Trains.com

Classic Train Questions Part Deux (50 Years or Older)

849640 views
8166 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,014 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Thursday, April 18, 2024 5:37 AM

Bingo!   And i thought you pointed out the one missimng, the 9ith, and its connections (ownership and partisal terminal use and a bus connection) with Erie.  Possibly it was RC. 

And in addfition, do ask nthe next question.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,326 posts
Posted by Overmod on Wednesday, April 17, 2024 7:18 PM

I had Susy-Q in there but the Kalmbach site crash took it out!

Does London & Port Stanley count?

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,014 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, April 17, 2024 8:44 AM

Considering its ownership and location, the interurban, whech always had dreight interchange with steam railroads, went somwhat "far-a-field for a Stillwell design.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,014 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, April 16, 2024 10:02 PM

You got seven, and there are two more.  One associated with Erie, but not Erie, and one a north-south oriented interurban that may be used today as a freight branch of a very large freight railroad system.

Note that the NYW&B MUs were not used by the NYNH&H as MUs out of NYCity, but replaced the last New Haven woods in Boston commuter service and were replaced post-WWII by parlor heavyeweights reseated for commuter service, keeoing their existing air-conditioning.   Boston still had plenty of woods on the B&M.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,326 posts
Posted by Overmod on Monday, April 15, 2024 6:41 PM

Erie, of course.  Meeting up with H&M, but NOT with H&M-PRR joint service (which was Gibbs).  Then you could get on BMT equipment, or toddle north on the IRT to the NYW&B.  And (later) New Haven.  C&EI, C&WI, let me see if I remember any other pre-preservation uses...

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,479 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Monday, April 15, 2024 1:53 PM

rcdrye

C&O(of I) and EL shared a couple of miles of track east of State Line Crossing in Indiana, including the Hammond Station.

 
C&O had trackage rights over Erie/EL between State Line and Griffith.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,014 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Monday, April 15, 2024 9:10 AM

Change ogf ownership of the operation, with lille or no cgange of service sdoes not make a different service for answering this question.  But here is a hint:  One see saw, and  through much of the classic period, three different services with Stillwell equipment, with one of these only within the city, plus there were two other services linked to the city but outside.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 4,977 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Sunday, April 14, 2024 4:37 PM

C&O(of I) and EL shared a couple of miles of track east of State Line Crossing in Indiana, including the Hammond Station.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,014 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Sunday, April 14, 2024 12:31 AM

I knew about the Big Four, and thus the C&O thriugh cars, using both LaSalle and Central, and the C&O South Shore Hammond connection but not the Hammnd connection with the Erie.

 

Name eight different rail operations that used Stillwell-designed passenger cars.

 

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 4,977 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Saturday, April 13, 2024 6:05 PM

C&O of Indiana operated into Central station for a couple of years after 1910 before cutting back service to Hammond, Indiana.  C&O proper had through cars to both Central Station (via Big 4) and LaSalle Street (The Sportsman handed cars over to NYC in Toledo).  After 1948, C&O's Pere Marquette District used Grand Central, and after 1968, C&NW's CPT.  The C&O of Indiana listed timetable connections in Hammond with the Erie (Dearborn) and CSS&SB (getting Randolph St), with C&O tickets honored.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,014 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Friday, April 12, 2024 6:26 AM

You stated connectins, not just through cars.  I was not aware f any thrugh C&O sleepoers to Chicago other than on the Big Four.  But possibly that is the answer you want.

Or stasying with Florida service, possibly the Central of Georgia.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 4,977 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Friday, April 12, 2024 5:57 AM

Southern cars ended up at Central, LaSalle, or Dearborn.  Never got close to Grand Central or C&NW's CPT.  You do have part of the correct answer embedded in yours, though.  Keep in mind the period 1910 to 1971.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,014 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Friday, April 12, 2024 4:52 AM

OK  The Southern    Had through cars or good connections from Florida to Chicago for the C&EI, B&O, Big Four/NYC, and IC; and the PRR was not a "friendly" connection to Chicago, only to NYCity.

I asked the question, because if you insisted, you could get a ticket using the Southern and the PRR from Florida to Chicago.  I doubt that anyone did, except possibly someone needing stop-overs in towns only meeting that routing.

One could also use the C&O's local Chicago train, most of its life requiring the South Shore from Hammond to Chicago, ending up at Randolf Street.  Of couse any IC Randolf Street train connected with IC and Big Four intercity trains at Central.  The B&O ended up at Northwestern, but mostly used Grand Central. The Big Four used La Salle at times, as welll as IC/s Central.

 

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 4,977 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Thursday, April 11, 2024 8:49 AM

Of course I can't say "never", but the Pullman car lines involved were all of very long standing, and while the only railroad that might have handled the cars to Union did handle connecting cars from this railroad, it was never a friendly connection to the Chicago area.

The connecting trains that didn't carry through cars did honor tickets reading "Chicago" on this carrier.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,014 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Thursday, April 11, 2024 7:33 AM

Are you asbsolutely certain that Union Station never had a connecting train?

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 4,977 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Wednesday, April 10, 2024 6:48 PM

Three stations had the railroad's own trains - one of them later got through cars but not at the same time the railroad's trains called there.  One Station - only through cars.  Two stations served connections only.

Randolph St.

Central

Dearborn

LaSalle Street

Grand Central

North Western CPT

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,014 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, April 10, 2024 1:57 AM

Each station except Union:  BOTH through caes and connections or through cars and/or connections?

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 4,977 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Sunday, April 7, 2024 1:10 PM

Between 1910 and 1971 passenger trains, through cars on passenger trains, and connections to passenger trains operated under this railroad's name operated out of every downtown Chicago station except Union Station.

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,479 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Sunday, April 7, 2024 10:04 AM

rcdrye is correct.  It's your question.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 4,977 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Sunday, April 7, 2024 7:02 AM

C&ME cars would issue and accept transfers with Milwaukee Northern cars before MN was absorbed by TMER&L.  

Milwaukee cars ran under the Chicago and Milwaukee Electric name until the end of service.  C&ME owned the track on Wells used by TM for a few blocks, even after C&ME abandoned service north of the 6th and Michigan terminal.  The C&ME cars charged a 5 cent fare to the end, undercutting TM's 6 and later 7 cent fares.  The south end of the line at Oklahoma Avenue was reached from the street by a steep wooden stairway.

C&ME cars also had deeper flanges than most street railways.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,014 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Sunday, April 7, 2024 1:38 AM

Two that I can think of:  1) NO transfers issued to any other transit service; and 2) marker lights (night) and flags (day).

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,479 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Thursday, April 4, 2024 10:11 AM

New question.  The Milwaukee streetcar service of North Shore Line had one rather unusual characteristic.  What was that characteristic?

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 4,977 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Thursday, April 4, 2024 7:51 AM

The turbos were also shop queens - frequently replaced by other equipment.  If my fuzzy memory is correct they were leased from United Aircraft.  I suspect no one in Amtrak operations was really very sorry to see them go (to CN).

The RTG turbines used in midwest service were as successful as equipment run under conditions very different from those they were built for could be.  Unfortunately that lesson - and the lesson that aircraft manufacturers were not the best bet for railroad equipment - led to the less successful Rohr turbos.  

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,014 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Thursday, April 4, 2024 12:06 AM

Note that Turbo-Train sewrvice on the Amtrak NEC did end up rerouted into Pennsylvania Station before it was discontinued, and both directions had an across-the-platform connecton with a Metroliner.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,326 posts
Posted by Overmod on Wednesday, April 3, 2024 6:36 PM

Harley's Hornet!

A stated reason for market failure of the TurboTrain on the ex-New Haven part of the NEC (and NYC into GCT) was the diversion of one of the trainsets to the West Virginia service...

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 4,977 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Wednesday, April 3, 2024 2:12 PM

Correct!  The ratio seemed to be about one label per passenger.  Started with leased C&O equipment, it got a United Aircraft TurboTrain set for a few months, then leased B&O equipment.  Nominally an "experimental" run between Washington and Parkersburg W. Va. on B&O's main line to Cincinnati, it traversed Senator Robert Byrd's state of West Virginia. 

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,479 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Wednesday, April 3, 2024 1:55 PM

This run would be the Potomac Turbo, Potomac Special, West Virginian and possibly other names between Washington and Parkersburg WV.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 4,977 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Wednesday, April 3, 2024 11:21 AM

This Amtrak route, long since dropped, operated either with leased conventional equipment (including boiler-equipped GP9s) or with completely inappropriate equipment under several names in the 1970s.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,014 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Friday, March 29, 2024 8:24 AM

You are abslutely correct, and I'm going back and making the correction in my question.  Thanks, and l look forward to your question.

SUBSCRIBER & MEMBER LOGIN

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

FREE NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter