Trains.com

Wick Moorman should push freight railroads for more access

2390 views
17 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • 1,568 posts
Wick Moorman should push freight railroads for more access
Posted by CandOforprogress2 on Thursday, December 15, 2016 11:53 AM

Amtrak has the authority to force access to freight railroads right of way why dont they use it?

Posted by CandOforprogress2 on Friday, November 18, 2016 6:48 PM

That authority has been used only once in the case of Boston and Maine Guilford in Mass. Amtraks creation in law had the authority to force access when they need it. Why then do we read that Amtrak has to beg UP and CSX for access?

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • 422 posts
Posted by Dragoman on Friday, December 16, 2016 3:42 PM
The law also requires "fair" compensation to the RRs for the use. What is "fair"? UP said it would of course allow making the Sunset daily -- for three-quarters of a billion dollars! Is that "fair"? Is it worth fighting about?
  • Member since
    September 2010
  • From: East Coast
  • 1,175 posts
Posted by D.Carleton on Saturday, December 17, 2016 6:16 PM

Railroads are a business, we do what we do to make money. Show up with a big bag of cash and they will listen.

Editor Emeritus, This Week at Amtrak

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Saturday, December 17, 2016 8:26 PM

Railroads were chartered to provide transportation for passngers and freight, i.e., a common carrier.  Amtrak was a deal to let railroads off the hook of a legal obligation to run a decent passenger service.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,934 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Saturday, December 17, 2016 8:35 PM

When Wick was at NS he didn't cut Amtrak any breaks.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • 422 posts
Posted by Dragoman on Saturday, December 17, 2016 9:20 PM

schlimm

Railroads were chartered to provide transportation for passngers and freight, i.e., a common carrier.  Amtrak was a deal to let railroads off the hook of a legal obligation to run a decent passenger service.

 

Yes, and part of the "deal" in exchange for letting the RRs "off the hook" as far as passenger losses were concerned, was that they had to allow NRPC (dba Amtrak) to run the trains, at its own expense, on the RRs infrastructure.

 

Somehow, that latter part of the "deal" has gotten preverted.

 

Yes, yes, I know it is their property, etc., etc.  But where would they be if there was still an ICC continuing to require that they operate those trains they were allowed to discontinue on 01 May 1971?

 

For all of the talk about the RRs  being "private enterprise", it just looks like they have figured out that they can extort taxpayer $$ from Amtrak (or the states), if a new train frequency/route is wanted bad enough.

 

Just my 2 cents worth.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,014 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Sunday, December 18, 2016 7:06 AM

When Wick was at NS, like today, generally NS tries to keep Amtrak on time, probably more consistantly than the other five.

  • Member since
    September 2010
  • From: East Coast
  • 1,175 posts
Posted by D.Carleton on Sunday, December 18, 2016 9:40 PM

Dragoman
The law also requires "fair" compensation to the RRs for the use. What is "fair"? UP said it would of course allow making the Sunset daily -- for three-quarters of a billion dollars! Is that "fair"? Is it worth fighting about?

Amtrak wanted to run a daily Sunset. Uncle Pete said "yes" for X amount of money. This is where Amtrak was supposed to come back and say "no," we think it should be Y amount of money. Then Uncle Pete says "no" and either demands X amount all over again or some other sum. (Mind you, both sides come to the table with charts, graph, studies and 27 colored glossy pictures.) Reaching an impass they retire to the Surface Transportation Board for mediation, a mandated number and Amtrak then decides if they can swing it. That's the process; negotiation.

Instead, Amtrak slinked back to Washington and promised not to ask about a daily Sunset for some set amount of years (I forget how many). In the end since it's not the NEC, it was not worth fighting about.

Editor Emeritus, This Week at Amtrak

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,968 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Monday, December 19, 2016 7:26 AM

daveklepper

When Wick was at NS, like today, generally NS tries to keep Amtrak on time, probably more consistantly than the other five.

 

He did.  In fact, Amtrak train performance was included in the overall train performance metric that was part of the company bonus calculation.  Also, NS calculates Amtrak train performance exactly the same way Amtrak measures NS.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,968 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Monday, December 19, 2016 7:28 AM

BaltACD

When Wick was at NS he didn't cut Amtrak any breaks.

 

One of the conditions for new Amtrak trains on NS is that they must contribute appropriately to shareholder value.  That is, they must pay above their cost to accomodate.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,934 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Monday, December 19, 2016 9:09 AM

oltmannd
daveklepper

When Wick was at NS, like today, generally NS tries to keep Amtrak on time, probably more consistantly than the other five.

He did.  In fact, Amtrak train performance was included in the overall train performance metric that was part of the company bonus calculation.  Also, NS calculates Amtrak train performance exactly the same way Amtrak measures NS.

All carriers calculate Amtrak performance the way Amtrak does, otherwise they would be talking apples and fireflys when it comes time to negotiate with Amtrak.  NS has very little in the way of Amtrack to operate.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    September 2010
  • 2,515 posts
Posted by Electroliner 1935 on Monday, December 19, 2016 6:59 PM

BaltACD
NS has very little in the way of Amtrack to operate.

I think you don't have that correct. 

Most Amtrak trains out of Chicago use NS. Cardinal/Hoosier to Thorton Jct, IL. Michigan trains to Porter IN.   Lake Shore Limited to Cleveland, Capitol Limited to Pittsburg. Also  Pennsylvanian between Pittsburg and Harrisburg PA. And they host the Crescent plus the N. Carolina trains, the NE Regionals to Lynchburg and Norfolk. And I think the Adriondak is now NS (ex D&H) north of Schenectady.

I won't say they have more than the other three class I's. CSX has the Cardinal. the Florida trains, All of the trains south of Washington DC until Alexandria where NS's split off. The Empire service West of Albany as well as the Lake Shore Limited

BNSF has the Empire Builder West of Minneapolis, The CZ between Chicago & Denver and the SW Chief all the way, Also the Illinois trains to Quincy. I'm not clear how the trains between Portland and Seattle are operated but I think that it is BNSF. The Cascades to Vancouver. The San Diego trains south of LA. P/O the San Joaquins

Up has the Sunset, the CZ west of Denver, the Coast Starlight, plus the Capitol Corridor trains and a part of the San Joaquins. The Texas Eagle S of Joliet. 

I am not listing the CP and CN but they have a few. And the KCS has none.

Thats the ones I can think of, I invite others to correct. How do you calculate the "OPERATE". Number of trains, train milage?

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: The 17th hole at TPC
  • 2,260 posts
Posted by n012944 on Monday, December 19, 2016 7:05 PM

Electroliner 1935

 Cardinal/Hoosier to Thorton Jct, IL.

80th st to Thorton Jct is the UP/CSX ex C&EI, not the NS.  

An "expensive model collector"

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Monday, December 19, 2016 8:08 PM

My maps show Thornton Jct. I have found that I must reread what I have typed so that it will make sense.

Johnny

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,825 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Monday, December 19, 2016 10:04 PM

IMO Wick needs to gently push for future access  not today.  There is no extra equipment so an immediate push is an exercise  activity in futility.  Now when the Sprinters and new Nippon NS cars become active and the shuffling of equipment begins then maybe ?

Since we have no idea what the new Congress will do requirements to operate Amtrak anything else is premature.   

  • Member since
    September 2010
  • 2,515 posts
Posted by Electroliner 1935 on Monday, December 19, 2016 10:57 PM

n012944
80th st to Thorton Jct is the UP/CSX ex C&EI, not the NS.

You are correct, after leaving Chicago Union Station on Amtrak rails, the Cardinal runs on the NS (former PRR) track South of the Amtrak sanitary canal bridge (21st st) to 40th St where it diverges to the UP (former C&EI). It takes UP track to Thornton Jct where it connects to the CN (former GTW) thence CN to Maynard where it goes to CSX (former Monon). So crews have to be familiar with five carriers rules.  

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,934 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, December 20, 2016 12:00 AM

Electroliner 1935
n012944

You are correct, after leaving Chicago Union Station on Amtrak rails, the Cardinal runs on the NS (former PRR) track South of the Amtrak sanitary canal bridge (21st st) to 40th St where it diverges to the UP (former C&EI). It takes UP track to Thornton Jct where it connects to the CN (former GTW) thence CN to Maynard where it goes to CSX (former Monon). So crews have to be familiar with five carriers rules. 

And have in their possession all the rule books, train handling rule books, safety rule books, time table, Superintendent bulletins and train messages for each carrier whose territory they are operating on.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    February 2016
  • From: Texas
  • 1,537 posts
Posted by PJS1 on Wednesday, December 21, 2016 8:05 PM

"UP has ............The Texas Eagle S of Joliet."  

This is mostly but not completely accurate.  Between Dallas and Fort Worth the Texas Eagle runs over the Trinity Railway Express, which is the former Rock Island line between the two cities. Between Fort Worth and Temple it runs on the BNSF. 

Rio Grande Valley, CFI,CFII

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy