Trains.com

Amtrak 11 on the move after 36 hours stranded

1778 views
8 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Amtrak 11 on the move after 36 hours stranded
Posted by zardoz on Tuesday, February 26, 2019 11:23 AM

Good thing the locomotives had sufficient fuel to keep the power on.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/26/us/oregon-train-passengers-stranded-trnd/index.html

 

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Tuesday, February 26, 2019 5:50 PM

Typically, would Amtrak feed all passegers during such a stranding?  And are latrine facilities of sufficient capacity to contain all they might be expected to,.... for such an extended time?

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, February 26, 2019 5:58 PM

Convicted One
Typically, would Amtrak feed all passegers during such a stranding?  And are latrine facilities of sufficient capacity to contain all they might be expected to,.... for such an extended time?

Whatever the real answer is - in that situation you have to make do with what you have.  They are fortunate that there was sufficient fuel to keep the HEP running and supplying heat.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Tuesday, February 26, 2019 6:32 PM

BaltACD
in that situation you have to make do with what you have.

Very true, I was just curious how "primitive" things may have become. 

1. 36 hours is a long time with no snow shovel, especially if the "tanks" are overflowing.

2. Just curious if there would be any gratis attempt to make sure everybody eats, or if capitalism ruled the food locker.

 

 3. I read in the link that some riders were complaining about no access to showers. I would think Amtrak  would be wanting to conserve water for the duration and encourage even the premium customers to avoid non-essential water use.
  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 1,836 posts
Posted by 243129 on Monday, March 11, 2019 4:34 PM

My question would be; Why was the train not towed or backed up the 27 or so miles to Eugene where there is 'civilization' sooner?

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Monday, March 11, 2019 5:02 PM

243129

My question would be; Why was the train not towed or backed up the 27 or so miles to Eugene where there is 'civilization' sooner?

 

It is not easy to back over trees that have fallen on the track.

Johnny

  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 1,836 posts
Posted by 243129 on Monday, March 11, 2019 6:44 PM

Deggesty

 

 
243129

My question would be; Why was the train not towed or backed up the 27 or so miles to Eugene where there is 'civilization' sooner?

 

 

 

It is not easy to back over trees that have fallen on the track.

 

 

Oh really? I never would have known had you not posted that.

Please post a link to that info, I was not aware that trees had fallen behind them.

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: The 17th hole at TPC
  • 2,283 posts
Posted by n012944 on Monday, March 11, 2019 7:10 PM

243129

 

 
Deggesty

 

 
243129

My question would be; Why was the train not towed or backed up the 27 or so miles to Eugene where there is 'civilization' sooner?

 

 

 

It is not easy to back over trees that have fallen on the track.

 

 

 

 

Oh really? I never would have known had you not posted that.

Please post a link to that info, I was not aware that trees had fallen behind them.

 

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=why+didn%27t+amtrak+back+up+in+oregon

 

"The train is "inoperable due to weather conditions and downed trees. UP crews are in the process of clearing the track and are expected to reach the train by 6 a.m. The train will move back to Eugene then Portland."

 

https://komonews.com/news/local/amtrak-train-stuck-in-oregon-for-more-than-a-day-is-moving-02-26-2019

An "expensive model collector"

  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 1,836 posts
Posted by 243129 on Monday, March 11, 2019 7:43 PM

n012944

 

 
243129

 

 
Deggesty

 

 
243129

My question would be; Why was the train not towed or backed up the 27 or so miles to Eugene where there is 'civilization' sooner?

 

 

 

It is not easy to back over trees that have fallen on the track.

 

 

 

 

Oh really? I never would have known had you not posted that.

Please post a link to that info, I was not aware that trees had fallen behind them.

 

 

 

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=why+didn%27t+amtrak+back+up+in+oregon

 

"The train is "inoperable due to weather conditions and downed trees. UP crews are in the process of clearing the track and are expected to reach the train by 6 a.m. The train will move back to Eugene then Portland."

 

https://komonews.com/news/local/amtrak-train-stuck-in-oregon-for-more-than-a-day-is-moving-02-26-2019

 

Ah you have answered my questionYes. So glad you highlighted "back".

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy