Trains.com

Did the Boston & Albany 4-6-6Ts have stokers?

2621 views
1 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2011
  • 38 posts
Did the Boston & Albany 4-6-6Ts have stokers?
Posted by 03 1008 on Thursday, May 9, 2024 1:48 AM

After enjoying the preserved (ex) CSD 477.013 last weekend in Bohemia the question arose whether the massive B&A 400s had stokers, too, like the CSD 4-8-4Ts.

https://www.steamlocomotive.info/vlocomotive.cfm?Display=22081

Any ideas? 

Many thanks in advance and best wishes from Germany, Helmut

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Friday, May 10, 2024 7:11 PM

To my knowledge none of the B&A double-enders ever had stokers, either the 4-6-6s or the 'thermodynamically-rebuilt' older engines.

The 4-6-6s were a bit like the Maffei 4-cylinder Pacifics in that they were very imposing from the front, but much smaller when you got around to the side... I think of them as roughly comparable to other wide-firebox 4-6-0s.

Their weight on drivers (180,000 to 190,000lb. depending on what you read) would have qualified them to get stokers... if they had been built after 1939, and been used in 'fast' passenger service (see the Alaska Railroad letter from 1943 about the law's applicability to power of comparable size built earlier...)

Total bunker capacity was only 6T so how much shoveling could there be between local stops even with a ~61' grate?

SUBSCRIBER & MEMBER LOGIN

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

FREE NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter