international passenger news

18734 views
149 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July, 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Friday, July 21, 2017 3:15 PM

Buslist

 

 
schlimm

 

 
Buslist

 

 
blue streak 1

UK is putting on hold further expansion of electrification due to cost over runs and lack of supplies.  Also note that article states system is at capacity much of day.  That may be the reason that supplies are in short supply ?

http://www.railwaygazette.com/news.html

 

 

 

 

 

Those delayed projects are now canceled. 

http://m.railjournal.com/index.php/europe/britain-cancels-major-electrification-projects.html 

 

Let's follow the U.K. model as some have suggested!

 

 

 

The UK cuts are part of continued austerity by the failing Theresa May government and a Brexit-damaged economy.

 

 

 

Has nothing to do with Network Rail's mismanagement and its inability to accurately estimate the costs, even to the point where that ability has been part of the question sessions in Parlement. Note the mention of cost overruns in the OP. This whole thing was falling apart long before the Brexit vote. 

Suggest you invest some time reading the official Journal of the UK's Railway Study Association. Espically Roger Ford's "informed sources" colum. 

 

Thank you, I will.  It also seems obvious that you have a very strong negative bias, based perhaps on your past history with the UK rail scene?

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    November, 2013
  • 1,096 posts
Posted by Buslist on Friday, July 21, 2017 5:28 PM

schlimm

 

 
Buslist

 

 
schlimm

 

 
Buslist

 

 
blue streak 1

UK is putting on hold further expansion of electrification due to cost over runs and lack of supplies.  Also note that article states system is at capacity much of day.  That may be the reason that supplies are in short supply ?

http://www.railwaygazette.com/news.html

 

 

 

 

 

Those delayed projects are now canceled. 

http://m.railjournal.com/index.php/europe/britain-cancels-major-electrification-projects.html 

 

Let's follow the U.K. model as some have suggested!

 

 

 

The UK cuts are part of continued austerity by the failing Theresa May government and a Brexit-damaged economy.

 

 

 

Has nothing to do with Network Rail's mismanagement and its inability to accurately estimate the costs, even to the point where that ability has been part of the question sessions in Parlement. Note the mention of cost overruns in the OP. This whole thing was falling apart long before the Brexit vote. 

Suggest you invest some time reading the official Journal of the UK's Railway Study Association. Espically Roger Ford's "informed sources" colum. 

 

 

 

Thank you, I will.  It also seems obvious that you have a very strong negative bias, based perhaps on your past history with the UK rail scene?

 

 

I guess if you call knowledge bias. Actually what I'm doing is presenting facts not baseless speculation. Something coming from someone that critizes amatures making comments is your area of expertiese. Why are you so biased against facts? Making up excuses like Britexit and presenting them as if they are facts?

  • Member since
    July, 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Saturday, July 22, 2017 1:20 PM

Buslist
I guess if you call knowledge bias. Actually what I'm doing is presenting facts not baseless speculation. Something coming from someone that critizes amatures making comments is your area of expertiese. Why are you so biased against facts? Making up excuses like Britexit and presenting them as if they are facts?

Just my opinion based on correspondence with several friends in the UK. But I will acquiesce to your knowledge base and look at the website you've mentioned.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    November, 2014
  • 89 posts
Posted by ORNHOO on Sunday, July 23, 2017 7:45 PM
Anybody interested in seeing a TGV "flying formation" with a Rafale fighter jet? http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/new-french-high-speed-train-gets-fighter-escort-for-som-1796755373
  • Member since
    July, 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Sunday, July 23, 2017 8:01 PM

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    November, 2013
  • 1,096 posts
Posted by Buslist on Tuesday, July 25, 2017 9:14 PM

schlimm

 

 
Buslist
I guess if you call knowledge bias. Actually what I'm doing is presenting facts not baseless speculation. Something coming from someone that critizes amatures making comments is your area of expertiese. Why are you so biased against facts? Making up excuses like Britexit and presenting them as if they are facts?

 

Just my opinion based on correspondence with several friends in the UK. But I will acquiesce to your knowledge base and look at the website you've mentioned.

 

You might want to look at this item, written for the non rail professional. Note last year's cost overruns by Network Rail are almost 1/2 as large as the entire Caltrain electrification.

 

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/business/business-news/rail-electrification-swansea-cardiff-been-13357575

  • Member since
    November, 2013
  • 1,096 posts
Posted by Buslist on Friday, July 28, 2017 11:35 AM

The East Coast Main Line franchise in the U.K. is in trouble again. It is beginning to look like it will fail for the third time. Last time National Express walked away from it turning it back to the government. Since then National has totally exited the rail scene.

In this case the franchise holder (Virgin Trains East Coast, Virgin 10%, Stagecoach 90%) over estimated their revenue. The losses are severely effecting  publicly held Stagecoach's financial performance. There is now a great deal of hand wringing trying to decide what's next. Options range from a complete renegotiation of the franchise to letting VTEC walk away from it.

One of the reasons cited for the revenue shortfall is Network Rail's inability to deliver route improvements to get the London Edinburgh journey time down sufficiently (I haven't followed this bit of activity to know anything about the why's and wherefores, only what's reported in the press), among other factors. It will be interesting to watch, this may require a shakeup of the whole U.K. franchise procedure/concept.

 

BTW with the exit of National Express there are now said to be more operators based outside the U.K. (DB, SNCF, MTR, Trenitalia etc.) than U.K. ones.

  • Member since
    November, 2013
  • 1,096 posts
Posted by Buslist on Tuesday, August 01, 2017 12:42 PM

It now seems that Network Rail is admitting that progress might be better working with other entities.

http://m.railjournal.com/index.php/track/network-rail-opens-door-to-private-sector-participation.html

  • Member since
    July, 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Tuesday, August 01, 2017 5:44 PM

Buslist

It now seems that Network Rail is admitting that progress might be better working with other entities.

http://m.railjournal.com/index.php/track/network-rail-opens-door-to-private-sector-participation.html

 

Very interesting!  Is it possible the fault isn't whether public or private ownership, since it seems like neither has worked well in past or is working now, but that it is something inherent about the UK? Private operation franchising is not working so well for passenger trains, either.

Maybe time to return to British Rail?

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    November, 2013
  • 329 posts
Posted by VOLKER LANDWEHR on Wednesday, August 02, 2017 8:51 AM

Buslist
Since then National has totally exited the rail scene.

National Express operates commuter (regional) lines in Germany.
Regards, Volker

  • Member since
    November, 2013
  • 1,096 posts
Posted by Buslist on Wednesday, August 02, 2017 1:09 PM

VOLKER LANDWEHR

 

 
Buslist
Since then National has totally exited the rail scene.

 

National Express operates commuter (regional) lines in Germany.
Regards, Volker

 

Correction, exited the U.K. rail scene with the sale of the C2C franchise.

In Europe its Germany only, with 2 active and 2 more to come on line in the future. They are also eyeing the Spanish market.

  • Member since
    January, 2007
  • 189 posts
Posted by azrail on Wednesday, August 02, 2017 2:48 PM
Network Rail (the company that controls the tracks and infrastructure) is gov't controlled. It would have been better to split up BR back to the Big 4 railways (GWR,LMS,LNER,Southern)
  • Member since
    November, 2013
  • 1,096 posts
Posted by Buslist on Wednesday, August 02, 2017 3:32 PM

azrail
Network Rail (the company that controls the tracks and infrastructure) is gov't controlled. It would have been better to split up BR back to the Big 4 railways (GWR,LMS,LNER,Southern)
 

 

"December 2013, the ONS announced that from September 2014, Network Rail will be classified as a "government body". This resulted in the company's debt of £34 billion being added to the national debt."

 

"Network Rail is effectively a subsidiary of the Government-controlled SRA."

  • Member since
    January, 2005
  • 34 posts
Posted by krtraveler on Thursday, August 03, 2017 9:56 PM
  • Member since
    July, 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Thursday, August 03, 2017 10:29 PM

As I was saying, maybe there is something inherent in the UK that makes rail a struggle?

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    November, 2013
  • 1,096 posts
Posted by Buslist on Friday, August 04, 2017 12:39 AM

schlimm

As I was saying, maybe there is something inherent in the UK that makes rail a struggle?

 

And the fact that SNCF was not broken up into more than 130 companies as was BR. That and its vertical disintegration has been minimal. I thought I read somewhere that the EU is not happy with them because of insufficient separation of infrastructure and operating companies. Open access seems to be almost nonexistent.

 

Note that just now the French are preparing to contract out some local services which the Brits have been doing for about 15 years and the Germans 5-10(?).

 

http://www.railwaygazette.com/news/single-view/view/regions-prepare-for-market-opening.html

Working on a summary of my thoughts on the U.K. situation, will post in a day or 2.

 

  • Member since
    July, 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Friday, August 04, 2017 11:53 AM

Buslist

 

 
schlimm

As I was saying, maybe there is something inherent in the UK that makes rail a struggle?

 

 

 

And the fact that SNCF was not broken up into more than 130 companies as was BR. That and its vertical disintegration has been minimal. I thought I read somewhere that the EU is not happy with them because of insufficient separation of infrastructure and operating companies. Open access seems to be almost nonexistent.

 

Note that just now the French are preparing to contract out some local services which the Brits have been doing for about 15 years and the Germans 5-10(?).

 

http://www.railwaygazette.com/news/single-view/view/regions-prepare-for-market-opening.html

Working on a summary of my thoughts on the U.K. situation, will post in a day or 2.

 

 

I'm looking forward to it.  

German private operations are not just local but quite regional in scope in some cases. There are many and most seem well run.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    December, 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 8,328 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Monday, August 07, 2017 9:17 PM

Gotthard base tunnel passenger traffic up 30% since opening to traffic.  Also freight traffic up but is restricted since other tunnel not complete.

http://www.railjournal.com/index.php/europe/strong-start-for-gotthard-base-tunnel.html?channel=537

 

  • Member since
    November, 2013
  • 1,096 posts
Posted by Buslist on Thursday, August 10, 2017 8:47 AM

Trenitalia pulls out of bidding for a U.K. franchise. It tends to reinforce my feelings that the problem with the franchises is the process and conditions. I have been trying to articulate this in my U.K. situation write up. But having worked mostly on the infrastructure side my observations on the operators may be less spot on. I'll get it finished one of these days.

http://m.railjournal.com/index.php/main-line/trenitalia-pulls-out-of-south-eastern-franchise-contest.html

  • Member since
    July, 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Thursday, August 10, 2017 11:47 AM

Buslist

Trenitalia pulls out of bidding for a U.K. franchise. It tends to reinforce my feelings that the problem with the franchises is the process and conditions. I have been trying to articulate this in my U.K. situation write up. But having worked mostly on the infrastructure side my observations on the operators may be less spot on. I'll get it finished one of these days.

http://m.railjournal.com/index.php/main-line/trenitalia-pulls-out-of-south-eastern-franchise-contest.html

 

Given the nature of GB, that sounds like another Herculean task for you. But I would like to read that if you undertake it.

Is it possible operators appear to underestimate costs or some deliberately makes low-ball bids, thinking they will get some 'help' later?

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    November, 2013
  • 1,096 posts
Posted by Buslist on Friday, August 11, 2017 9:30 AM

schlimm

 

 
Buslist

Trenitalia pulls out of bidding for a U.K. franchise. It tends to reinforce my feelings that the problem with the franchises is the process and conditions. I have been trying to articulate this in my U.K. situation write up. But having worked mostly on the infrastructure side my observations on the operators may be less spot on. I'll get it finished one of these days.

http://m.railjournal.com/index.php/main-line/trenitalia-pulls-out-of-south-eastern-franchise-contest.html

 

 

 

Given the nature of GB, that sounds like another Herculean task for you. But I would like to read that if you undertake it.

Is it possible operators appear to underestimate costs or some deliberately makes low-ball bids, thinking they will get some 'help' later?

 

Don't know that I've ever seen them deliberately underestimate costs. (The franchasie proposal review process ought to catch that). But they do seem to overestimate revenue that includes increases from enhancements to both infrastructure (shorter trip times) and new rolling stock. Not sure any of them got "help" in the sense we might mean it. Remember for the major franchises the usually is a payment to the govt. for the privilege of running the trains.

Just to put things into perspective here is a list of enhancements that the train operator (JREast and others in this case) to win the Midlands Franchise.

 

The new franchise runs from December 2017 until March 2026. ‘We will be investing nearly £1bn into the network, delivering new trains, better stations and a whole host of other benefits for passengers’, said Abellio UK Managing Director Dominic Booth. This will include:

  • 100 new coaches for Birmingham's Cross-City Line and 80 for the Snow Hill Line by 2021. Discussions are currently underway to select a supplier. The Cross-City Line would have 'metro style services' using high-capacity vehicles similar to those used on London Overground with wide doors and a focus on standing room. 
  • 225 new vehicles for London services by 2021, with others to be refurbished; 
  • 'Modern trains' for the St Albans Abbey line; 
  • An extra 20 000 extra rush-hour seats in Birmingham, and 10 000 extra seats and standing room for 5 000 more passengers in London; 
  • Various additional services, including on Sundays; 
  • Free wi-fi on all main line services by the end of 2019; 
  • Mobile and laptop charging points on all London services by May 2021; 
  • Smart ticketing with 'better value tickets for part-time workers', and smart cards for the Northampton - London and St Albans Abbey lines; 
  • Refunds of 25% for delays of more than 15 min, as well as the current 50% for 30 min and full refunds after 60 min; 
  • Improved services for passengers requiring assistance; 
  • Live capacity information via mobile devices; 
  • A closer partnership between the operator and infrastructure manager Network Rail; 
  • £70m investment in new and existing depots; 
  • £60m of station improvements including additional parking spaces for 1 000 cars and 2 500 bicycles, and a cycle hire scheme; 
  • 800 real-time information screens at 150 stations; 
  • Feasibility studies for new stations in the West Midlands.
  • Member since
    December, 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 8,328 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Friday, August 11, 2017 5:38 PM

Any information about the Egyptian RR passenger train that rear ended another pass train ?

  • Member since
    July, 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Friday, August 11, 2017 8:07 PM

Buslist
Just to put things into perspective here is a list of enhancements that the train operator (JREast and others in this case) to win the Midlands Franchise.

That's a lot of investment cost.  No wonder operators drop out.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    December, 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 8,328 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Friday, September 15, 2017 8:52 PM
  • Member since
    December, 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 8,328 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Thursday, September 28, 2017 9:41 PM

Apppepars Network rail ( UK) is replacing some variable tension CAT with constant tension CAT ?

http://www.railwaygazette.com/news/single-view/view/uk-railway-news-round-up-30.html

 

  • Member since
    June, 2002
  • 13,279 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Monday, October 02, 2017 6:34 AM

Europe's second largest railroad station building, a ghost station, on the French - Spanish boarder, is going to re-open.

Pull up the website:  www.bbc.co.uk/news/maga

  • Member since
    July, 2010
  • From: Louisiana
  • 1,418 posts
Posted by Paul of Covington on Monday, October 02, 2017 1:46 PM

daveklepper

Europe's second largest railroad station building, a ghost station, on the French - Spanish boarder, is going to re-open.

Pull up the website:  www.bbc.co.uk/news/maga

 

   I sure hope they succeed in the resurrection.   It's always sad to see a beautiful building die from neglect.

http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-41445860

_____________

   My mind's made up.   Don't confuse me with the facts.

  • Member since
    December, 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 8,328 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Friday, October 13, 2017 9:22 PM

International passengers operators that use Kobe steel products may have quality concerns because of Kobe specification false certifications.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/12/business/kobe-steel-japan-trains.html?emc=eta1&_r=0

 

  • Member since
    March, 2007
  • From: Old Sarum (UK)
  • 98 posts
Posted by cogloadreturns on Tuesday, October 17, 2017 10:04 AM

schlimm
 
Buslist
Just to put things into perspective here is a list of enhancements that the train operator (JREast and others in this case) to win the Midlands Franchise.

 

That's a lot of investment cost.  No wonder operators drop out.

 

 

The majority of which is underwritten by the taxpayer. Especially the rolling stock.

"Windy Militant leads his Basque like corn grinders to war.........." HMHB - Trumpton Riots.
  • Member since
    June, 2002
  • 13,279 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, November 21, 2017 10:45 AM

TOKYO — It may have been the most profusely regretted 20 seconds in history.

Living up to Japan’s reputation for being precise as well as contrite, a train company in Tokyo delivered a formal apology on Tuesday because one of its trains left a station just 20 seconds early.

In a country where conductors will beg forgiveness when a train is even a minute late, the Metropolitan Intercity Railway Company posted an apology on its website Tuesday for “the severe inconvenience imposed upon our customers” when the No. 5255 Tsukuba Express train left Minami-Nagareyama station in Chiba, a suburban prefecture east of Tokyo, at 9:44:20 a.m., instead of as scheduled at 9:44:40 a.m.

According to the statement, the train arrived at Minami-Nagareyama on time, at precisely 9:43:40 a.m. But when it came time to leave, the overeager crew closed the doors prematurely and pulled out of the station ahead of schedule. According to Metropolitan Intercity, no passengers missed the train or complained about the jump-start.

Photo
 
Passengers at a railway station in Tokyo. A train company apologized to customers after an express left a station early. Yes, you read that right. Credit Behrouz Mehri/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

 

The effusive apology was in keeping with a culture where an ice cream company ran a television advertisement to express regret for raising the price of an ice cream bar by 10 yen last spring.

 

As the foreign news media began to cover the news Thursday, observers abroad expressed envy on Twitter at the trainspotting exactitude.

 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy

Search the Community