • 2,082 posts
Posted by electrolove on Tuesday, July 18, 2006 9:54 AM
Yes please tell me guys how deep I must model it. Will 1 inch be enough?
Rio Grande Zephyr 5771 from Denver, Colorado to Salt Lake City, Utah "Thru the Rockies"
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,856 posts
Posted by wjstix on Tuesday, July 18, 2006 10:37 AM
Six inches would like 43 feet deep in HO scale !! Shock [:O] If you paint the riverbed properly, you should be able to give the illusion of depth without really having the depth.Using Enviro-Tex I think for a river you would only need maybe 1/4" to 1/2" tops. BTW it's better to use several thin pours, rather than one big deep one.

FWIW I've good luck on a flat surface, painting the "water" on and using acrylic gloss to add the water sheen and ripples/waves. Easy and no smell like resin produces.Disapprove [V]

Stix
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Arcadia, Fl.
  • 19 posts
Posted by GAPRR on Tuesday, July 18, 2006 10:48 AM

All of my lakes, ponds & streams are only about 3/8th's of an inch deep for rivers & some streams are only about 1/8th of an inch. The depth is brought on by the colors of the bottom up to the banks at the edge. The last pour of whatever I use is always a gloss to get the reflections off your surrounding scenery. I've never used invirotex in all the years I've been modeling. The thing that you have to look at is; If it's not what you want on the 1st pour, add another different color & pour it again. I have some ponds that look real deep that are only about 1/8th of an inch thick. Then I have some that I didn't like the color combinations & started all over again. These are thicker. I use a lot of rocks around the edges to hide any imperfections & then add reeds, small bushes, & other scenery & that also gives your water depth. Everyone has their own idea's & most of them were trial an error. You have to just get in their & try something, even if it's wrong. You can always start over & sometimes the 2nd, 3rd & 4th times makes what you wanted. LOL

 

Larry

You can't tell which way the train is going by looking at the track.
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Sweden
  • 2,082 posts
Posted by electrolove on Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:00 AM
Do you have any pictures to show me of your finished water?
Rio Grande Zephyr 5771 from Denver, Colorado to Salt Lake City, Utah "Thru the Rockies"
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Manitou, Okla
  • 1,630 posts
Posted by mikesmowers on Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:50 AM
Here is one of my river. I put small rocks in the bottom and did not paint anything. the river is only about 1/8'' deep. hopes this helps.             Mike


This one is of my pond / small lake, it is about 1/4'' deep

Hope this helps.                 Mike

Modeling Trains Is Not A Matter Of Life Or Death, It Is Much More Important Than That!!
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Tuesday, July 18, 2006 12:30 PM

EL, you would make no more than two 2 mm thick pours of your epoxy.  Even that would be a bit thick, but not objectionable.  Remember, you must then add a 1-2 mm layer of gloss medium to get the wave effect and the ripples or rapids.  You could bet away with only 2 mm total (!) if you had the painting done well below it, and wanted a deep, slow river with no boulders lurking in the depths.  But you will model a very fast, shallow stream with lots of "white water" around partially submerged rocks and boulders.   So, the easy way was the first way, but you won't have an easy time of it.  You will have to take your time and play with arrays of rocks and shrubs.  Then, add enough epoxy to partially submerge the rocks  (hint- pick rocks that are flat on one side and bulbous on the other.  Lay the flat side down on the painted surface, and let the epoxy flow around and over the higher portion to create the real look).  Also, when you go to dab the gloss medium over the epoxy, you should cover each little rock that is NOT fully submerged with tape to keep the tops looking dry in the sun... just like in real life.

 

This is going to require a small practise piece, EL.

  • Member since
    March 2006
  • From: Texas
  • 202 posts
Posted by conagher on Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:27 PM

Here's a scene where I dabbed Enviro-Tex paste directly to the surface of black & green painted table top with a small paint brush, lifting slightly to create the rapids effect. The pond is no more than 1mm deep and was done by dabbing paste, not pouring resin as I've done elsewhere on the layout.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Tuesday, July 18, 2006 6:37 PM
I think you have done very good work there, Cam!   Would it be possible to post a photo with a bit better focus?  Maybe it is just me, but I have trouble seeing it clealry.
  • Member since
    March 2006
  • From: Texas
  • 202 posts
Posted by conagher on Tuesday, July 18, 2006 7:58 PM

 selector wrote:
I think you have done very good work there,   Would it be possible to post a photo with a bit better focus?  Maybe it is just me, but I have trouble seeing it clealry.

Thank you for the compliment. I tried to enlarge the photo as I posted it but couldn't get it any bigger. I could send it as an email in the original size which is much larger and easier to see all the details. Plus I have other views of the stream and pond if you're interested....

  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Chateau-Richer, QC (CANADA)
  • 833 posts
Posted by chateauricher on Tuesday, July 18, 2006 9:41 PM
 conagher wrote:

 selector wrote:
I think you have done very good work there, Cam!   Would it be possible to post a photo with a bit better focus?  Maybe it is just me, but I have trouble seeing it clealry.

Thank you for the compliment. I tried to enlarge the photo as I posted it but couldn't get it any bigger. I could send it as an email in the original size which is much larger and easier to see all the details. Plus I have other views of the stream and pond if you're interested....

Cam...  You've got some amazing water going on there !  Please, post more photos so we can be inspired by your excellent work.

 

Timothy The gods must love stupid people; they sure made a lot. The only insanity I suffer from is yours. Some people are so stupid, only surgery can get an idea in their heads.
IslandView Railroads On our trains, the service is surpassed only by the view !
  • Member since
    October 2005
  • From: Ulster Co. NY
  • 1,464 posts
Posted by larak on Tuesday, July 18, 2006 10:50 PM
Lots of great advice here!

Remember though the the term "small" river is subjective. Here in the Hudson Valley a small river is 200 feet across and 15 - 20 feet deep. Our creeks vary from 30 feet across and six feet deep to about that size. Anything less is a stream or brook.

Choose your scale size from the area that you are modeling. And yes, you can use color to give the illusion of greater depth.

Long story short. 1" is plenty, maybe more than you need unless you are putting boats into (not on) the "water".


The mind is like a parachute. It works better when it's open.  www.stremy.net

  • Member since
    March 2006
  • From: Texas
  • 202 posts
Posted by conagher on Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:20 PM

Please, post more photos so we can be inspired by your excellent work. Timothy

Thanks but I cannot take all the credit. The layout belongs to my buddy although I did alot of the water, rock cliffs and shorelines....help's been needed as he's gotten older.

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Northern Ca
  • 1,008 posts
Posted by jwar on Wednesday, July 19, 2006 1:58 AM

Here is a picture of the Ca Zepher heading your way, winding along the Feather River.

The river is painted to get the depth and I applied realistic water about 1/16 thick, used mat gloss and mat medium in the rapids after I roughd up the water with glue, the whitwater is extreamly light and is an off white(cream) Being the Feather has lots of moss and algie I went a blue green and I thijnk I capured it as per my pictures of the Feather. 

 

 

John Warren's, Feather River Route WP and SP in HO
  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: Phoenixville, PA
  • 3,495 posts
Posted by nbrodar on Thursday, July 20, 2006 11:47 PM

Here's Barger Run on my layout:

The rough opening is about 2 inches deep.  I then built up the bottom using drywall mud, WS course ballast and several grades of talus.   I used WS Realistic Water, poured in two 1/8" pours (1/4" total) for the water.

Nick

Take a Ride on the Reading with the: Reading Company Technical & Historical Society http://www.readingrailroad.org/

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: SINGAPORE
  • 246 posts
Posted by ATSFCLIFF on Friday, July 21, 2006 12:02 AM
Depth is the illusion you create by playing with colors. Usually, painting the base with black or dark blue will give you that deep look for your rivers or streams. I use acrylic medium to do water scenes.
Cheers,

http://cliffordconceicao3310.fotopic.net/c328807.html
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 21, 2006 1:07 PM

electrolove, I've never been into the Royal Gorge but I am somewhat familiar with the Arkansas River below Texas Creek; when I was living in Colorado Springs many, many years ago I drowned a lot of worms in those waters.
The upper reaches of the Arkansas may not be the Mississippi but it is still a rather substantial stream and an awful lot of water has to squeeze through that narrow canyon.  I remember seeing something somewhere sometime stating that the river drops as much in the ten miles below Texas Creek as in the thirty miles above it - or figures close to that - somebody from the region enlighten me.

The river flowing through the gorge itself doesn't appear to be nearly as "dirty" as, say, the Verde here in Arizona but a certain amount of sediment is being conveyed downstream so you would not want to model it as a pristine blue.  Remember, the reason for your "hanging bridge" is because there was not, at that location, any kind of bank to support roadbed.  The river is flowing fast, and relatively deep, and is always going to be scraping earth off of the walls of the canyon.

I thought Conagher's outlined methods came as close to perfection as I have seen recently.  To my experience, water is about the most difficult scenery technique to master; you know you have great scenery when people want to stick their finger in your "water" to get it wet; that's "real" water.  And remember, as was said, if you use envirotex - I do - "Thin is In"
      

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • 394 posts
Posted by ham99 on Saturday, July 22, 2006 1:03 PM
Using Environtex Lite, you are limited to pours of 1/8" or less.  I did four pours on my river, so it is about 3/8"-1/2" in depth.  Darker paint in the middle of the stream gives the appearance of depth.  I put fish in the next to last pour [as well as a couple of Preiser fishermen].  My experience has been that anything over 1/2" is hard to cure and may crack in time.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!