Trains.com

Michigan Coast-to-Coast Rail Study

3619 views
17 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Michigan Coast-to-Coast Rail Study
Posted by schlimm on Wednesday, March 9, 2016 1:30 PM

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,449 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Thursday, March 10, 2016 11:43 PM

I knew that Michigan was studying Grand Rapids-Detroit passenger service, but I am concerned how the study is progressing.  When alternative routes are consicered, the route that includes the most population centers may skew the stats, if longer distances are not considered.  The larger population sampling may all want new service, however, I doubt the most critical cities, GR and Lansing, will want to endure the diversion to Jackson, just to pick up a handful of additional passengers.  The Lansing-Jackson and Howell-Ann Arbor segments are shortlines, and the higher cost of upgrading those segments is shown in the report.  It is suprising that the AA-Jackson segment (an existing Amtrak corridor) will cost more to upgrade than the Lansing-Howell CSX freight line.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Friday, March 11, 2016 7:53 AM

MidlandMike
The Lansing-Jackson and Howell-Ann Arbor segments are shortlines, and the higher cost of upgrading those segments is shown in the report.  It is suprising that the AA-Jackson segment (an existing Amtrak corridor) will cost more to upgrade than the Lansing-Howell CSX freight line.

That aspect made no sense to me either.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,449 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Saturday, March 12, 2016 9:33 PM

IIRC, Amtrak wants to re-install double track on the Wolverine Corridor, so a new service on the AA-Jackson segment might have to contribute.

  • Member since
    December 2009
  • 1,751 posts
Posted by dakotafred on Sunday, March 13, 2016 6:47 AM

I'm puzzled by the "coast to coast" moniker. Is this a pretentious way of saying "border to border" or "shore to shore"?

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,644 posts
Posted by Wizlish on Sunday, March 13, 2016 7:09 AM

schlimm
MidlandMike

That aspect made no sense to me either.

Some of the specific details are said to be in section 1.4.1 and Chapter 4 of the full report, a .pdf download. 

Note also the very important NS principles in the link at the bottom of page 1-6.  (My version of Acrobat made it impossible to copy the link, but just clicking on it automatically downloads a copy whether I want one or not.  Not sure I comprehend why people design software this way sometimes...)

 

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Sunday, March 13, 2016 10:42 AM

The ''''coasts" are obviously those of Great Lakes, not the two major oceans.

  • Member since
    September 2010
  • 2,515 posts
Posted by Electroliner 1935 on Sunday, March 13, 2016 4:29 PM

I note this line from the study:

"At present the passenger proposals laid out here are still un-negotiated, un-funded and at a pre-feasibility level." 

This is as it should be but one can hope that this bears fruit. As a potential passenger, this would be nice. As a shareholder of NS stock, the principles stated are valid in protecting the Railroads property. 

  • Member since
    December 2009
  • 1,751 posts
Posted by dakotafred on Sunday, March 13, 2016 7:09 PM

daveklepper

The ''''coasts" are obviously those of Great Lakes, not the two major oceans.

 

Yeah, and who that you know would say he lives on the "coast" of Lake Huron or the "coast" of Lake Michigan?

Grandiose flapdoodle by post-literate bureaucrats with a tin ear!

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Sunday, March 13, 2016 9:22 PM

Should have been "Shore to Shore."   But what about the plans, routes and service levels and speed?

 

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,449 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Tuesday, March 15, 2016 9:43 PM

Wizlish

...

Note also the very important NS principles in the link at the bottom of page 1-6.  ...

 

NS now only owns a short segment of the route in the Detroit area.  I'm sure Amtrak could live with 79 mph limit east of Dearborn.

  • Member since
    March 2010
  • 145 posts
Posted by bill613a on Wednesday, April 6, 2016 8:01 PM

This is an interesting proposal with much potential. Since the state of Michigan owns the two Wisconsin Talgos why not run tests over the proposed routes to see what condition the tracks are in and get a feel as to what Talgos can do on them.  Why not spend some funds on this and let the public get a look at what is possible?

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • 1,180 posts
Posted by ROBERT WILLISON on Saturday, April 9, 2016 12:09 PM

Lake Erie coast line in Ohio is known as the north coast.

  • Member since
    December 2009
  • 1,751 posts
Posted by dakotafred on Saturday, April 9, 2016 5:00 PM

ROBERT WILLISON

Lake Erie coast line in Ohio is known as the north coast.

 

 
To whom, and since when? I was born in Cleveland -- admittedly, a long time ago-- lived there 22 years, try to keep up with the Best Location, and I've never heard 'North Coast' in my life.
  • Member since
    November 2013
  • 1,097 posts
Posted by Buslist on Saturday, April 9, 2016 5:18 PM

bill613a

Since the state of Michigan owns the two Wisconsin Talgos 

 

. Since when?

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • 1,180 posts
Posted by ROBERT WILLISON on Saturday, April 9, 2016 5:40 PM

Dakotafred, goggle it and you will be enlighten. Their is a specific north coast area in Cleveland itself and for the the entire region. Their are many references to the coast  and business named the same.

I too grew up in Cleveland left and came back. Low and behold their a north coast.

So times they are a changing, can't assume everything stays the same.

  • Member since
    December 2009
  • 1,751 posts
Posted by dakotafred on Saturday, April 9, 2016 7:57 PM

Okay, Robert, you got me. I will concede the modern, Chamber-type usage.

But, dagnammit, I'll go down with the ship on Webster's absolute, unequivocal limitation of 'coast' to "land alongside the sea; seashore." No provision for lakeside or stock ponds!  

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • 1,180 posts
Posted by ROBERT WILLISON on Saturday, April 9, 2016 10:35 PM

Dakota, I can agree with you their.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy