Trains.com

Lake Shore Limited: Blocked again

1146 views
5 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 1,470 posts
Lake Shore Limited: Blocked again
Posted by NKP guy on Monday, November 13, 2023 6:28 PM

A few months ago it was a falling-down building that blocked the tracks in Albany.  Then last month it was a Westchester hillside sliding down and blocking the four track mainline near Croton.  Today it's a parking garage in Manhattan with "structural issues" above the Empire line on the West Side near 10th Avenue that's blocked trains between NYP and Spuyten Duyvil:  

 https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/amtrak-suspension-between-nyc-albany-continues-over-safety-concerns-at-a-parking-garage/4857233/?_osource=SocialFlowFB_NYBrand

 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,377 posts
Posted by Overmod on Monday, November 13, 2023 7:34 PM

Story says affected riders can use their tickets on Metro-North between Croton-Harmon and "New York Penn Station".  That, I'd like to see.  Although I'm not surprised that slipped into print...

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,022 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, November 14, 2023 1:38 AM

Won't have a problem with a Metro-North conductorm but might have one when showing his Amtrak ticket to a change-booth attendent at the Grand Central subway station or an M5 bus driver,

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,834 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Wednesday, November 15, 2023 5:20 PM

Have to wonder if concrete materials were less than standard?  Concrete should not have failed this soon even with exposure to salt.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,955 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, November 15, 2023 5:56 PM

blue streak 1
Have to wonder if concrete materials were less than standard?  Concrete should not have failed this soon even with exposure to salt.

When one investigates construction failures, either while the structure is still under construction or after the job has been completed - more than 90% if the time it is found the somewhere along the line a sub-contractor felt he could substitute a 'cheaper' material of a lesser quality than specified in the specifications for the job.  A story as old as construction for profit.

Romans built their structures to last, not to come in under budget.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,377 posts
Posted by Overmod on Thursday, November 16, 2023 7:09 AM

BaltACD
Romans built their structures to last, not to come in under budget.

"Romans" by and large built as cheaply as any other culture -- see 'insulae' for example.  What we have are the parts that didn't get knocked down or re-used -- the roads being an example.

The Persians did far better at 'structures built to last'; some of their major bridges were stone with lead alloy as mortar.  Unlike the old Roman roads or hydraulic-cement ruins... but like Nero's Golden House... those structures had 'adaptive reuse'.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy